Opposition as a Metonymic Principle

Vosshagen, Christian

doi:10.1075/hcp.4.17vos

In:Metonymy in Language and Thought
Edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden
[Human Cognitive Processing 4] 1999
► pp. 289–308

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Opposition as a Metonymic Principle

Christian Vosshagen

Published online: 15 September 1999

https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.17vos

Cited by (16)

Cited by 16 other publications

Order by:

Brdar-Szabó, Rita & Mario Brdar

2023. Figuratively used product names: From ergonyms to eponyms and paragons. Lingua 290 ► pp. 103552 ff.

Barnden, John A.

2022. Metonymy, reflexive hyperbole and broadly reflexive relationships. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 33 ff.

Apresjan, Valentina, Anastasiya Lopukhina & Maria Zarifyan

2021. Representation of Different Types of Adjectival Polysemy in the Mental Lexicon. Frontiers in Psychology 12

Lewandowski, Wojciech

2021. Constructions are not predictable but are motivated: evidence from the Spanish completive reflexive. Linguistics 59:1 ► pp. 35 ff.

Herrero Ruiz, Javier

2019. Metaphor and metonymy in jokes. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:2 ► pp. 650 ff.

Herrero-Ruiz, Javier

2020. On Some Pragmatic Effects of Event Metonymies. Metaphor and Symbol 35:4 ► pp. 266 ff.

Barnden, John

2018. Some contrast effects in metonymy. In Conceptual metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 97 ff.

Kraska-Szlenk, Iwona

2018. Address inversion in Swahili: Usage patterns, cognitive motivation and cultural factors . Cognitive Linguistics 29:3 ► pp. 545 ff.

Athanasiadou, Angeliki

2017. Introduction. Figurative thought, figurative language, figurative grammar?. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 2 ff.

Athanasiadou, Angeliki

2017. Irony has a metonymic basis. In Irony in language use and communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1], ► pp. 201 ff.

Athanasiadou, Angeliki

2020. Intensification via figurative language. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9], ► pp. 91 ff.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg

2017. Chapter 1. Exploitingwh-questions for expressive purposes. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 18 ff.

Pálinkás, István

2014. Blending and folk theory in an explanation of irony. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 64 ff.

Kosecki, Krzysztof

2007. On Multiple Metonymies within Indirect Speech Acts . Research in Language 5 ► pp. 213 ff.

Fisher, Harwood

2003. Metonymy as concept: A metaphor for rhetoric, not for thought. Semiotica 2003:147

[no author supplied]

2022. Introduction to Cognitive Pragmatics [Cognitive Linguistics in Practice, 4],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.