On the Role of the Direct Object: Grammatical Constraints on Metonymy

Waltereit, Richard

doi:10.1075/hcp.4.14wal

In:Metonymy in Language and Thought
Edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden
[Human Cognitive Processing 4] 1999
► pp. 233–254

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Grammatical Constraints on Metonymy

On the Role of the Direct Object

Richard Waltereit

Published online: 15 September 1999

https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.14wal

Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Order by:

Ivanová, Martina

2023. Substitúcie situačných aktantov v slovenčine. Slovo a slovesnost 84:1 ► pp. 26 ff.

Szymańska, Monika

2021. Grammatical metonymy and construal operations. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 465 ff.

Amaral, Luana & Márcia Cançado

2020. Metonymy triggers syntactic argument alternation:vehicleforconductormetonymy as a constraint on lexical-constructional integration. Cognitive Linguistics 31:1 ► pp. 113 ff.

Levin, Beth

2020. Resultatives and Constraints on Concealed Causatives. In Perspectives on Causation [Jerusalem Studies in Philosophy and History of Science, ], ► pp. 185 ff.

Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó

2017. On constructional blocking of metonymies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 183 ff.

Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó

2017. Chapter 5. How metonymy and grammar interact. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 126 ff.

Fisher, Harwood

2003. Metonymy as concept: A metaphor for rhetoric, not for thought. Semiotica 2003:147

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.