In:Metaphor in Use: Context, culture, and communication
Edited by Fiona MacArthur, José Luis Oncins-Martínez, Manuel Sánchez-García and Ana M. Piquer-Píriz
[Human Cognitive Processing 38] 2012
► pp. 177–194
Chapter 8. Appreciation and interpretation of visual metaphors in advertising across three European countries
Published online: 17 October 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.38.14mul
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.38.14mul
The alternative typologies of visual metaphors proposed by Forceville (1996, 2005) and Phillips and McQuarrie (2004) show some striking similarities with regard to disposition of the visual elements, that is, the source and target domains. The first part of this chapter summarizes the results of two experiments that tested the validity of these classifications with Spanish, French, and Dutch participants and proposes an overall image of the appreciation of the three visual metaphor types. The second part focuses on the interpretations of the metaphors by the Spanish, French, and Dutch participants in the second experiment, to verify whether culture influences the interpretation of the common ground in visual metaphor. We detected subtle cultural differences in focus and interpretive diversity.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Chatti, Sami
Chatti, Sami
Chatti, Sami
Virág, Ágnes
2020. Multimodal conceptual patterns of Hungary in political cartoons. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:1 ► pp. 222 ff.
Virág, Ágnes
2022. Multimodal conceptual patterns of Hungary in political cartoons. In Visual Metaphors [Benjamins Current Topics, 124], ► pp. 231 ff.
Bolognesi, Marianna, Benjamin Timmermans & Lora Aroyo
2019. VisMet and the crowd. In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8], ► pp. 99 ff.
Poppi, Fabio I. M.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
