In:Metaphor in Use: Context, culture, and communication
Edited by Fiona MacArthur, José Luis Oncins-Martínez, Manuel Sánchez-García and Ana M. Piquer-Píriz
[Human Cognitive Processing 38] 2012
► pp. 51–68
Chapter 2. Metaphor in discourse
Beyond the boundaries of MIP
Published online: 17 October 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.38.06dor
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.38.06dor
The lack of a reliable methodology for identifying metaphor in discourse prompted a group of metaphor researchers to create the so-called MIP (Metaphor Identification Procedure; Pragglejaz Group 2007), which aims at identifying metaphorically used words. In our research project at VU University Amsterdam, four analysts have applied the MIP to language data from four different registers in the BNC-Baby. Since the MIP only caters for indirect metaphor use, one important goal of this project was to determine how to annotate directly used words that express cross-domain mappings. This chapter presents examples from our analyses to illustrate some salient methodological issues concerning the application of the MIP to different manifestations of metaphor in natural discourse, suggesting possible additions to the MIP.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Gaskins, Dorota & Gabriella Rundblad
Hsu, Hsiao-Ling, Huei-ling Lai & Jyi-Shane Liu
2022. democracy in Taiwanese presidential inaugural addresses. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 48:2 ► pp. 212 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
