In:Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and Expansion
Edited by Mario Brdar, Stefan Th. Gries and Milena Žic Fuchs
[Human Cognitive Processing 32] 2011
► pp. 179–218
On the subject of impersonals
Published online: 10 November 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.32.12lan
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.32.12lan
In accordance with basic principles of Cognitive Grammar, impersonal it (e.g. It’s obvious that he’s angry) is claimed to be meaningful. Three avenues of approach are followed in the characterization of it and the constructions it appears in: a comparison with related constructions; a comparison to other pronouns; and examination of a basic cognitive model called the “control cycle”. This broad perspective leads to a unified account in which the meaning of impersonal it is a special case of the general semantic value of this pronoun.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Park, Chongwon, Jaehoon Yeon & Jong-Bok Kim
2025. Setting subject and the inferential cleft construction in Korean. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 23:2 ► pp. 634 ff.
Booth, Hannah & Kim A. Groothuis
Fastrich, Bridgit
Heath, Jeffrey & Vadim Dyachkov
Mathurin, Élise
2023. Is ambient it truly non-referential?. In Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series, 228], ► pp. 53 ff.
Data-Bukowska, Ewa
PARK, CHONGWON & DANIEL TURNER
Park, Chongwon
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
