In:Bi-Directionality in the Cognitive Sciences: Avenues, challenges, and limitations
Edited by Marcus Callies, Wolfram R. Keller and Astrid Lohöfer
[Human Cognitive Processing 30] 2011
► pp. 43–56
Culture-specific concepts of emotionality and rationality
Published online: 13 July 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.30.04nie
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.30.04nie
The cultural models of emotionality and rationality showing up in figurative language use vary extensively on a worldwide scale. Such variation is largely due to different cultural backgrounds, for instance, concerning underlying ethnomedical or philosophical beliefs. The present chapter reports on a research project involving various, partly unrelated languages and the different cultural models that underlie these cultures’ conceptualizations of emotions and of the mind. Three general categories of conceptualization (namely abdominocentrism, cardiocentrism, and cerebrocentrism) are distinguished and discussed. As an example from the category of cerebrocentrism, metaphorical and metonymic expressions referring to emotionality and rationality concepts in present-day English are analyzed in depth.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Menete, Sérgio N., Guiying Jiang & Xu Qinliang
2025. Conceptualisation of mental activities through the body part ləbb ‘heart’ in Amharic. Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Koliada, A.
Powell, Philip A, Kaisa Puustinen-Hopper, Martin de Jode, Panagiotis Mavros & Jennifer Roberts
Baş, Melike
2017. Figurative uses of the head-denoting wordsbaşandkafain Turkish idioms. Pragmatics & Cognition 24:2 ► pp. 138 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
