In:Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view
Edited by Réka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Human Cognitive Processing 28] 2011
► pp. 147–166
Metonymy at the crossroads
A case of euphemisms and dysphemisms
Published online: 24 June 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.08gra
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.08gra
The chapter uses two small-scale studies to examine the effects of metonymy in political discourse. We re-examine some theoretical constructs proposed as definitional of metonymy, particularly pragmatic function (Barcelona, 2003a) and inclusion of the source and target in the same functional domain (ibid.). By analyzing the dysphemism chickenhawk as an instantiation of the metaphoric mapping humans are animals and the metonymic mapping part of a scenario for the whole scenario in the euphemism body count, we delineate the possibilities and limitations of metonymic inferencing (Panther and Thornburg, 2003). The observed differences in the pragmatic effect of euphemistic and dysphemistic expressions ascribed to metonymy reveal its differing foregrounding and backgrounding force.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Szabó, Lilla Petronella
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
Janićijević, Marko & Admir Gorčević
Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer
Pizarro Pedraza, Andrea & Barbara De Cock
2022. Taboo effects at the syntactic level. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 113 ff.
Salamurović, Aleksandra
Barnden, John
2018. Some contrast effects in metonymy. In Conceptual metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 97 ff.
Bakhtiar, Mohsen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
