In:Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World
Edited by Graham Low, Zazie Todd, Alice Deignan and Lynne Cameron
[Human Cognitive Processing 26] 2010
► pp. 357–374
18. The evaluative properties of metaphors
Published online: 13 October 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.26.21dei
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.26.21dei
It has been asserted by a number of writers from a range of disciplines that metaphors have evaluative and persuasive properties. In the Conceptual Metaphor Theory literature, it is widely agreed that metaphor is evaluative, persuasive and therefore potentially ideological. Outside the cognitive literature, metaphor’s persuasive qualities have been studied by researchers in fields from Critical Discourse Analysis to consumer research. This chapter reviews the mechanisms through which evaluation seems to be carried out, discussing a number of studies. Four themes are identified: metaphors as stories, with entailments, metaphors which map evaluative connotations from source to target domain, the deliberate choice of a source domain which resonates with particular groups of language users, and the use of metaphorical scenarios. I investigate these mechanisms in a small number of metaphorical expressions, using corpus techniques, with a focus on detailed analysis of form as well as meaning. I find that the evaluations conveyed by the expressions that I investigate seem most consistent with Musolff’s scenarios model (2006). However the evaluative meaning expressed is often even more specific, contextually and pragmatically, than his theory would predict. I also argue that the characteristic form of evaluative metaphorical expressions raises challenges for our current categories of linguistic description.
Keywords: chunking, connotation, evaluation, metaphor
Cited by (35)
Cited by 35 other publications
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed & Mouna Goubaa
Peterssen, Silvia
2025. Polarisation in Venezuelan presidential tweets. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 13:2 ► pp. 240 ff.
Zhang, Cun, Guiling Liu & Shuang Zhang
Allami, Hamid, Monica Karlsson & Hamid Reza Shahroosvand
Alvanoudi, Angeliki
2024. Conventionalized impoliteness formulae in third-party assessments. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Foley, Jennifer & Laura Hidalgo-Downing
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura & Paula Pérez-Sobrino
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura, Paula Pérez-Sobrino, Laura Filardo-Llamas, Carmen Maíz-Arévalo, Begoña Núñez-Perucha, Alfonso Sánchez-Moya & Julia T. Williams Camus
2024. A protocol for the annotation of evaluative stance and metaphor across four discourse genres. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 486 ff.
Peterssen, Silvia & Augusto Soares da Silva
2024. Polarising metaphors in the Venezuelan Presidential Crisis. Journal of Language and Politics 23:4 ► pp. 588 ff.
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura & Niamh A. O’Dowd
Xu, Qingshu
Yuan, Guorong & Yi Sun
Alkhammash, Reem
Alkhammash, Reem
Demjén, Zsófia, Elena Semino & Veronika Koller
Devylder, Simon
Rossi, Maria Grazia, Fabrizio Macagno & Sarah Bigi
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
Golden, Anne & Guri Steien
Yu, Yating
Chatti, Sami
2020. Seasonal metaphors in Arab journalistic discourse. Metaphor and the Social World 10:1 ► pp. 22 ff.
López Maestre, María D.
Negro Alousque, Isabel
Albusafi, Rahma
2019. Musolff, Andreas (2016). Political metaphor analysis discourse and scenarios
. Journal of Language and Politics 18:6 ► pp. 946 ff.
Šarić, Ljiljana
2019. How to do things with metaphors. In Metaphor, Nation and Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 82], ► pp. 287 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
Musolff, Andreas
Musolff, Andreas
Musolff, Andreas
Musolff, Andreas
2023. Culture-specific variation in interpretations of nations as
bodies metaphors by English and German L1 speakers. In Cultural Linguistics and Critical Discourse Studies [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 103], ► pp. 15 ff.
Syarifuddin, Syarifuddin & Marwah Yusuf
McIntyre, Dan
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
