A corpus-based approach to cognitive semantic analysis: Behavioral profiles

Gries, Stefan Th.; Divjak, Dagmar

doi:10.1075/hcp.24.07gri

In:New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by Vyvyan Evans and Stéphanie Pourcel
[Human Cognitive Processing 24] 2009
► pp. 57–75

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Behavioral profiles

A corpus-based approach to cognitive semantic analysis

Stefan Th. Gries

Dagmar Divjak

Published online: 24 June 2009

https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.24.07gri

Cited by (57)

Cited by 57 other publications

Order by:

Georgakopoulos, Thanasis & Marialena Lavda

2025. A corpus-based behavioral profile analysis of polysemy and antonymy: the case of the ancient Greek size adjectives mikrós and mégas . Folia Linguistica 59:3 ► pp. 947 ff.

Karjus, Andres

2025. Machine-assisted quantitizing designs: augmenting humanities and social sciences with artificial intelligence. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12:1

Looi, Jarvis, Patricia Nora Riget, Alex Boulton & Roshidah Hassan

2025. From theory to data. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics

Mikkelsen, Olaf & Cameron Morin

2025. Register as a source of non-equivalent contracted constructions: going to and gonna in British English. English Language and Linguistics 29:3 ► pp. 609 ff.

Ursini, Francesco-Alessio & Yue Sara Zhang

2025. Syntactic Cartography meets semantic maps: charting the polysemy of Italian simple prepositions. The Linguistic Review

Zhang, Zhuo & Meichun Liu

2025. Exploring Semantic Variations of Happiness-Denoting Near-Synonyms with Behavioral Profiles. In Chinese Lexical Semantics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 15552], ► pp. 3 ff.

Baayen, R. Harald

2024. The wompom. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 20:3 ► pp. 615 ff.

Bębeniec, Daria

2024. In search of methodological standards for corpus-based cognitive semantics: The case of Behavioral Profiles. Studia Neophilologica 96:2 ► pp. 483 ff.

Dai, Ying & Yicheng Wu

2024. The colexification of vision and cognition in Mandarin: controlled activity surpasses uncontrolled experience. Cognitive Linguistics 35:3 ► pp. 345 ff.

Dou, Jinmeng, Meichun Liu & Zhuo Zhang

2024. A Multiple Correspondence Analysis on the Adverbial Uses of the Chinese Color Term Bai ‘White’. In Chinese Lexical Semantics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14514], ► pp. 254 ff.

Glynn, Dylan & Olaf Mikkelsen

2024. Concrete constructions or messy mangroves? How modelling contextual effects on constructional alternations reflect theoretical assumptions of language structure. Linguistics Vanguard 10:s1 ► pp. 9 ff.

Liu, Meichun & Jinmeng Dou

2024. Metaphorical polysemy of the Chinese color termhēi黑 “black”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Llopis Cardona, Ana & Marlies Jansegers

2024. Del rollo como sustantivo comodín contracultural al rollo aproximador en el español coloquial actual. Spanish in Context 21:1 ► pp. 159 ff.

Rosemeyer, Malte

2024. Data-driven identification of situated meanings in corpus data using Latent Class Analysis. Open Linguistics 10:1

Wang, Haitao, Toshiyuki Kanamaru & Ke Li

2024. The polysemy of the Japanese temperature adjective atsui . Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 476 ff.

Wyroślak, Piotr & Dylan Glynn

2024. Disentangling constructional networks: integrating taxonomic effects into the description of grammatical alternations. Linguistics Vanguard 10:s1 ► pp. 29 ff.

杨, 慧君

2024. Cognitive Semantic Analysis of the Word “Run” Based on Behavioral Characteristics. Modern Linguistics 12:08 ► pp. 448 ff.

de Baets, Pauline & Gert de Sutter

2023. How do translators select among competing (near-)synonyms in translation?. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 35:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

DESAGULIER, GUILLAUME & PHILIPPE MONNERET

2023. Cognitive Linguistics and a Usage‐Based Approach to the Study of Semantics and Pragmatics. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 31 ff.

Fang, Xiaochen & Jinwei Zhu

2023. Research streams and frontier issues of visual perception in the 21st century. The Design Journal 26:5 ► pp. 753 ff.

Guajardo, Gustavo

2023. Transitivity on a continuum: the transitivity index as a predictor of Spanish causatives. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 19:2 ► pp. 145 ff.

Schmid, Hans-Jörg

2023. Multi-Dimensional Regularity Analysis: How the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model can be applied to corpus data. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 11:1 ► pp. 23 ff.

Willaert, Tom & Alhamzah F. Abbas

2023. A computational analysis of Telegram’s narrative affordances. PLOS ONE 18:11 ► pp. e0293508 ff.

Wu, Shuqiong & Yue Ou

2023. A quantitative study of the polysemy of Mandarin Chinese perception verb kàn ‘look/see’ . Australian Journal of Linguistics 43:3 ► pp. 191 ff.

王, 婷

2023. The Polysemy of the Chinese Verb “Kai”: A Corpus-Based Behavioral Profile Analysis. Modern Linguistics 11:06 ► pp. 2771 ff.

Johannsen, Berit

2022. She has a stadium named after her . Constructions and Frames 14:1 ► pp. 41 ff.

Liesenfeld, Andreas, Meichun Liu & Chu-Ren Huang

2022. Profiling the Chinese causative construction withrang(讓),shi(使) andling(令) using frame semantic features. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18:2 ► pp. 263 ff.

Romain, Laurence

2022. Putting the argument back into argument structure constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 35 ff.

Thwaites, Peter

2022. Exploring the impact of lexical context on word association responses. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 27:3 ► pp. 321 ff.

Wyroślak, Piotr

2022. No big deal: Situation-backgrounding uses of the Polish dative reflexive pronoun sobie/se . Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 10:1 ► pp. 77 ff.

Wyroślak, Piotr

2023. Accusative-instrumental alternation in Polish. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 68:1 ► pp. 41 ff.

Zehentner, Eva

2022. Revisiting Gradience in Diachronic Construction Grammar: PPs and the Complement-Adjunct Distinction in the History of English. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 70:3 ► pp. 301 ff.

Zehentner, Eva

2022. Ambiguity avoidance as a factor in the rise of the English dative alternation. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

Butler, Christopher S. & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen

2021. Social and Physical Distance/Distancing: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Recent Changes in Usage. Corpus Pragmatics 5:4 ► pp. 427 ff.

Pettersson-Traba, Daniela

2021. A diachronic perspective on near-synonymy: The concept of sweet-smelling in American English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17:2 ► pp. 319 ff.

Van Wettere, Niek

2021. Copularity of French and Dutch (semi-)copular constructions: a behavioral profile analysis. Linguistics 59:6 ► pp. 1359 ff.

Wu, Shuqiong

2021. A corpus-based study of the Chinese synonymous approximativesshangxia, qianhouandzuoyou. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17:2 ► pp. 411 ff.

Wu, Shuqiong

2022. A corpus-based study of the time orientation of qian “front” and hou “back” in Chinese. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18:3 ► pp. 447 ff.

Bochkarev, Vladimir, Anna Shevlyakova & Valery Solovyev

2020. A Method of Semantic Change Detection Using Diachronic Corpora Data. In Analysis of Images, Social Networks and Texts [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1086], ► pp. 94 ff.

Davidse, Kristin & Hendrik De Smet

2020. Diachronic Corpora. In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, ► pp. 211 ff.

Soto Nieto, Almudena

2020. La red polisémica denegro. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 33:2 ► pp. 562 ff.

Abdulrahim, Dana

2019. go constructions in Modern Standard Arabic. Constructions and Frames 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Kormacheva, Daria

2019. Choosing Between Lexeme vs. Token in Russian Collocations. Scando-Slavica 65:1 ► pp. 77 ff.

Osborne, John

2019. Sandra Deshors, Multidimensional Perspectives on Interlanguage. Exploring may and can across Learner Corpora . International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:1 ► pp. 104 ff.

Proos, Mariann

2019. Polysemy of the Estonian perception verb nägema ‘to see’. In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19], ► pp. 231 ff.

Faber, Pamela & Pilar León-Araúz

2016. Specialized Knowledge Representation and the Parameterization of Context. Frontiers in Psychology 7

Sullivan, Karen

2016. Whysuave movimientoisn’t ‘smooth movement’. Languages in Contrast 16:1 ► pp. 118 ff.

Seržant, Ilja A.

2015. An approach to syntactic reconstruction. In Perspectives on Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 169], ► pp. 117 ff.

Deshors, Sandra C. & Stefan Th. Gries

2014. A case for the multifactorial assessment of learner language. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43], ► pp. 179 ff.

Glynn, Dylan

2014. Techniques and tools. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43], ► pp. 307 ff.

Glynn, Dylan

2022. Emergent categories. In Analogy and Contrast in Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 73], ► pp. 245 ff.

Демиденко, Г. Г.

2014. Вербализация позитивных эмоций в украинской паралингвистической фразеологии: этнокультурный аспект,

Anishchanka, Alena V. & Weiwei Zhang

2012. Review of Philip (2011): Colouring Meaning: Collocation and Connotation in Figurative Language. Metaphor and the Social World 2:1 ► pp. 121 ff.

Endresen, Anna, Laura A. Janda, Julia Kuznetsova, Olga Lyashevskaya, Anastasia Makarova, Tore Nesset & Svetlana Sokolova

2012. Russian “Purely Aspectual” Prefixes: Not So “Empty” after All?. Scando-Slavica 58:2 ► pp. 231 ff.

Janda, Laura A. & Olga Lyashevskaya

2011. Grammatical profiles and the interaction of the lexicon with aspect, tense, and mood in Russian. cogl 22:4 ► pp. 719 ff.

Nordlund, Marie

2010. Meaning Extensions of Grasp: A Corpus-Based Study. Lexis :4

[no author supplied]

2015. Impersonals and other Agent Defocusing Constructions in French [Human Cognitive Processing, 50],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.