Tilburg Memory-Based Learner versus Analogical Modeling: 6. A comparison of two analogical models

Eddington, David

doi:10.1075/hcp.10.12edd

In:Analogical Modeling: An exemplar-based approach to language
Edited by Royal Skousen, Deryle Lonsdale and Dilworth B. Parkinson
[Human Cognitive Processing 10] 2002
► pp. 141–155

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

6. A comparison of two analogical models

Tilburg Memory-Based Learner versus Analogical Modeling

David Eddington

Published online: 29 November 2002

https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.10.12edd

Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Order by:

Arndt-Lappe, Sabine

2023. Different lexicons make different rivals. Word Structure 16:1 ► pp. 24 ff.

SIMS-WILLIAMS, HELEN

2022. Token frequency as a determinant of morphological change. Journal of Linguistics 58:3 ► pp. 571 ff.

CHANDLER, STEVE

2017. The analogical modeling of linguistic categories. Language and Cognition 9:1 ► pp. 52 ff.

Chandler, Steve

2020. Sentence-level constructions: A demonstration in support of Ambridge (2020). First Language 40:5-6 ► pp. 569 ff.

van den Bosch, Antal & Walter Daelemans

2013. Implicit Schemata and Categories in Memory-based Language Processing. Language and Speech 56:3 ► pp. 309 ff.

Johnsen, Lars G. & Christer Johansson

2005. Efficient Modeling of Analogy. In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3406], ► pp. 694 ff.

[no author supplied]

2008. Book Review. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 15:2 ► pp. 212 ff.

[no author supplied]

2010. References. In The Handbook of Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing, ► pp. 655 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.