Cover not available

In:Italian Sign Language from a Cognitive and Socio-semiotic Perspective: Implications for a general language theory
Virginia Volterra, Maria Roccaforte, Alessio Di Renzo and Sabina Fontana
[Gesture Studies 9] 2022
► pp. 191216

Get fulltext from our e-platform
Acredolo, L., & Goodwyn, S. (1996). Baby Signs. Chicago: Contemporary Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ahlgren, I. & Bergman, B. (Eds.). (1980). Papers from the First International Symposium on Sign Language Research. June 10–16, 1979, Skepparholmen, Sweden. Leksand: Swedish National Association of the Deaf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Albanie, S., Varol, G., Momeni, L., Afouras, T., Chung, J. S., Fox, N., & Zisserman, A. (2020). BSL-1K: Scaling up co-articulated sign language recognition using mouthing cues. In A. Vedaldi, H. Bischof, T. Brox, & J. M. Frahm (Eds.), Computer Vision – ECCV 2020. ECCV 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12356. Berlin: Springer, Cham. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Albano Leoni, F. (2009). Dei suoni e dei sensi: il volto fonico delle parole. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Voce e sensi. Lingua e Patologia, 82 (dicembre), 69–82. In F. M. Dovetto (Ed.), Lingua e Patologia: le frontiere interdisciplinari del linguaggio (pp. 69–82). Roma: Aracne. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Some Remarks on Orality and the Antinomy between Writing and Speaking. In Western Linguistic Thought, in L. Lulli & A. Ercolani (Eds.), Codification, transcodification and trasmission of ‘cultural messages’, Berlin, de Gruyter, pp. 53-72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Albano Leoni, F. & Maturi, P.. (1992). Per una verifica pragmatica dei modelli fonologici. In G. Gobber (Ed.), La linguistica pragmatica (pp. 39–49.). Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Manuale di fonetica. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alfonzetti, G. (2012). Il discorso bilingue. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017a). Italian-dialect code-switching in Sicilian youngsters. Sociolinguistic Studies, 11 (2–3–4), 435–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017b). Parlare italiano e dialetto in Sicilia. Palermo: Centro di studi filologici e linguistici siciliani.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amatucci, L. (1995). La scuola italiana e l’istruzione dei sordi. In V. Volterra & G. Porcari Li Destri (Eds.), Passato e presente: uno sguardo sull’educazione dei Sordi in Italia (pp. 211–256). Napoli: Gnocchi Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amorini, G., & Lerose, L. (2012). Studi linguistici in Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS) Analisi fonologica e le funzioni deittiche ed avverbiali, e aspetti metaforici in parametri formazionali. Phd Dissertation. Alpen-Adria University.
Angelini, N., Borgioli, R., Folchi, A., & Mastromatteo, M. (1991). I primi 400 segni: Piccolo dizionario della Lingua Italiana dei Segni per comunicare con i sordi. Venezia: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antinoro Pizzuto, E. (2009). Meccanismi di coesione testuale e Strutture di Grande Iconicità nella Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS) e altre lingue dei segni 1. In C. Bertone & A. Cardinaletti (Eds.), Alcuni capitoli della grammatica della LIS (pp. 130–151). Venezia: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antinoro Pizzuto, E., & Pietrandrea, P. (2001). The notation of signed texts. Sign Language & LinguisticsSign Language and Linguistics, 4 (1–2), 29–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antinoro Pizzuto, E., Chiari, I., & Rossini, P. (2008). The representation issue and its multifaceted aspects in contructing sign language corpora. In O. Crassborn, T. Efthimiou, Hanke, Thoutenhoofd, & I. Zwitserlood (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Language, LREC (pp. 150–158).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antinoro Pizzuto, E., Rossini, P., Sallandre, M.-A., & Wilkinson, E. (2008a). Deixis, Anaphora and Highly Iconic Structures: Cross-linguistic Evidence on American (ASL), French (LSF) and Italian (LIS) Signed Languages Deixis, Anaphora and Highly Iconic Structures: Cross-linguistic Evidence on American (ASL), French (LSF) and Italian. In R. Müller de Quadro (Ed.). Sign Languages: Spinning and Unraveling the Past, Present and Future. TISLR9. (pp. 475–495). Petropolis: Arara Azul Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008b). La struttura del discorso segnato: dati su LIS, ASL e LSF, e nuove prospettive nel quadro di una grammatica dell’iconicità. In C. Bagnara, S. Corazza, S. Fontana, & A. Zuccalà (Eds.), I segni parlano. Prospettive di ricerca sulla Lingua dei Segni Italiana (pp. 43–53). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antinoro Pizzuto, E., Chiari, I., & Rossini, P. (2010). Representing Signed Languages: theoretical, methodological and pratical issues. In M. Pettorino, A. Giannini, I. Chiari, & F. M. Dovetto (Eds.), Spoken communication (pp. 144–176). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arbib, M. (2018) (Ed.). How the Brain Got Language: Towards a new road map. Interaction Studies, 19 (1).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. F. (1999). Original Signs : Gesture, Sign, and the Sources of Language. Washington D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. F., Stokoe, W. C., & Wilcox, S. (1995). Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attili, G., & Ricci Bitti, P. E. (1983). I gesti e i segni: la comunicazione non verbale in psicologia e neuropsicologia clinica e il linguaggio dei segni nei sordi. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auroux, S. (1994). La révolution technologique de la grammatisation. Liège: Mardaga.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bagnara, C., Chiappini, G., Conte, M. P., & Ottolini, M. (Eds.). (2000). Viaggio nella città invisibile. Atti del 2° Convegno nazionale sulla Lingua Italiana dei Segni. Genova, 25–27 settembre 1998. Tirrenia (Pisa): Edizioni del Cerro.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bagnara, C., Corazza, S., Fontana, S., & Zuccalà, A. (Eds.). (2008). I segni parlano. Prospettive di ricerca sulla Lingua dei Segni Italiana. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bagnara, C., Fontana, S., Tomasuolo, E., & Zuccalà, A. (Eds.). (2009). I segni raccontano. La Lingua dei Segni Italiana tra esperienze, strumenti e metodologie. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, C. (1977). Regulators and turn-taking in American Sign Language discourse. In L. Friendman (Ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language (pp. 215–236). NewYork: NewYork Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, C., & Padden, C. (1978). Focusing on the nonmanual components of American Sign Language. In P. Siple (Ed.), Research, Understanding language through sign language (pp. 27–57.). New York: New York Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, E., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 21 (3), 205–226.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1979). The Emergence of Symbols. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press Inc. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bébian, R. A. A. (1825). Mimographie: ou, essai d’écriture mimique, propre a  régulariser le langage des sourdsmuets. Paris: Louis Colas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bello, A., Caselli, M. C., Pettenati, P., & Stefanini, S. (2010). PinG–Parole in Gioco. Una prova di comprensione e produzione lessicale per la prima infanzia. Firenze: Giunti OS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bello, A., Onofrio, D., & Caselli, M. C. (2014). Nouns and predicates comprehension and production in children with Down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(4), 761–775.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bello, A., Stefanini, S., Rinaldi, P., Onofrio, D., & Volterra, V. (2020). Gestural, symbolic strategies in children with Down syndrome. Gesture, vol. 19 :2/3, pp.299–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergman, B., Boyes-Braem, P., Hanke, T., & Pizzuto, E. (2001). Sign transcription and database storage of sign information. Special issue of Sign Language & Linguistics, 4(1), 2.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernard, Y. (1993). Silent artists. In R. Fischer & H. Lane (Eds.), Looking back: a reader on the history of Deaf communities and their sign languages (pp. 75–88). Hamburg: Signum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berruto, G. (2003). Prima lezione di sociolinguistica. Roma/Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertone, C. (2003). L’iconografia sacra all’origine di un gruppo di segni nome nella Lingua Italiana dei Segni. La Voce Silenziosa, 21 , 11–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). La struttura del sintagma determinante nella Lingua dei segni Italiana, LIS. PhD Dissertation. University of Venice Ca’ Foscari.
(2008), Esiste un genere in LIS? Osservazioni sul tratto di forma. in C. Bagnara, S. Corazza, S. Fontana, & A. Zuccalà (Eds.), I segni parlano. Prospettive di ricerca sulla Lingua dei Segni Italiana (pp. 76–84). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Fondamenti di grammatica della Lingua dei segni Italiana. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Betto, R., Franchi, M. L., Massoni, P., Peruzzi, A. M., Rossini, P., & Santarelli, B. (1988). Abecedario della LIS. Regione Lazio Ass.to. I.C.A. e I.P.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bianchini, C. S. (2012). Analyse métalinguistique de l’émergence d’un système d’écriture des Langues des Signes: SignWriting et son application à la Langue des Signes Italienne (LIS). PhD Dissertation. Université de Paris VIII – Università di Perugia.
Bianchini, C. S., Di Renzo, A., Lucioli, T., Rossini, P., & Antinoro Pizzuto, E. (2012). Unità lessematiche e Strutture di Grande Iconicità nella Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS): nuovi dati e nuove metodologie di analisi, in Lessico e Lessicologia. Atti Del XLIV Congresso internazionale di Studi del La Società di linguistica italiana, 281–294. Viterbo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C. (1990). Un modèle d’analyse syntaxique” en grilles” pour les productions orales. Anuario de Psicologìa, 47 , 11–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bogliotti, C., & Isel, F. (2018). Does mouthing influence the comprehension of lexical signs in French Sign Language? Evidence from a priming experiment. Paper presented at International Society for Gesture Studies. Cape Town.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonsignori, C. (2013). La poesia segnata: una proposta d’analisi di Tempo di Lucia Daniele. (Thesis). Sapienza University of Rome.
Borghi, A. M., Capirci, O., Gianfreda, G., & Volterra, V. (2014). The body and the fading away of abstract concepts and words: a sign language analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 (811). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boschin, L., & Corazza, S. (1985). Materiale di lavoro. Corso di lingua italiana dei segni. Trieste: ENS Trieste, I.R.Fo.P.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boutet, D., Sallandre, M.-A., & Fusellier-Souza, I. (2010). Gestualité humaine et langues des signes: entre continuum et variations. Langage et Société, (1), 55–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyatzis, C. J., & Watson, M. W. (1993). Preschool Children’s Symbolic Representation of Objects through Gestures. Child Development, 64 (3), 729–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, P. (1981). Features of the handshape of American Sign Language. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990). Acquisition of the handshape of American Sign Language: A preliminary analysis. In V. Volterra & C. Erting (Eds.), From gesture to langauage in hearing and deaf children (pp. 107–127). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). The Changing Methods of Researching Signed Language. In A. Ender, A. Leemann, & B. Wälchli (Eds.), Methods in Contemporary Linguistics: Trends in Linguistics Series (pp. 411–438). Berlin-München-Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, P., & Braem, T. (2000). A pilot study of the expressive gestures used by classical orchestra conductors. In K. Emmorey e H. Lane (Eds) The Signs of Language Revisited (pp. 143–165). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, P., & Sutton-Spence, R. L. (2001). The Hands are the Head of the Mouth. The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Languages. Hamburg: Signum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, P., Pizzuto, E., & Volterra, V. (2002). The interpretation of signs by (hearing and deaf) members of different cultures, a metonymic model for assigning meaning to symbolic gestures. In R. Schulmeister & H. Reinitzer (Eds.), Progress in Sign Language Research. In Honor of Siegmund Prillwitz (pp. 187–219). Seedorf: Signum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, P., & Volterra, V. (in press). Through the Sign Language Glass: Changing and converging views in spoken and signed language research. In T. Janzen & B. Shaffer (Eds.), Signed Language and Gesture Research in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Branchini, C., & Donati, C. (2009). Fenomeni di simultaneità negli enunciati mistilingue: bilingui e bimodali a confronto. In Anna Cardinaletti, C. Cecchetto, & C. Donati (Eds.), Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS (pp. 219–235). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branchini, C., & Mantovan, L. (Eds.) (2020). A Grammar of Italian Sign Language (LIS). Venezia: Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branchini, C., Cardinaletti, A., Cecchetto, C., Donati, C., & Geraci, C. (2015). Wh-duplication in Italian Sign Language (LIS). In P. Rutkowski (Ed.), Signs and Structures. Formal Approaches to Sign Language Syntax (pp. 39–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branchini, C., & Donati, C. (2015). Gli enunciati mistilingui bimodali: un esperimento naturale. In M. E. Favilla & E. Nuzzo (Eds.), Grammatica applicata. Apprendimento, patologie, insegnamento (pp. 153–166). Milano: Officinaventuno (Studi Aitla).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branni, A. (2019). Avere una lingua la presenza culturale dei sordi in Italia. PhD dissertation. Sapienza University of Rome.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brennan, M. (2005). Conjoining Word and Image in British Sign Language (BSL) An Exploration of Metaphorical Signs in BSL. Sign Language Studies, 5(3), 360–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentari, D., Di Renzo, A., Keane, J., & Volterra, V. (2015). Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Sources of a Handshape Distinction Expressing Agentivity. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7 (1), 95–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2006). From Usage to Grammar : The Minds Response to Repetition. Language, 82 (4), 711–733. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camaioni, L., Volterra, V., & Bates, E. (1976). La comunicazione nel primo anno di vita. Torino: Boringhieri.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capirci, O., Iverson, J. M., Pizzuto, E., & Volterra, V. (1996). Gestures and words during the transition to two-word speech. Journal of Child Language, 23 (3), 645–673. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capirci, O., Contaldo, A., Caselli, M. C., & Volterra, V. (2005). From action to language through gesture: A longitudinal perspective. Gesture, 5 (1–2), 155–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capirci, O., & Volterra, V. (2008). Gesture and speech. Gesture, 8(1), 22–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capirci, O., Cristilli, C., De Angelis, V., & Graziano, M. (2011). Learning to use gesture in narratives: developmental trends in formal and semantic gesture competence. In G. Stam & M. Ishino (Eds.). In G. Stam & M. Ishino (Eds.), Integrating Gestures (John Benja, pp. 189–200). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capirci, O., Caselli, M.C. & Volterra, V. (2022) Interaction Among Modalities and Within Development. In A. Morgenstern & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.) Gesture in Language: Development Across the Lifespan, De Gruyter Mouton; American Psychological Association, (pp. 113–133). Berlin/ Washington, D.C.: De Gruyter Mouton/American Psychological Association. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capirci, O., Proietti, M. & Volterra, V. (in press) Searching for the roots of signs in children’s early gestures. Gesture, 21(1).
Capobianco, M., Antinoro Pizzuto, E., & Devescovi, A. (2017). Gesture–speech combinations and early verbal abilities. Interaction Studies, 18 (1), 55–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A., Cecchetto, C., & Donati, C. (2011). Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardona, G. R. (1976). Introduzione all’Etnolinguistica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988). Dizionario di linguistica. Roma: Armando Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caselli, M. C., & Volterra, V. (1990). From communication to language in hearing and deaf children. In V. Volterra & C. Erting (Eds.), From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children (pp. 263–278). Berlin: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Maragna, S., Pagliari Rampelli, L., & Volterra, V. (1994). Linguaggio e sordità: parole e segni per l’educazione dei sordi. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caselli, M. C., & Corazza, S. (Eds.). (1997). LIS. Studi, esperienze e ricerche sulla Lingua dei Segni in Italia. Atti del 1° Convegno nazionale sulla Lingua dei Segni. Trieste 13–15 ottobre 1995. Tirrenia (Pisa): Edizioni del Cerro.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Corazza, S., & Volterra, V. (1998). Linguaggio e sordità (videobook). Milano: Fabula: il Mondo dei Segni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Maragna, S., & Volterra, V. (2006). Linguaggio e Sordità: Gesti, segni e parole nello sviluppo e nell’educazione dei sordi. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Rinaldi, P., Stefanini, S., & Volterra, V. (2012). Early Action and Gesture “Vocabulary” and Its Relation With Word Comprehension and Production. Child Development, 83 (2), 526–542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Bello, A., Rinaldi, P., Stefanini, S., & Pasqualetti, P. (2015). Il Primo Vocabolario del Bambino: Gesti, Parole e Frasi. Valori di riferimento fra 8 e 36 mesi delle Forme complete e delle Forme brevi del questionario MacArthur-Bates CDI. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cattani, A., Floccia, C., Kidd, E., Pettenati, P., Onofrio, D., & Volterra, V. (2019). Gestures and Words in Naming: Evidence From Crosslinguistic and Crosscultural Comparison. Language Learning, 69 (3), 709–746. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cecchetto, C. (2012). Sentence types. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach, & B. Woll (Eds.), Sign language. An international handbook (pp. 292–315). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cecchetto, C., Geraci, C., & Zucchi, S. (2009). Another way to mark syntactic dependencies. The case for right peripheral specifiers in sign languages. Language, 85 (2), 278–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chiricò, D. (2014). Diamo un segno. Per una storia della sordità. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Church, R., Alibali, M., & Kelly, S. (2017). Why Gesture?: How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (2008). Metaphor, gesture and thought. In R. W. J. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 483–501). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (2016). Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review, 123 (3), 324–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coates, J., & Sutton-Spence, R. (2001). Turn-taking patterns in Deaf conversation. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5 (4), 507–529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conte, S. (2013). Toponimi e Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS): un’indagine su alcuni nomi di città. (Thesis). Sapienza University of Rome.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corazza, S. (1990). The Morphology of Classifier Handshapes in Italian Sign Language (LIS). In C. Lucas (Ed.), Sign Language Research. Theoretical Issues. (pp. 71–82). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). The history of sign language in Italian education of the Deaf. In R. Fischer & H. Lane (Eds.), Looking back: a reader on the history of Deaf communities and their sign languages (pp. 2019–2230). Hamburg: Signum-Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corazza, S., & Lerose, L. (2008). L’origine della Lingua dei Segni Italiana, variante triestina. In C. Bagnara, S. Corazza, S. Fontana, & A. Zuccalà (Eds.), I segni parlano. Prospettive di ricerca sulla Lingua dei Segni Italiana (pp. 132–140). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corazza, S., & Volterra, V. (2008). La lingua dei Segni Italiana: nessuna, una, centomila. In C. Bagnara, S. Corazza, S. Fontana, & A. Zuccalà (Eds.), I segni parlano. Prospettive di ricerca sulla Lingua dei Segni Italiana (pp. 19–29). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corballis, M. (2002). From hand to mouth: The origins of language. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corker, M. (1993). Dictionary of British Sign Language/English. London: Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cormier, K., Smith, S., & Sevcikova-Sehyr, Z. (2015). Rethinking constructed action. Sign Language & Linguistics, 18 (2), 167–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cormier, K., Smith, S., & Zwets, M. (2013). Framing constructed action in British Sign Language narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 55 119–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cresti, E. (2005). Per una nuova classificazione dell’illocuzione a partire da un corpus di parlato (LABLITA). In E. Burr (Ed.), Tradizione e innovazione: il parlato. Atti del VI Convegno internazionale SILFI. (pp. 233–246). Pisa: Cesati.
Cresti, E., & Moneglia, M. (2018). The illocutionary basis of information structure: The Language into Act Theory (L-AcT). In E. Adamou, K. Haude & M. Vanhove (Eds.), Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages (pp. 360–402). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cresti, E., Moneglia, M., & Panunzi, A. (2018). The LABLITA Corpus & the Language into Act Theory: analysis of Viterbo excerpts. In A. De Dominicis (Ed.), Speech audio archives: preservation, restoration, annotation, aimed at supporting the linguistic analysis. Contributi del Centro Linceo “Beniamino Segre”, vol. 137 (pp. 47–63). Roma: Bardi Edizioni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cristilli, C. (2000). Le parole per le parole nella Lingua Italiana dei Segni. Riflessioni sulla semiotica di una lingua dei segni. In C. Vallini (Ed.), I Logonimi Nelle Lingue e Nel Metalinguaggio: Atti Del Convegno. Napoli, Istituto Universitario Orientale (pp. 301–341). Roma: Il Calamo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Esistono i fonemi nelle lingue dei segni? Riflessioni sulla struttura del segno e sull’identit delle sue componenti. In C. Bagnara, S. Corazza, S. Fontana, & A. Zuccal (Eds.), I segni parlano. Prospettive di ricerca sulla Lingua dei Segni Italiana (pp.30–42). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuxac, C. (1996). Fonctions et structures de l’iconicité des langues des signes. PhD Dissertation. Université René-Descartes – Paris V.
(1999). French sign language: proposition of a structural explanation by iconicity. In A. Braffort, R. Gherbi, S. Gibet, D. Teil & J. Richardson (Eds.), International Gesture Workshop, (pp. 165–184). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). La langue des signes française (LSF). Les voies de l’iconicité (Faits de l). Paris: Ophrys, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuxac, C. & Sallandre, M.-A. (2007). Iconicity and arbitrariness in French Sign Language: Highly iconic structures, degenerated iconicity and diagrammatic iconicity. In E. Pizzuto, P. Pietrandrea, & R. Simone (Eds.), Verbal and signed languages: Comparing structures, constructs and methodologies (pp. 13–34). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuxac, C. & Antinoro Pizzuto, E. (2010). Émergence, norme et variation dans le langues des signes: Vers una redéfinition notionnelle. Langage et Société, 131 (1), 37–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Achille, P. (2003). L’italiano contemporaneo. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Agostino, M. (2007). Sociolinguistica dell’Italia contemporanea. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Jorio, A. (1832) La Mimica Degli Antichi Investigata Nel Gestire Napoletano. Napoli: Stamperia e Cartiera del Fibreno. Trans. and ed. with an Introduction and Notes by A. Kendon (2000). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Mauro, T. (2000). Vocalità, gestualità, lingue segnate e non segnate. In C. Bagnara, G. Chiappini, M. P. Conte & M. Ottolini (Eds.), Viaggio nella città invisibile. Atti del 2° Convegno nazionale sulla Lingua Italiana dei Segni (pp. 17–25). Tirrenia (Pisa): Edizioni del Cerro.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Prefazione. In T. Russo Cardona e V. Volterra. Le lingue dei segni: Storia e semiotica (pp. 9–14). Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Il linguaggio tra natura e storia. Milano: Mondadori Università.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Porcari Li Destri, G. & Volterra, V. (1995). Passato e presente: uno sguardo sull’educazione dei Sordi in Italia. Napoli: Guido Gnocchi Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deuchar, M. (1985). Implications of sign language research for linguistic theory. In W. C. Stokoe & V. Volterra (Eds.), SLR ‘83: proceedings of the III International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Rome, June 22–26, 1983 (pp. 239–246). Roma/Silver Spring, MD: IP-CNR/Linstok Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deutscher, G. (2010). Through the language lens. Why the world looks different in other languages. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Biase, C., & Hecker, H. (2009). Il Museo entra in Classe e la Classe entra nel Museo: programma di accesso all’arte e alla storia dell’arte per bambini sordi delle scuole primarie nell’ambito di una reale integrazione. In C. Bagnara, S. Fontana, E. Tomasuolo, & A. Zuccala (Eds.), I segni raccontano. La Lingua dei Segni Italiana tra esperienze, strumenti e metodologie (pp. 209–215.). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Renzo, A. (2006). Le produzioni narrative in LIS di bambini e ragazzi sordi. (Thesis). Sapienza University of Rome.
(2008). Esperienze e riflessioni sui metodi di trascrizione della LIS. In C. Bagnara, S. Corazza, S. Fontana, & A. Zuccalà (Eds.), I segni parlano. Prospettive di ricerca sulla Lingua dei Segni Italiana (pp. 159–170). Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Il lessico della LIS: stili di uso nel segnato. (Master Thesis). Sapienza University of Rome.
Di Renzo, A., Lamano, L., Lucioli, T., Pennacchi, B., Gianfreda, G., Petitta, G., Bianchini, C. S., Rossini, P. & Antinoro Pizzuto, E. (2011). Scrivere la LIS con il Sign Writing: manuale introduttivo. Roma: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione. ISBN 978-88-85059-28-3.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Renzo, A., Petitta, G., Lucioli, T., Bianchini, C. S., Gulli, T. & Rossini, P. (2012). L’inno di Mameli tradotto in Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS): un’analisi linguistica, in Coesistenze linguistiche nell’Italia pree postunitaria. In T. Telmon, G. Raimondi & L. Revelli (Eds.), Atti del XLV congresso internazionale di studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana (SLI) (pp. 219–233). Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. (2015). Ideophones and reduplication. Studies in Language, 39 (4), 946–970. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2015). Arbitrariness, Iconicity, and Systematicity in Language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 603–615. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dotter, F. (2018). Most Characteristic Elements of Sign Language Texts Are Intricate Mixtures of Linguistic and Non-linguistic Parts, Aren’t They? Colloquium: New Philologies, 3 (1), 1–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duranti, A. (1992). Etnografia del parlare quotidiano. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Etnopragmatica. La forza nel parlare. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dyer, O. (2020). Covid-19: Black people and other minorities are hardest hit in US. BMJ 369: m1483. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ebling, S., Camgöz, N. C., Boyes Braem, P., Tissi, K., Sidler-Miserez, S., Stoll, S., … (2018). SMILE Swiss German Sign Language Dataset. Proceedings of the 11th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference. (LREC 2018), (pp. 4221–4229). Miyazaki, Japan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, K. (Ed.) (2003). Perspectives on classifiers constructions in sign languages. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Iconicity as structure mapping. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 20130301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, E. (1993). Space in Danish Sign Language: The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: Signum-Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Point of View Expressed Through Shifters. In K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (Eds.), Language, Gesture and Space (pp. 143–164). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Epifano, M. (2003). Immaginario. Immagini per un abbecedario. Comunicare con i segni. Osmannoro (FI): Plan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erting, C. J., Johnson, R. C., Smith, D. L. & Snider, B. D. (Eds.) (1994). The Deaf Way: Perspectives from the International Conference on Deaf Culture. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Facchini, G. M. (1995). Commenti al Congresso di Milan. In G. Porcari Li Destri & V. Volterra (Eds.), Passato e presente: uno sguardo sull’educazione dei Sordi in Italia (pp. 17–43). Napoli: Gnocchi Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Facchini, G. M., & Rimondini, P. (1983). Scontri e incontri fra otoiatri e pedagoghi dei sordi nel 1800. In G. Attili & P. Ricci Bitti (Eds.), I gesti e i segni (pp. 213–213). Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanelli, F. (2018). Discorso interno e auto-comunicazione. Cinque saggi sulle forme del discorso verbale. Roma: Alpes Italia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanelli, F. & Volterra, V. (2020). Il continuum azione-gesto-segno-parola. Oltre il concetto di doppia articolazione, verso una prospettiva multimodale del linguaggio. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata (SILTA), XLIX/2, 116–133.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fenlon, J., Cormier, K. A., Rentelis, R., Schembri, A., Rowley, K., Adam, R., & Woll, B. (2014). BSL SignBank: A lexical database and dictionary of British Sign Language. [URL]
Ferrara, L., & Hodge, G. (2018). Language as description, indication, and depiction. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 (MAY), 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, R. & Lane, H. (Eds.). (1993) Looking back: a reader on the history of Deaf communities and their sign languages. Hamburg: Signum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foa, V., Gianfreda, G. & Pennacchi, B. (2016). Aspetti psicologici e sociali del bilinguismo. In B. Marziale & V. Volterra (Eds.), Lingua dei segni, società, diritti (pp. 71–110). Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Folchi, A. & Mereghetti, E. (1995). Tre educatori sordi italiani. In G. Porcari Li Destri e V. Volterra (Eds.), Passato e presente: uno sguardo sull’educazione dei Sordi in Italia (pp. 61–75). Napoli: Gnocchi Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Folchi, A. e Rossetti, R. (Eds.). (2007). Il colore del silenzio. Dizionario biografico internazionale degli artisti sordi. Milano: Mondadori Electa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontana, S. (1999). Italian Sign Language and Spoken Italian in contact: an analysis of interaction between deaf parents and hearing children. In E. Winston (Ed.), Storytelling and Conversation. Discourse in Deaf Communities (pp. 149–161). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Linguaggio e multimodalità. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Metalinguistic Awareness in Sign Language: Epistemological considerations. Rivista Di Psicolinguistica Applicata, 16 (2), 17–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Esiste la Cultura Sorda?. In F. Calzolaio, E. Petrocchi, M. Valisano, & A. Zubani (Eds.), In limine, esplorazioni attorno all’idea di confine (pp. 233–251). Venezia: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontana, S. & Fabbretti, D. (2000). Classificazione e analisi delle forme labiali in storie elicitate. In C. Bagnara, G. Chiappini, M. P. Conte & M. Ottolini (Eds.), Viaggio nella città invisibile. Atti del 2° Convegno nazionale sulla Lingua Italiana dei Segni (pp. 103–111). Tirrenia (Pisa): Edizioni del Cerro.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontana, S., Carratello, V., Fontana, S. (2008). Uno studio della LIS in Diacronia: alcune riflessioni. In C. Bagnara, S. Corazza, S. Fontana, A. Zuccalà (Eds.), Prospettive di Ricerca sulla Lingua dei Segni Italiana (pp. 123–131). Roma: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontana, S. & Zuccalà, A. (2012). Dalla Lingua dei sordi alla lingua dei segni: come cambia una comunità. In S. Fontana & E. Mignosi (Eds.), Segnare, Parlare, Intendersi: modalità e forme (pp. 31–49). Milano: Mimesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontana, S. & Cuccio, V. (2013). Metafora e metonimia tra linguistica cognitiva e teoria della pertinenza: uno studio sulle lingue dei segni primarie. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata, 13 (1), 83–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontana, S. & Volterra, V. (2014). Lingua, cultura e trasmissione: il caso della lingua italiana dei segni LIS. In E. Garavelli & E. Suomela-Härmä (Eds.), Dal manoscritto al web: canali e modalità di trasmissione dell’italiano. Tecniche, materiali e usi nella storia della lingua (pp. 769–783). Firenze: Franco Cesati.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontana, S. & Roccaforte, M. (2015). Lo strutturarsi e il destrutturarsi dei suoni nell’interazione con la lingua dei segni italiana (LIS). In M. Vayra, C. Avesani, & F. Tamburini (Eds.), Il farsi e il disfarsi del linguaggio. Acquisizione, mutamento e destrutturazione della struttura sonora del linguaggio (pp. 371–381). Napoli: Studi AISV.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontana, S., Corazza, S., Boyes Braem, P., & Volterra, V. (2015). Language research and language community change: Italian Sign Language 1981–2013. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2015(236), 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fornasiero, E. (2016). Evaluative Morphology in Italian Sign Language. PhD Dissertation. University of Venice Ca’ Foscari.
Franchi, M. L. & Maragna, S. (Eds.) (2013). Manuale dell’interprete della lingua dei segni italiana. Un percorso formativo con strumenti multimediali per l’apprendimento. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frishberg, N. (1975). Arbitrariness and Iconicity: Historical Change in American Sign Language. Language, 51 (3), 696–719. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcia, B. (2006). The methodological, linguistic and semiological bases for the elaboration of a written form of LSF (French Sign Language). In LREC 2006 – Workshop Proceedings (W-15), Second Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages (pp. 31–36). Paris: ELRAGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcia, B., & Sallandre, M.-A. (2013). Transcription systems for sign languages: A sketch of the different graphical representations of sign language and their characteristics. In M. Cornelia, C. Alan, F. Ellen, L. Silva, M. David, & T. Sedinha (Eds.), Volume 1 (pp. 1125–1140). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García, O., & Cole, D. (2014). Deaf gains in the study of bilingualism and bilingual education. In H. D. L. Bauman & J. J. Murray (Eds.), Deaf Gain. Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity (pp. 95–111). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geraci, C. (2012). Language Policy and Planning: The Case of Italian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 12(4), 494–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghetti, A. E. (2015). Deafhood. Le radici della cultura Sorda. (Thesis). University of Venice Ca’ Foscari.
Giacubbo, G. (2016). Ascoltare con gli occhi: Storia e metodi nell’integrazione della comunità sorda. (Thesis). Sapienza University of Rome.
Gianfreda, G. (2011a). Analisi Conversazionale e Indicatori Linguistici Percettivi e Cognitivi nella Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS). PhD Dissertation. University of Macerata.
(2011b). Un corpus di conversazioni in Lingua dei Segni Italiana attraverso videochat: una proposta per la loro trascrizione e analisi. In A. Cardinaletti, C. Cecchetto & C. Donati (Eds.), Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS (pp. 95–109). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gianfreda, G., Petitta, G., Bianchini, C. S., Di Renzo, A., Rossini, P., Lucioli, T.& , … Lamano, L. (2009). Dalla modalità faccia-a-faccia ad una lingua scritta emergente: nuove prospettive su trascrizione e scrittura della Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS). In C. Consani, C. Furiassi, F. Guazzell, & C. Perta (Eds.), Atti del IX Congresso dell’Associazione Italiana di Linguistica Applicata [AItLA]: Oralità/Scrittura. In memoria di Giorgio Raimondo Cardona (pp. 413–437). Perugia: Guerra Edizioni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gianfreda, G. & Di Renzo, A. (2011) Conversazioni in Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS): rappresentazione e traducibilità linguistica. In G. Massariello Merzagora & S. Dal Maso, (Eds.) I luoghi della traduzione. Le interfacce. Atti del XLIII Congresso internazionale di Studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana. (pp. 207–222). Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gianfreda, G., Volterra, V., & Zuczkowski, A. (2014). L’ espressione dell’ incertezza nella Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS). Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 9 (1), 199–234.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giuranna, R. & Giuranna, G. (2002). Sette poesie in Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS). CD. Tirrenia (PI): Edizioni del Cerro.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giustolisi, B., Mereghetti, E., & Cecchetto, C. (2017). Phonological blending or code mixing? Why mouthing is not a core component of sign language grammar. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 35 (2), 347–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Brentari, D. (2017). Gesture, sign, and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40 , 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwyn, S. W., Acredolo, L., & Brown, C. (2000). Impact of symbolic gesturing on early language development. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24 (2), 81–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grandi, N. (2017). Intensification processes in Italian: A survey. In M. Napoli & M. Ravetto, (Eds.), Exploring Intensification. Synchronic, Diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives (pp. 55–77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2001). The Right of Deaf Child to Grow Up Bilingual. Sign Language Studies 1(2):110-114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Bilingualism, biculturalism, and deafness. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13, 133-145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groce, N. E. (1985). Everyone Here Spoke Sign Language: Hereditary Deafness on Martha’s Vineyard. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosso, B. (1993). Iconicità ed arbitrarietà nella lingua dei segni italiana. Uno studio sperimentale. (MA Thesis). University of Padova.
Hawkins, S. (2004). Puzzles and patterns in 50 years of research on speech perception, In J. Slifka, S. Manuel & M. Matthies (Eds.), From sound to sense (pp. 223–246). Conference Proceedings. MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1963). The Problem of Universals in Language. In J. H. Greenberg (Eds). Universals of Language, (pp. 1–22); 2d ed. (1966) (pp. 1–29). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holt, L. & Lotto, A. (2010). Speech perception as categorization. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72 (5), 1218–1227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hwang, S.-O., Tomita, N., Morgan, H., Ergin, R., İlkbaşaran, D., Seegers, S., … Padden, C. (2017). Of the body and the hands: patterned iconicity for semantic categories. Language and Cognition, 9 (4), 573–602. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics – An Etnographic Approach. London: Tavistock Publications Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iverson, J. M. (2010). Developing language in a developing body: The relationship between motor development and language development, Journal of Child Language, 37 (2), 229–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iverson, J. M., Capirci, O., & Caselli, M. C. (1994). From communication to language in two modalities. Cognitive Development, 9 (1), 23–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iverson, J. M. & Thelen, E. (1999). Hand, mouth and brain. The dynamic emergence of speech and gesture. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(11–12), 19–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science, 16 (5), 367–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janzen, T. (2012). Lexicalization and grammaticalization. In M. Steinbach, R. Pfau, & B. Woll (Eds.), Handbook on Sign Languages (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Sciences (HSK) series). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 816–841.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Composite utterances in a signed language: Topic constructions and perspective-taking in ASL, Cognitive Linguistics, 28 (3), 511–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janzen, T., & Shaffer, B. (2002). Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticization. In R. Meier, K. Cormier, & D. Quinto-Pozos (Eds.), Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages (pp. 199–223). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarque, M. J. (2005). Double mapping in metaphorical expressions of thought and communication in Catalan Sign Language, Sign Language Studies, 5(3), 292–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, R. E. (1991). Sign Language, Culture & Community in a Traditional Yucatec Maya Village, Sign Language Studies, 73, 461–474. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, T. A. (1987). A preliminary signing dictionary of Australian Sign Language (Auslan). Adelaide: TAFE National Centre for Research and Development.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, T. (2008). Corpus linguistics and signed languages: no lemmata, no corpus. In O. Crassborn, Efthimiou, T., Hanke, Thoutenhoofd & I. Zwitserlood (Eds.), Proceesings of the Third Workshop om the Representation and Processing of Sign Language, LREC (pp. 82–87). ERLA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, T., & Schembri, A. (1999). On Defining Lexeme in a Signed Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2:2, 2 (2), 115–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, J., Durieux-Smith, A., & Bloom, K. (2005). Teaching gestural signs to infants to advance child development: A review of the evidence. First Language, 25 , 235–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, T. & Schembri, A. (2007). Australian Sign Language: An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jouison, P. (1995). Écrits sur la Langue des Signes Française, Édition établie par Brigitte Garcia, Paris: Éditions de l’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kegl, J. A. (2003). Pronominalization in American sign language. Sign language & linguistics, 6(2), 245-265.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and Speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M. R. Key (Ed.), The Relationship of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication (pp. 207–227). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1980a). A description of a deaf-mute sign language from the Enga Province of Papua New Guinea with some comparative discussion. Part I: The formational properties of Enga Signs. Semiotica, 31 (1–2), 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1980b). A description of a deaf-mute sign language from the Enga Province of Papua New Guinea with some comparative discussion. Part II: The semiotic functioning of Enga signs Semiotica , 31 (1–2), 81–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1980c). A description of a deaf-mute sign language from the Enga Province of Papua New Guinea with some comparative discussion. Part III: Aspects of utterance construction. Semiotica, 32(3–4), 245–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1983). The study of gesture: Some remarks on its history. J. N. Deely, M. D. Lenhart (Eds.), Semiotics 1981 (pp. 153–164). Boston: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988). Sign languages of Aboriginal Australia: Cultural, semiotic and communicative perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23 (3), 247–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Gesture: visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Semiotic diversity in utterance production and the concept of “language.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369 (1651), 20130293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017a). Languages as semiotically heterogenous systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40 , 30–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kimmelman, V., Klezovich, A., & Moroz, G. (2018). Iconicity patterns in Sign Languages. Retrieved July 25, 2018, from [URL]
Kirk, E., Howlett, N., Pine, K. J. & Fletcher, B. (2013). To sign or not to sign? The impact of encouraging infants to gesture on infant language and maternal mind-mindedness. Child Development. 84(2):574–590. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kisch, S. (2008). «Deaf discourse»: The social construction of deafness in a Bedouin community, Medical Anthropology, 27 (3), 283–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48 (1), 16–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kusters, A. & Sahasrabudhe, S. (2018). Language ideologies on the difference between gesture and sign. Language & Communication, 60 , 44–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kyle, J. & Woll, B. (1983). Language in sign: an international perspective on sign language. Second International Symposium of Sign Language Research. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 3: Cognitive and cultural factors. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, P. (2003). Understanding Deaf Culture, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lane, H. (Ed.) (1984a). The Deaf Experience: Classics in Language and Education. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1984b). When the Mind Hears: a History of the Deaf. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Note sulla sordità in memoria di Massimo Facchini. In G. Porcari Li Destri e V. Volterra (Eds.), Passato e presente: uno sguardo sull’educazione dei sordi in Italia (pp. 45–60). Napoli: Gnocchi Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Ethnicity, ethics, and the deaf-world. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(3), 291–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: a basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laudanna, A. & Volterra, V. (1991). Order of words, signs and gestures: A first comparison. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 135–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Launonen, K. (1996). Enhancing communication skills of children with Down syndrome: Early use of manual signs. In S. von Tetzchner & M. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and Alternative Communication (pp. 213–231). London: Whurr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leone, S. (2012). I brutti segni. Per una semantica dell’eufemismo in Lingua dei Segni Italiana. (Thesis). University of Rome Tor Vergata.
Lerose, L. (2012). Fonologia LIS, Tricase (LE): Libellula edizioni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loporcaro, M. (2009). Profilo linguistico dei dialetti italiani. Roma/Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lucas, C. (2001). Multicultural aspects of sociolinguistics in Deaf communities. Washington D.C: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lucas, C., & Valli, C. (1989). Language contact in the American Deaf community. In C. Lucas (Ed.), The sociolinguistics of the Deaf community (pp. 11–40). San Diego: San Diego Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lucioli, T., Lamano, L., & Gianfreda, G. (2008). I segni sulla carta: analisi e riflessioni sui primi testi di LIS scritta. In C. Bagnara, S. Corazza, F. S., & A. Zuccalà (Eds.), I segni parlano. Prospettive di ricerca sulla Lingua dei Segni Italiana (pp. 148–158). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Magarotto, C. (Ed.) (1995). Vocabolario della lingua gestuale italiana dei sordi. Roma: Armando Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maher, J. (1996). Seeing language in sign: The work of William C. Stokoe. Washington D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maragna, S., Di Renzo, A., Mottinelli, M. & Volterra, V. (2010). Gli studenti sordi all’Università: Lingua dei Segni Italiana e tecnologie per l’accesso. Educazione Permanente. Linguaggi, culture e formazione, 1, 67–85.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maragna, S., Roccaforte, M. & Tomasuolo, E. (Eds.) (2013). Una didattica innovativa per l’apprendente sordo. Con esempi di lezioni multimediali e tradizionali. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maragna, S. e Vasta, R. (Eds.) (2015). Il manuale dell’abate Silvestri. Le origini dell’educazione dei sordi in Italia. Roma: Bordeaux Edizioni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marentette, P., Pettenati, P., Bello, A., & Volterra, V. (2016). Gesture and Symbolic Representation in Italian and English-Speaking Canadian 2-Year-Olds. Child Development, 87 (3), 944–961. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markowicz, H. (1980). La communauté des sourds en tant que minorité linguistique. Coup d’Oeil Supplement, 24 , 1–10.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marras, A., Delfini, A., Maggiore, G., & Paolucci, V. (2019). Fratelli di Silenzio. La storia di Antonio Magarotto. Roma: il Treno soc. coop. soc.le onlus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marschark, M., Tang, G., & Knoors, H. (2014). Bilingualism and bilingual deaf education. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinet, A. (1960). Éléments de linguistique générale. Paris: Armand Colin. For the English Edition See Elements of general linguistics / with a foreword by L. R. Palmer and translated by Elisabeth Palmer. London: Faber, 1964.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez, R., & Wilcox, S. (2019). Pointing and placing: Nominal grounding in Argentine Sign Language. Cognitive Linguistics, 30 (1), 85–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marziale, B., & Volterra, V. (Eds.) (2016). Lingua dei segni, società, diritti. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Massaro, D. W. (2004). From multi-sensory integration to talking heads and language learning. In G. Calvert, C. Spence e B. E. Stein (Eds.), Handbook of Multisensory Processes (pp. 153–176). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazzoni, L. (2008). Classificatori e impersonamento nella Lingua dei Segni Italiana. Pisa: PLUS Pisa University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McIlvenny, P. (1991). Some thoughts on the study of sign language talk. In K. Sajavaara, D. Marsh & T. Keto (Eds.), Communication and Discourse across Cultures and Languages. AFinLA Yearbook 1991, (pp. 187–202). Jyväskylä: Publications de L’Association Finlandaise de Linguistique Applique (AFinLA).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Seeing conversations: Analysing sign language talk. In P. Have & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organisation of talk and embodied activities (pp. 129–150). Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKee, R., McKee, D., Smiler, K., & Pointon, K. (2007). Maori Signs: The construction of indigenous Deaf identity in New Zealand Sign Language. In D. Quinto-Pozos (Ed.), Signed Languages in Contact (pp. 31–84). Washington D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind : what gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). How language began: Gesture and speech in human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Gesture as a window onto mind and brain, and the relationship to linguistic relativity and ontogenesis. Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, 1, 28–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, R. (2016). Sign Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford Handbooks. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meir, I. (2010). Iconicity and metaphor: Constraints on metaphorical extension of iconic forms. Language, 86 (4), 865–896. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menegoi Buzzi-Donato, I. (1995). Storia della Scuola Tarra e dell’inserimento dei bambini sordi a Milano. In G. Porcari Li Destri e V. Volterra (Eds.), Passato e presente: uno sguardo sull’educazione dei Sordi in Italia (pp. 169–209). Napoli: Gnocchi Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Metzger, M. (1995). Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. In Ceil Lucas (Ed.), Sociolinguistics in Deaf communities (pp. 255–271). Washington D.C: Gallaudet University PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Metzger, M. & Bahan, B. (2001). Discourse analysis. In C. Lucas (Ed.), The sociolinguistics of Sign Languages (pp. 112–144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Micheloni, F. (1888). Un po’ di tutto intorno ai Sordo-Muti. Roma: Tipografia Agostiniana.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milroy, L., & Milroy, J. (1992). Social network and social class: Toward an integrated sociolinguistic model. Language in Society, 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2006). Video recording as the reflexive preservation-configuration of phenomenal features for analysis, in Video-analysis: Methodology and methods. In H. Knoblauch, B. Schnettler, J. Raab & H.-G. Soeffner (Eds.), Qualitative audiovisual data analysis in sociology (pp. 51–68). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Transcript variations and the indexicality of transcribing practices, «Discourse Studies, 9(6), 809–821. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moneglia, M. (2014). The variation of action verbs in multilingual spontaneous speech corpora. In T. Raso & H. Mello (Eds.), Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies (pp. 152–188). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montanini Manfredi, M., Fruggeri, L. e Facchini, M. (a cura di) [1979], Dal gesto al gesto. Il bambino sordo tra gestoe parola, Bologna, Cappelli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mottez, B. (1979). Ostinarsi contro il deficit significa aggravare l’handicap: l’esempio dei sordi. In M. Montanini Manfredi, L. Fruggeri, & M. Facchini (Eds.), Dal gesto al gesto: Il bambino sordo tra gesto e parola (pp. 245–262.). Bologna: Cappelli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C.. (2018). Gesture and sign: Cataclysmic break or dynamic relations? Frontiers in Psychology, 9 (SEP), 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., & Teßendor, S. (Eds.), (2014). Body–Language–Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murgiano, M. (2016). Un linguaggio in azione : alcune riflessioni sull’ uso dell’iconicità action-based nelle lingue dei Segni. Rivista Italiana Di Filosofia Del Linguaggio, SFL(2015), 92–106. Cite to nonCR Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Napoli, D. J. (2017). Iconicity chains in sign languages. In C. Bowern, L. Horn, & R. Zanuttini (Eds.), On looking into words (and beyond): Structures, Relations, Analyses (pp. 517–546). Berlin: Language Science Press. Cite to nonCR Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Napoli, D. J., Mai, M., & Gaw, N. (2011). Primary movement in sign languages: A study of six languages. Washington D.C.: Gallaudet University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newkirk, D. (1989). SignFont handbook. Redmond: Edmark Corporation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicodemus, B. (2009). Prosodic Mark-ers and Utterance Boundaries in American Sign Language Interpretation. Washington D.C.:Gallaudet University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicolai, F. (2002). Alcuni processi di morfologia derivazionale. In F. Favilla (Ed.), LIS, in Comunicazione e sordità (pp. 57–66). Pisa: Edizioni Plus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núñez, R., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time. Cognitive Science, 30 (3), 401–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Occhino, C. (2017). An Introduction to Embodied Cognitive Phonology: Claw-5 Hand-shape Distribution in ASL and Libras. Complutense Journal of English Studies, 25 , 69–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Occhino, C., Anible, B., Wilkinson, E., & Morford, J. P. (2017). Iconicity is in the eye of the beholder. Gesture, 16 (1), 100–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1985). Variation and error: A sociolinguistic approach to language acquisition in Samoa. In D. I. Slobin & N. J. Hillsdale (Eds.), The crosslinsguistic Studies of Language Acquisition I: The Data (pp. 783–838). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elbaurm Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, E., Schegloff, E., & Thompson, S. (1996). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the world. London: Methuen. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, G., Sumer, B., & Ozyurek, A. (2014). Type of iconicity matters : Bias for action-based signs in sign language acquisition. In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2914). (pp. 1114–1119). Austin, Tx: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Overton, W. F. & Jackson, J. P. (1973). The representation of imagined objects in action sequences: a developmental study. Child Development, 44(2), 309–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş., Adamson, L. B., & Dimitrova, N. (2016). Early deictic but not other gestures predict later vocabulary in both typical development and autism. Autism, 20 (6), 754–763. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş., Adamson, L. B., Dimitrova, N., & Baumann, S. (2017). Early gesture provides a helping hand to spoken vocabulary development for children with autism, down syndrome, and typical development. Journal of Cognition and Development, 18 (3), 325–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ozyurek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T. (2008). Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology, 44 (4), 1040–1054. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padden, C. (1986). Verbs and role-shifting in American Sign Language. In C. Padden (Ed.), Proceedings of the fourth national symposium on sign language research and teaching (pp. 44–57). Silver Spring (MD): National Association of the Deaf Silver Spring.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padden, C. & Humphries, T. (1988). Deaf in America: Voices from a Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Inside Deaf Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padden, C. A., Meir, I., Hwang, S.-O., Lepic, R., Seegers, S., & Sampson, T. (2013). Patterned iconicity in sign language lexicons. Gesture, 13 (3), 287–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padden, C. A., Hwang, S. O., Lepic, R., & Seegers, S. (2015). Tools for Language: Patterned Iconicity in Sign Language Nouns and Verbs. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7 (1), 81–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palfreyman, N., Sagara, K. & Zeshan, U. (2015). Methods in carrying out language typological research. In E. Orfanidou, B. Woll & G. Morgan (Eds.), Research Methods in Sign Language Studies: A Practical Guide (pp. 173–192). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pareek, M., Bangash, M. N., Pan, D., Minhas, J., Hanis, W., & Kunti, K. (2020). Ethnicity and COVID-19: an urgent public health research priority. Lancet, 395, 1421–1422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parrella, V. (2002). Il ruolo del contesto nella comprensione della lingua italiana dei segni. (MA Thesis). University of Naples Federico II.
Pennacchi, B. (2008). Metter nero su bianco la LIS: alcune osservazioni e riflessioni. In C. Baghara, S. Corazza, S. Fontana, & A. Zuccalà (Eds.), I segni parlano. Prospettive di ricerca sulla Lingua dei Segni Italiana. (pp. 140–147) Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peracchio, G. (2009). Le guide turistiche sorde. In C. Bagnara, G. Chiappini, M. P. Conte & M. Ottolini (Eds.), Viaggio nella città invisibile. Atti del 2° Convegno nazionale sulla Lingua Italiana dei Segni (pp. 259–262). Tirrenia (Pisa): Edizioni del Cerro.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perniss, P. (2018). Why we should study multimodal language. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 (1109). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perniss, P., & Vigliocco, G. (2014). The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peruzzi, A. M., Rossini, P., Russo, T. & Volterra, V. (2000), Segni nome ed identità personale nella LIS. In Bagnara, C., Chiappini, G., Conte, M. P., & Ottolini, M. (Eds.), (2000). Viaggio nella città invisibile. Atti del 2 Convegno nazionale sulla Lingua Italiana dei Segni. Genova, 25–27 settembre 1998. (pp. 488–494). Tirrenia (Pisa): Edizioni del Cerro.
Petitta, G. (2011). L’articolazione del discorso in Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS) e in contesti traduttivi dall’italiano. PhD Dissertation. Università per Stranieri di Siena.
(2012). Sordo, sordomuto e non udente nella stampa italiana contemporanea, Bollettino di italianistica. Rivista di critica, storia letteraria, filologia e linguistica, 2, 171–183.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petitta, G., Di Renzo, A., Chiari, I., & Rossini, P. (2013). Sign Language Representation: new approaches to the study of Italian Sign language (LIS). In L. Meurant, A. Sinte, M. Van Herreweghe & M. Vermeerbergen (Eds.), Sign Language Research, Uses and Practices. Crossing Views on Theoretical and Applied Sign Language Linguistics. Sign Language and Deaf Communities (pp.137–158). Nijmegen: Boston/Berlin: Ishara Press and De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petitta, G., Di Renzo, A. & Chiari, I. (2015). Evaluative Morphology in Sign Languages. In N. Grandi & L. Körtvélyessy (Eds.), The Edinburgh Handbook of Evaluative Morphology (pp. 155–169). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pettenati, P., Stefanini, S. & Volterra, V. (2010). Motoric characteristics of representational gestures produced by young children in a naming task, Journal of Child Language», 37 (4), 887–911. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pettenati, P., Sekine, K., Congestrì, E. & Volterra, V. (2012). A Comparative Study on Representational Gestures in Italian and Japanese Children, Journal of Non Verbal Behaviour, 36, 149–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pettorino, M., Giannini, A. & Dovetto, F. M. (Eds.). (2010). La comunicazione parlata 3. Atti del terzo congresso internazionale del Gruppo di Studio sulla Comunicazione Parlata, vol. I, Napoli: Università degli Studi di Napoli L’Orientale.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1945). La formation du symbole chez l’enfant, Neuchâtel-Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé; trad. it. 1972 La formazione del simbolo nel bambino. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pietrandrea, P. (1995). Analisi Semiotica dei Dizionari della Lingua Italiana dei Segni. (Thesis). Sapienza University of Rome.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). I dizionari della LIS: analisi qualitative e quantitative. In M. C. Caselli e S. Corazza (Eds.), LIS. Studi, esperienze e ricerche sulla lingua dei Segni in Italia. Atti del 1° Convegno Nazionale sulla Lingua dei Segni (pp. 255–259). Tirrenia (Pisa): Edizioni del Cerro.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). L’interazione complessa di iconicità e arbitrarietà nel lessico LIS. In C. Bagnara, G. Chiappini, M. P. Conte e M. Ottolini (Eds.), Viaggio nella città invisibile. Atti del 2° Convegno nazionale sulla Lingua Italiana dei Segni (pp. 38–49). Tirrenia (Pisa): Edizioni del Cerro.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Iconicity and Arbitrariness in Italian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 2 (3), 296–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). L’approccio socio-semiotico alle lingue dei segni. Una testimonianza. In A. Thornton e M. Voghera (Eds.), Per Tullio De Mauro (pp. 265–285). Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(in press). What is a language? A socio-semiotic approach to signed and verbal languages. In Terry Janzen and Barbara Shaffer (Eds.), Signed Language and Gesture Research in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Pietrandrea, P., & Russo, T. (2007). Diagrammatic and imagic hypoicons in signed and verbal language. In E. Pizzuto, P. Pietrandrea, & R. Simone (Eds.), Verbal and Signed Languages. Comparing Structures, Constructs and Methodologies (pp. 35–56). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pigliacampo, R. (2001). Il genio negato. Giacomo Carbonieri psicolinguista sordomuto del XIX secolo. Siena: Cantagalli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinna, P., Rampelli, L., Rossini, P. & Volterra, V. (1990). Written and unwritten records from a residential school for the deaf in Rome. Sign Language Studies, 67, 127–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinna, P., Pagliari Rampelli, L., Rossini, P. & Volterra, V. (1993). Written and unwritten records from a residential school for the Deaf in Rome. In R. Fischer & H. Lane (Eds.), Looking back: a reader on the history of Deaf communities and their sign languages (pp. 349–368). Hamburg: Sigum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). Written and Unwritten History from a Residential School for the Deaf in Rome, Italy. In C. J. Erting, R. Johnson, D. Smith & B. D. Snider (Eds.), The Deaf Way. Perspectives from the International Conference on Deaf Culture (pp. 194–202). Washington D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinto, M. A., & Volterra, V. (Eds.) (2008). Spoken languages / vocal languages bilingualism: Educational and psycholinguistic issues. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata, VIII, 3, 9–17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinto, M., & Rinaldi, P. (Eds.) (2016). Metalinguistic awareness and bimodal bilingualism: Studies on deaf and hearing subjects. Rivista Di Psicolinguistica Applicata, 2 (16).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E. (1986a). Italian Sign Language. In J. Van Cleeve (Ed.), Gallaudet Encyclopedia of Deaf People and Deafness, Vol. 3 (pp. 85–89). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1986b). The verb system of Italian Sign Language. In B. T. Tervoort (Ed.), Signs of Life (pp. 17–31). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Coarticolazione e multimodalità nelle lingue dei segni: dati e prospettive di ricerca dallo studio della Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS). In G. Marotta & N. Nocchi (Eds.), La coarticolazione. Atti delle XIII Giornate di Studio del Gruppo di Fonetica Sperimentale (pp.59–77). Pisa: Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Deixis, anaphora and person reference in signed languages. In E. Pizzuto, P. Pietrandrea, & R. Simone (Eds.), Verbal and Signed Languages: comparing structures, constructs and methodologies (pp. 275–308). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E., Cameracanna, E., Corazza, S., & Volterra, V. (1995). Terms for spatio-temporal relations in Italian Sign language. In R. Simone (Ed.), Iconicity in Language (pp. 237–256). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E., Giuranna, E., & Gambino, G. (1990). Manual and non manual morphology in Italian Sign Language: grammatical constraints and discourse structure. In C. Lucas (Eds.), Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues (pp. 83–102). Washington D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E. & CorazzaVerbal and Signed languages , S. (1997). Morfologia dei nomi e classificatori nella Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS). In M. C. Caselli & S. Corazza (Eds.), LIS: Studi, esperienze e ricerche sulla lingua dei Segni in Italia. Atti del 1° Convegno Nazionale sulla Lingua dei Segni (pp. 34–41). Tirrenia (Pisa): Edizioni del Cerro.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E. & Corazza, S. (2000). Segni senza parole: osservazioni sui «classificatori» della LIS. In C. Bagnara, G. Chiappini, M. P. Conte & M. Ottolini (Eds.), Viaggio nella città invisibile. Atti del 2° Convegno nazionale sulla Lingua Italiana dei Segni (pp. 50–59). Tirrenia (Pisa): Edizioni del Cerro.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E., & Pietrandrea, P. (2001). The notation of signed texts: open questions and indications for further research. Sign Language and Linguistics, (Special Issue – Sign Transcription and Database Storage of Sign Information), 4: 1/2, 29–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E., Rossini, P., Russo, T. & Wilkinson, E. (2005). Formazione di parole visivo-gestuali e classi grammaticali nella Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS): dati disponibili e questioni aperte. In M. Grossmann & A. Thornton (Eds.), La Formazione delle parole. XXXVII Congresso internazionale di studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana S.L.I, L’Aquila, 25–27 settembre 2003 (pp. 443–463). Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E., & Volterra, V. (2000). Iconicity and transparency in sign languages: A cross-linguistic cross-cultural view. In K. Emmorey & H. Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 261–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elbaurm Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E., Rossini, P., & Russo, T. (2006). Representing signed languages in written form: questions that need to be posed. In C. Vettori, LREC 2006–Workshop Proceedings (W-15): Second Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages, (pp. 1–6). Paris: ELRA. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E., Pietrandrea, P., & Simone, R. (2007). Verbal and Signed languages: Comparing structure, constructs and methodologies. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polich, L. (2006). The emergence of the deaf community in Nicaragua. Washington D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Porcari Li Destri, G., & Volterra, V. (1995). Passato e presente. Uno sguardo all’educazione dei sordi in Itali. Napoli: Gnocchi Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Presneau, J.-R. (1998). Signes et Institution des sourds. XVIII-XIX siècle. Seyssel: Champ Vallon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prillwitz, S., Leven, R., Zienert, H., Hanke, T., & Henning, J. (1989). Hamnosys: Version 2.0; Hamburg notation system for sign languages; an introductory guide. Hamburg: Signum-Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radutzky, E. (1992). Dizionario bilingue elementare della Lingua dei Segni Italiana LIS. Roma: Edizioni Kappa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). La configurazione, in LIS. In M. C. Caselli & S. Corazza (Eds.), LIS Studi, esperienze e ricerche sulla lingua dei Segni in Italia. Atti Del 1° Convegno nazionale sulla lingua dei segni (pp. 87–111). Tirrenia (Pisa): Edizioni del Cerro.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000) Cambiamento storico della Lingua dei Segni. in Bagnara, C., Chiappini, G., Conte, M. P., & Ottolini, M. (Eds.). (2000). Viaggio nella citt invisi-bile. Atti del 2 Convegno nazionale sulla Lingua Italiana dei Segni. Genova, 25–27 settembre 1998. (pp. 120–139). Tirrenia (Pisa): Edizioni del Cerro.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Il cambiamento fonologico storico della Lingua dei Segni Italiana. In C. Bertone & A. Cardinaletti (Eds.), Alcuni capitoli della grammatica della LIS (pp. 17–42). Venezia: Libreria Editrice CafoscarinaGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radutzky, E., Canigiani, E. & Mottinelli, M. (2011). Il cambiamento diacronico morfo-fonologico della Lingua dei Segni Italiana, in A. Cardinaletti, Cecchetto, C., & Donati, C. (Eds.), Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS. (pp 171–188). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ricci Bitti, S. (2016). I media digitali: innovazioni e opportunità per i sordi. (Thesis). Sapienza University of Rome.
Rinaldi, P., & Caselli, M. C. (2014). Language development in a bimodal bilingual child with cochlear implant: A longitudinal study. Bilingualism, 17 (4), 798–809. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rinaldi, P., Caselli, M. C., Di Renzo, A., Gulli, T. & Volterra, V. (2014). Sign vocabulary in deaf toddlers exposed to sign language since birth, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 19 (3), 303–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rinaldi, P., Caselli, M. C., Lucioli, T., Lamano, L., & Volterra, V. (2018). Sign Language Skills Assessed Through a Sentence Reproduction Task. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 23 (4), 408–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rinaldi, P., Sanalitro, C., & Caselli, M. C. (2019). Bilinguismo tra lingue vocali e lingue dei segni. In M. C. Levorato & A. Marini (Eds.), Il bilinguismo (pp. 161–176). Trento: Erickson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, M. (2009). Il ragno e la tela. Studi di Glottodidattica, 3 (3), 106–117.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roccaforte, M. (2016). Studi linguistici sulle componenti orali della lingua dei segni italiana (LIS). PhD Dissertation. Sapienza University of Rome.
(2018). Le componenti orali della lingua dei segni italiana: Analisi linguistica, indagini sperimentali e implicazioni glottodidattiche. Roma: Sapienza Università Edizioni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roccaforte, M. & Volterra, V. (2016). La lingua dei segni italiana. In S. Lubello (Ed.), Manuale di linguistica italiana (pp. 709–728). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roccaforte, M., Gulli, T. & Volterra, V. (2018). La polemica tra un otoiatra laico, gli allievi «sordo-muti» e gli educatori clericali alla fine del 1800. Una storia d’altri tempi?. In F. M. Dovetto (Ed.), Tra medici e linguisti. Lingua e patologia: le frontiere interdisciplinari del linguaggio (pp. 329–364). Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roma, A. (2014). Il teatro silenzioso: appunti e riflessioni intorno al teatro dei sordi. Biblioteca Teatrale, 111–112, 91–103.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romeo, O. (1991). Dizionario dei segni: la lingua dei segni in 1400 immagini. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). La grammatica dei segni. La Lingua dei segni in 13000 immagini e 150 frasi. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Dizionario tematico dei segni. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosato, G. (Ed.) (2011). Laboratorio ZERO: 1977–2008. Roma: Edizioni Kappa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenblum, L. D. (2005). The primacy of multimodal speech perception. In D. Pisoni & R. Remez (Eds.), Handbook of Speech Perception (pp. 51–78). London: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russo, T. (1997). Segni nome e identità culturale nella comunità sorda in Italia. In A. Zuccalà (Ed.), Cultura del gesto e cultura della parola. Viaggio antropologico nel mondo dei sordi (pp. 69–83). Roma: Meltemi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004a). Iconicity and productivity in sign language discourse: An analysis of three LIS discourse registers. Sign Language Studies, 4 (2), 164–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004b). La mappa poggiata sull’isola: iconicità e metafora nelle lingue dei segni e nelle lingue vocali. Rende (Cosenza): Università della Calabria centro editoriale e librario.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). A crosslinguistic, cross-cultural analysis of metaphors in two Italian Sign Language (LIS) registers. Sign Language Studies, 5 (3), 333–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russo, T., Giuranna, R., & Pizzuto, E. (2001). Italian Sign Language (LIS) poetry: Iconic properties and structural regularities. Sign Language Studies 2(1), 84–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russo, T. & Volterra, V. (2005). Comment on Children Creating Core Properties of Language: Evidence from an Emerging Sign Language in Nicaragua. Science, n. 309 (5731), 56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russo Cardona, T., & Volterra, V. (2007). Le lingue dei segni, storia e semiotica. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sabria, R. (Ed.) (2006). Les langues des signes (LS): recherches sociolinguistiques et linguistiques. GLOTTOPOL Revue de Sociolinguistique En Ligne, 7 .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sala, L. & Sala, R. (2006). “Io ricordo…Testimonianza di Luigi Presotto”, in Rosselli, R. (Eds.), Dall’Associazione Padovana di Mutuo Soccorso fra Sordomuti alla sezione patavina dell’Ente Nazionale Sordomuti 1926 – 2006: da ottant’anni al servizio dei sordi, ENS Padova 2006.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sala, R. (2005). L’interprete di lingua dei segni: orecchio per i sordi e voce per gli udenti. (Thesis). University of Padova.
(2010). Consegnami la tua storia: problemi metodologici nelle interviste narrative con persone sorde. (MA Thesis). University of Padova.
Sallandre, M.-A. (2003). Les unités du discours en langue des signes française. Tentative de catégorisation dans le cadre d’une grammaire de l’iconicité. PhD Dissertation. University Paris VIII.
(2007). Simultaneity in French Sign Language Discourse. In M. Vermeerbergen, L. Leeson & O. A. Crasborn (Eds.), Simultaneity in Signed Languages: Form and function (pp. 103–125). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Compositionnalité des unités sémantiques en langues des signes.Perspective typologique et développementale, Thèse d’habilitation à diriger des recherches, University Paris VIII, Saint-Denis, 2 vol.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, W. (2010). Prosody and syntax in sign languages. Transactions of the Philological Society. 108 (3). 298–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, W., Meir, I., Padden, C. & Aronoff, M. (2005). The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102 (7). 2661–2665. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, W., Aronoff, M., Padden, C. & Meir, I. (2014). Language emergence. In J. Sindell, P. Kockelman & N. Enfield (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp. 250–284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santoro, M. (2018). Compounds in sign languages: The case of Italian and French Sign Language. PhD Dissertation. École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris.
Saussure, F. De. (1967). Corso di linguistica generale, edited and translated by Tullio de Mauro [from the 1922 edition]. Roma/Bari: Laterza. For the English edition see second translation by Roy Harris, Course in General Linguistics. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, 1983.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Savy, R. (2001). L’interfaccia tra livelli di analisi del parlato: rapporti tra riduzioni segmentali e schemi prosodici. In F. Albano Leoni, E. Stenta Krosbakken, R. Sornicola, C. Stromboli (Eds.), Dati empirici e teorie linguistiche. Atti Del XXXIII Congresso Internazionale Di Studi Della Società Di Linguistica Italiana, (pp. 309–328). Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in Interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambreidge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schembri, A. (2003). Rethinking ‘Classifiers’ in Signed Languages. InEmmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages (pp. 13–44). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schembri, A., & Johnston, T. (2006). Sociolinguistic variation in Australian Sign Language project: Grammatical and lexical variation. Paper presented at TISRL 9, December 6–9, Florianopolis, Brasil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schembri, A., Cormier, K., Johnston, T., McKee, D., McKee, R. & Woll, B. (2010). Sociolinguistic variation in British, Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages. In D. Brentari (Ed.), Sign languages. (pp. 479–501). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schembri, A., Jones, C., & Burnham, D. (2005). Comparing Action Gestures and Classifier Verbs of Motion: Evidence From Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and Nonsigners’ Gestures Without Speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10 (3), 272–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schembri, A. & Cormier, K. & Fenlon, J. (2018) “Indicating verbs as typologically unique constructions: Reconsidering verb ‘agreement’ in sign languages”, Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3(1), p.89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schembri, A., Fenlon, J., Cormier, K. & Johnston, T. (2018). Sociolinguistic Typology and Sign Languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 (200), 1–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Segretariato Sociale RAI (Eds.) (2002). Scripta volant. La Rai per i sordi, Roma, Rai Eri.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Senghas, A., Kita, S. & Ozyürek, A. (2004). Children creating core properties of language: evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science, 305 (5691), 1779–1782.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidhu, D. M., Westbury, C., Hollis, G., & Pexman, P. M. (2021). Sound symbolism shapes the English language: The maluma/takete effect in English nouns. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 28(4), 1390–1398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simone, R. (1990). Fondamenti di Linguistica. Roma/Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (2005). Issues of Linguistic Typology in the Study of Sign Language Development of Deaf Children. In B. Schick, M. Marschark, & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Advances in the Sign-Language Development of Deaf Children (pp. 20–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Breaking the Molds: Signed Languages and the Nature of Human Language. Sign Language Studies, 8 (2), 114–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Typology and channel of communication: Where do signed languages fit in, in Language typology and historical contingency. In B. Bickel, L. Grenoble, D. Peterson, & A. Timberlake (Eds.), Honor of Johanna Nichols (pp. 47–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I., Hoiting, N., Anthony, M., Biederman, Y., Kuntze, M., Lindert, R., & Weinberg, A. (2001). Sign language transcription at the level of meaning components: The Berkeley Transcription System (BTS). Sign Language & Linguistics, 4(1–2), 63–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I., Hoiting, N., Kuntze, M., Lindert, R., Weinberg, A., Pyers, J., & Thumann, H. (2003). A cognitive/functional perspective on the acquisition of “classifiers”. In Emmorey (Eds.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp. 271–296), New York/London: Taylor & Francis Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sonnenstrahl, D. M. (2002). Deaf Artists in America: Colonial to Contemporary. San Diego: Dawn Sign Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sparaci, L., & Volterra, V. (2017). Hands shaping communication: From gestures to signs. In M. Bertolaso, & N. Di Stefano (Eds.), The Hand. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 38. (pp. 29–54). Berlin: Springer, Cham. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanini, S., Bello, A., Caselli, M. C., Iverson, J. M., & Volterra, V. (2009). Co-speech gestures in a naming task: Developmental data. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24 (2), 168–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sternberg, M. L. (1998). American Sign Language Dictionary. New York: Perennial Library.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokoe, W. C. (1960). Sign Language Structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf. Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers, 8 , 1–78.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1969). Sign Language Diglossia. Studies in Linguistics, 21 , 27–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Semantic phonology. Sign Language Studies, 71 (1), 107–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokoe, W. C., Casterline, D. C., & Croneberg, C. G. (1965). A Dictionary of American Sign Language on Linguistics Principles. Silver Springs: Arcadia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokoe, W. C., & Volterra, V. (Eds.) (1985). SLR’83: Proceedings of the III. In International Symposium on Sign Language Research. Rome/ Silver Spring Washington D.C.: IP/CNR/Linstok Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Styles, S. J., & Gawne, L. (2017). When does maluma/takete fail? Two key failures and a meta-analysis suggest that phonology and phonotactics matter. i-Perception, 8 (4), 2041669517724807. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Supalla, S. J. (1992). The book of name signs: Naming in American Sign Language. San Diego: Dawn Sign Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Supalla, T. (1986). The Classifier System in American Sign Language.” In Graig, C. (Eds.), Noun classifier and categorization: Proceedings of a symposiu on categorizazion and noun classification (pp 181–214). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Jhon Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sutton-Spence, R., & Boyes Braem, P. (2013). Comparing the Products and the Processes of Creating Sign Language Poetry and Pantomimic Improvisations. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 37 (4), 245–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: Vols. I–II. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices: repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taub, S. F. (2001). Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thornton, A. M. (2008). Italian verb reduplicative action nouns. Lingue e linguaggio, 7(2), 209–232.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): a non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology. In M. Maiden, J. C. Martin, M. Smith, Maria Goldbach & M.O. Hinzelin (Eds.), Morphological Autonomy: Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 358–381.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasuolo, E., Bonsignori, C., Rinaldi, P., & Volterra, V. (2020). The representation of action in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Cognitive Linguistics, 31 (1), 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasuolo, E., Gulli, T., Volterra, V., & Fontana, S. (2021). The Italian Deaf Community at the Time of Coronavirus. Frontiers in Sociology, 5 (January), 1–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trovato, S. (2013). Insegno in segni. Linguaggio, cognizione, successo scolastico per gli studenti sordi. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trovato, S. & Folchi, A. (Eds.) (2022) The Social condition of Deaf People. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974). Sociolinguistics. An Introduction. London: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vermeerbergen, M., Leeson, L., & Crasborn, O. A. (Eds.). (2007). Simultaneity in signed languages. Form and function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Violi, P. (2013). Le tematiche del corporeo nella Semantica Cognitiva. In L. Gaeta & L. Silvia (Eds.), Introduzione alla linguistica cognitiva (pp. 57–76). Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voghera, M. (2010). The Constants of Spoken Discourse: what evidence for grammatical models? In Pettorino, M., Albano Leoni, F., Chiari, I., Dovetto, F. M. & Giannini, A. (Eds.), Spoken Communication between Symbolics and Deixis (pp. 77–112). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Dal parlato alla grammatica. Costruzione e forma dei testi spontanei. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). What we learn about language from Spoken Corpus Linguistics?. Caplletra. Revista Internacional de Filologia, (69), 125–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022) How speech mode emerges in language. In M. Voghera (Ed.), From Speaking to Grammar, (pp. 21–56). Berlin: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volterra, V. (2011). La ricerca sulla lingua dei segni in Italia: passato, presente e prospettive future. In A. Cardinaletti, C. Cecchetto e C. Donati (Eds.), Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS (pp. 27–44). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Il passato per aiutarci a capire meglio il presente. In B. Marziale e V. Volterra (Eds.), Lingua dei segni, società, diritti (pp. 19–51). Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Ed.). (1981). I segni come parole: la comunicazione dei sordi. Torino: Boringhieri.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Ed.). (1987). La lingua italiana dei segni. La comunicazione visivogestuale dei sordi. Bologna: Il MulinoGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2014). Chi ha paura della lingua dei segni?. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo, 3/2014, 425–478.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volterra, V., Laudanna, A., Corazza, S., Radutzky, E. & Natale, F. (1984). Italian Sign Language: The order of elements in the declarative sentence. In F. Loncke, P. Boyes Braem & Y. Lebrun (Eds.), Recent Research on European Sign Languages (pp. 19–48). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger B.V.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volterra, V. & Erting, C. J. (Eds.) (1990). From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children. Berlin: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volterra, V., Capirci, O., Caselli, M. C., Rinaldi, P., & Sparaci, L. (2017). Developmental evidence for continuity from action to gesture to sign/word. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 8 (1), 13–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volterra, V., Capirci, O., Rinaldi, P., & Sparaci, L. (2018). From action to spoken and signed language through gesture. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 19(1–2), 216–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation: An organismic-developmental approach to language and the expression of thought. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitney, W. D. (1875). The Life and Growth of Language. In The Internatinal Scientific Series (I). London: Henry S. King & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilbur, R. & Petitto, L. (1983). Discourse structure in American Sign Language conversations (or, how to know a conversation when you see one). Discourse Processes, 6 (3), 225–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, P. P. (2000). Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). What do you think? Metaphor in thought and communication domains in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 5 (3), 267–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Constructs of the mind: Cross-Linguistic contrast of metaphor in verbal and signed languages. In E. Pizzuto, P. Pietrandrea e R. Simone (Eds.), Verbal and Signed Languages: Comparing Structures, Constructs and Methodologies (pp. 251–272.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, S., Rossini, P., & Pizzuto, E. (2010). Grammaticalization in sign languages. In D. Brentari (Ed.), Sign Languages – A Cambridge Survey (pp. 332–354). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, S., & Xavier, A. N. (2013). A framework for unifying spoken language, signed language, and gesture. Todas as Letras – Revista de Lingua e Literatura, 15.1 , 88–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, S., & Occhino, C. (2016). Constructing signs: Place as a symbolic structure in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics, 27 (3), 371–404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woll, B., Allsop, L., & Sutton-Spence, R. (1991). Variation and recent change in British Sign Language: Final report to the ESRC. University of Bristol.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woll, B., Sutton-Spence, R., & Elton, F. (2001). Multilingualism: The global approach to sign languages. In C. Lucas (Ed.), The sociolinguistics of sign languages (pp. 8–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woll, B. & Ladd, P. (2003). Deaf communities. In M. Marschark e P. E. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 151–163). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zinna, S. (2010). Dar voce alla cultura sorda. Il teatro come strumento di comunicazione e partecipazione culturale. Guidonia (Roma): Aletti Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zuccalà, A. (Ed.) (1996). Cultura del gesto e cultura della parola. Viaggio antropologico nel mondo dei sordi. Roma: Meltemi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zucchi, S. (2009). Along the time line. Tense and time adverbs in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language Semantics. 17 (2), 99–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zucchi, A., Neidle, C., Geraci, C., Duffy, Q., & Cecchetto, C. (2010). Functional markers in sign languages: the case of FATTO and FINISH. In D. Brentari (Ed.), Sign Languages (pp. 1997–224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue