Cover not available

In:Why Gesture?: How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating
Edited by Ruth Breckinridge Church, Martha W. Alibali and Spencer D. Kelly
[Gesture Studies 7] 2017
► pp. 15–37

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 2
Representational gestures help speakers package information for speaking

Published online: 26 April 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.7.02ali
Abstract
The Information Packaging Hypothesis (IPH; Kita, 2000) holds that gesture helps speakers package information into units appropriate for verbalization. When information packaging is more difficult, speakers produce more gestures. Further, manipulations of gesture can affect information packaging. The IPH can also account for gestures that are not redundant with speech; such gestures manifest speakers’ exploration of possibilities for verbalization, and they may indicate unsuccessful or incomplete packaging of perceptual or motoric information in speech. Qualitative analyses of the microgenesis of utterances illustrate how gesture plays a role in conceptualization and packaging of information. The IPH is supported by a large body of evidence and it aligns with contemporary theoretical accounts of the cognitive processes that give rise to gestures.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • The Information Packaging Hypothesis
  • Evidence for the Information Packaging Hypothesis
    • Conceptualization difficulty influences gesture production
    • Prohibiting gesture influences information packaging
    • Imposed gestures influence speech production
  • The Information Packaging Hypothesis and non-redundant gestures
  • How does gesture explore conceptualization possibilities for speaking?
  • The Information Packaging Hypothesis and the source of gesture
  • Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (46)
References
Alibali, Martha W. 2005. “Gesture in spatial cognition: Expressing, communicating, and thinking about spatial information.” Spatial Cognition and Computation 5: 307–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alibali, Martha W., Church, Ruth Breckinridge, Kita, Sotaro, & Hostetter, Autumn B. 2014. “Embodied knowledge in the development of conservation of quantity: Evidence from gesture.” In Emerging Perspectives on Gesture and Embodiment in Mathematics, Laurie D. Edwards, Francesca Ferrara, & Deborah Moore-Russo (eds), 27–49. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alibali, Martha. W., Evans, Julia L., Hostetter, Autumn B., Ryan, Kristin, & Mainela-Arnold, Elina 2009. “Gesture – speech integration in narrative: Are children less redundant than adults?” Gesture 9(3): 290–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alibali, Martha W., Kita, Sotaro, & Young, Amanda 2000. “Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture.” Language and Cognitive Processes 15: 593–613. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alibali, Martha W., Spencer, Robert C., Knox, Lucy, & Kita, Sotaro 2011. “Spontaneous gestures influence strategy choices in problem solving.” Psychological Science 22(9): 1138–1144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bavelas, Janet B., Chovil, Nicole, Lawrie, Douglas A., & Wade, Allan 1992. “Interactive gestures.” Discourse Processes 15: 469–489. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beilock, Sian L., & Goldin-Meadow, Susan 2010. “Gesture changes thought by grounding it in action.” Psychological Science 21(11): 1605–1610. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broaders, Sara C., Cook, Susan W., Mitchell, Zachary & Goldin-Meadow, Susan 2007. “Making children gesture brings out implicit knowledge and leads to learning.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136(4): 539–550. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butterworth, Brian & Hadar, Uri 1989. “Gesture, speech, and computational stages: A reply to McNeill.” Psychological Review 96: 168–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chu, Mingyuan & Kita, Sotaro 2016. “Co-thought and co-speech gestures are generated by the same action generation process.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 42(2): 257–270.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chu, Mingyuan, Meyer, Antje, Foulkes, Lucy, & Kita, Sotaro 2014. “Individual differences in frequency and saliency of speech-accompanying gestures: The role of cognitive abilities and empathy.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143(2): 694–709. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Church, Ruth Breckinridge & Goldin-Meadow, Susan 1986. “The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge.” Cognition 23: 43–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Ruiter, Jan-Peter 2006. “Can gesticulation help aphasic people speak, or rather, communicate?” International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 8(2): 124–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998, January 13. “Gesture and speech production.” Doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feyereisen, Pierre, & Havard, Isabelle 1999. “Mental imagery and production of hand gestures while speaking in younger and older adults.” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 23: 153–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Cook, Susan W. & Mitchell, Zachary A. 2009. “Gesturing gives children new ideas about math.” Psychological Science 20(3): 267–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoetjes, Marieke, Krahmer, Emiel, & Swerts, Marc 2013. “Does our speech change when we cannot gesture?” Speech Communication 57: 257–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hostetter, Autumn B. 2011. “When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 137(2): 297–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. “Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15(3): 495–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. “Language, gesture, action! A test of the Gesture as Simulated Action framework.” Journal of Memory and Language 63: 245–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hostetter, Autumn B., Alibali, Martha W., & Kita, Sotaro 2007a. “Does sitting on your hands make you bite your tongue? The effects of gesture prohibition on speech during motor descriptions.” In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Danielle S. McNamara & J. Gregory Trafton (eds), 1097–1102. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007b. “I see it in my hands’ eye: Representational gestures reflect conceptual demands.” Language and Cognitive Processes 22: 313–336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam 1994. “Do gestures communicate? A review.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 27: 175–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, Sotaro 2000. “How representational gestures help speaking.” In Language and Gesture, David McNeill (ed) 162–185. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. “Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review.” Language and Cognitive Processes 24(2): 145–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. “Production of speech-accompanying gesture.” In Oxford Handbook of Language Production, Matthew Goldrick, Victor Ferreira, & Michele Miozzo (eds). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, Sotaro, & Davies, Thomas S. 2009. “Competing conceptual representations trigger co-speech representational gestures.” Language and Cognitive Processes 24: 761–775. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, Sotaro, & Özyürek, Asli 2003. “What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking.” Journal of Memory and Language 48: 16–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopp, Stefan, Bergmann, Kirsten, & Kahl, Sebastian 2013. “A spreading-activation model of the semantic coordination of speech and gesture.” In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (eds), 823–828. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krauss, Robert M., Chen, Yihsiu, & Gottesman, Rebecca F. 2000. “Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process model.” In Language and Gesture, D. McNeill (ed), 261–283. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, David 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. Gesture and Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, David, & Duncan, Susan 2000. “Growth points in thinking-for-speaking.” In Language and Gesture, David McNeill (ed), 141–161. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melinger, Alissa, & Kita, Sotaro 2007. “Conceptualisation load triggers gesture production.” Language and Cognitive Processes 22(4): 473–500. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mol, L., & Kita, S. 2012. “Gesture structure affects syntactic structure in speech.” In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, N. Miyake, D. Peebles & R. P. Cooper (eds.), 761–766. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Özyürek, Asli, Kita, Sotaro, Allen, Shanley, Brown, Amanda, Furman, Reyhan, & Ishizuka, Tomoko 2008. “Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: Motion events in English and Turkish.” Developmental Psychology 44(4): 1040–1054. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Özyürek, Asli, Kita, Sotaro, Allen, Shanley, Furman, Reyhan, & Brown, Amanda 2005. “How does linguistic framing of events influence co-speech gestures?” Gesture 5(1/2): 219–240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rauscher, Frances H., Krauss, Robert M., & Chen, Yihsiu 1996. “Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production.” Psychological Science 7: 226–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, Susan M., Nusbaum, Howard, & Goldin-Meadow, Susan 2004. “Probing the mental representation of gesture: Is handwaving spatial?” Journal of Memory and Language 50: 395–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wesp, Richard, Hesse, Jennifer, Keutmann, Donna, & Wheaton, Karen 2001. “Gestures maintain spatial imagery.” The American Journal of Psychology 114: 591–600. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolff, Peter, & Gutstein, Joyce 1972. “Effects of induced motor gestures on vocal output.” The Journal of Communication 22: 277–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Church, R. Breckinridge, Michelle Perry, Melissa A. Singer, Susan Wagner Cook & Martha Wagner Alibali
2025. Teachers’ Gestures and How They Matter. Topics in Cognitive Science 17:3 ► pp. 545 ff. DOI logo
Alibali, Martha W. & Autumn B. Hostetter
2024. Gestures in Cognition: Actions that Bridge the Mind and the World. In The Cambridge Handbook of Gesture Studies, ► pp. 501 ff. DOI logo
Gullberg, Marianne
2024. Gesture and Second/Foreign Language Acquisition. In The Cambridge Handbook of Gesture Studies, ► pp. 398 ff. DOI logo
Mathayas, Nitasha, David E. Brown & Robb Lindgren
2021. “I got to see, and I got to be a part of it”: How cued gesturing facilitates middle‐school students' explanatory modeling of thermal conduction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 58:10 ► pp. 1557 ff. DOI logo
Minafra, Annamaria
2021. Exploring Gestures and Body Language in Professional Musicians During the Self-reflection Process on Technical Movement. In Language, Music and Gesture: Informational Crossroads, ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Hostetter, Autumn B. & Martha W. Alibali
2019. Gesture as simulated action: Revisiting the framework. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 26:3 ► pp. 721 ff. DOI logo
Mathayas, Nitasha, David E. Brown, Robert C. Wallon & Robb Lindgren
2019. Representational gesturing as an epistemic tool for the development of mechanistic explanatory models. Science Education 103:4 ► pp. 1047 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue