In:Integrating Gestures: The interdisciplinary nature of gesture
Edited by Gale Stam and Mika Ishino
[Gesture Studies 4] 2011
► pp. 15–26
Get fulltext
Chapter 2. Addressing the problems of intentionality and granularity in non-human primate gesture
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 30 June 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.4.03car
https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.4.03car
Any study of communicative gesture must identify which movements are purposeful (intentionality) and which examples of movements should be grouped into a single gesture (granularity). Where researchers studying human gesture are aided by linguistic context, researchers studying non-human primates must rely on their subjects’ movements alone to address these questions. We propose an approach to intentionality and granularity in non-human primate gesture based first on the possibility that only some, but not all individuals that use particular movements do so as intentional gestures, and second on the premise that gestures found to have specific meanings reflect real-world distinctions made by the animals. We apply this approach to the behavior of 28 captive orangutans and identify 64 distinct gestures, 29 of which have specific, predictable meanings.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Cartmill, Erica A., Emilie Genty, Kirsty E. Graham, Charlotte Grund & Catherine Hobaiter
Bourjade, Marie, Hélène Cochet, Sandra Molesti & Michèle Guidetti
Molesti, Sandra, Adrien Meguerditchian & Marie Bourjade
Byrne, R. W., E. Cartmill, E. Genty, K. E. Graham, C. Hobaiter & J. Tanner
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
