In:Metaphor and Gesture
Edited by Alan Cienki and Cornelia Müller
[Gesture Studies 3] 2008
► pp. 219–245
What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor
Published online: 4 June 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3.12mul
https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3.12mul
Studying gestures in language use offers the opportunity to uncover fundamental properties of metaphor which so far have received little interest – if at all. This is a shift towards studying metaphor as it is used, and it has important theoretical consequences because it reveals that metaphoricity is dynamic; it indicates that the speaker establishes or creates metaphoricity online through a general cognitive process, which is in principle modality independent. These facets of metaphor were uncovered through linguistic microanalyses of multi-modal segments of talk or discourse. Online cognitive processes (and their interactive logic) were reconstructed, drawing upon linguistic methods, gesture studies, and interaction analysis. Co-participants in an interaction have multiple (multi-modal) types of resources at their disposal to construct meaningful utterances and to create mutual understanding. These different methods address different aspects of this process of establishing, elaborating and creating metaphoric meaning. After a brief introductory discussion of some of the established characteristics of metaphor, this chapter presents micro-analyses of three verbogestural utterances which show that metaphors are modality independent products of a general cognitive process, and that they are dynamic in several respects: metaphoricity is not restricted to single clearly bounded entities – be they linguistic expressions, gestures or concepts. In contrast, metaphoricity may be active and maintained over stretches of discourse and it may be subject to successive foregrounding over units of talk and discourse. It will be concluded that activation of metaphoricity critically depends upon the dynamic flow of the speaker’s focal attention.
Cited by (47)
Cited by 47 other publications
Avelar, Maíra, Adriana Fernandes Barbosa & Beatriz Graça
Mouratidou, Alexandra & Mats Andrén
Schröder, Ulrike, Anna Ladilova & Thiago da Cunha Nascimento
2025. Metaphorical and metonymic constructions in co-speech gestures about the COVID-19 pandemic. In COVID-19 [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 11], ► pp. 272 ff.
Kraśnicka, Izabela
Schumann, Chiara
Morgenstern, Aliyah
Cienki, Alan & Michael O’Connor
2022. Researching embodied metaphor production through improvisational dance practice. In Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 9], ► pp. 63 ff.
Hampe, Beate
2022. Between embodiment and usage. In Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 9], ► pp. 157 ff.
Müller, Cornelia & Benjamin Marienfeld
2022. Feeling for speaking. In Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 9], ► pp. 77 ff.
Parrill, Fey, Jennifer Hinnell, Grace Moran, Hannah Boylan, Ishita Gupta & Aisha Zamir
Schröder, Ulrike & Jürgen Streeck
Sossin, K. Mark
Clarke, Jean S., Nicholas Llewellyn, Joep Cornelissen & Rowena Viney
Di Biase-Dyson, Camilla
2020. A typological framework of attention-drawing strategies for Ancient Egyptian
metaphorical language. In Drawing attention to metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5], ► pp. 39 ff.
Di Biase-Dyson, Camilla & Markus Egg
2020. Drawing attention to metaphor. In Drawing attention to metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5], ► pp. 1 ff.
Gong, Shu-Ping
2020. The acquisition of conceptual metaphors in Mandarin Chinese. Chinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究—美國中文教師學會學報). The journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, USA 55:1 ► pp. 24 ff.
Masi, Silvia
Costa, Josiane Marques da & Thiago da Cunha Nascimento
Müller, Cornelia
Müller, Cornelia
Stampoulidis, Georgios, Marianna Bolognesi & Jordan Zlatev
Bietti, Lucas M. & Michael J. Baker
2018. Collaborative remembering at work. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 19:3 ► pp. 459 ff.
Hassemer, Julius & Leland McCleary
Mittelberg, Irene
Zibin, Aseel
2018. The effect of the Arab Spring on the use of metaphor and metonymy in Jordanian economic discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:1 ► pp. 254 ff.
Zibin, Aseel
2020. A corpus-based study of metaphors used to describe Syrian refugees in Jordanian politico-economic discourse. Pragmatics and Society 11:4 ► pp. 640 ff.
Parrill, Fey & Kashmiri Stec
Schröder, Ulrike
2017. Chapter 8. The interactive (self-)reflexive construction of culture-related key words. In Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 274], ► pp. 181 ff.
Schröder, Ulrike
Harrison, Simon & Pierre Larrivée
Cienki, Alan
Cienki, Alan
2020. A multimodal perspective on MCA. In Drawing attention to metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5], ► pp. 63 ff.
Cienki, Alan
Cienki, Alan
Cienki, Alan
2022. Creative to whom, and on what basis?. In Time Representations in the Perspective of Human Creativity [Human Cognitive Processing, 75], ► pp. 233 ff.
Müller, Cornelia & Christina Schmitt
Simones, Lilian Lima, Matthew Rodger & Franziska Schroeder
Cienki, Alan, Lucas M Bietti & Kasper Kok
Matoesian, Gregory
Chui, Kawai
2018. Spatial conceptualization of sequence time in language and gesture. Gesture 17:1 ► pp. 176 ff.
Müller, Cornelia & Tag, Susanne
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
