Commentary published In: Gesture: Online-First Articles
Commentary
Multimodality’s role in nano-scale niche construction
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with The University of Sydney.
Published online: 10 December 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.25029.enf
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.25029.enf
Abstract
Human communicative discourse can be understood as a form of nano-scale niche construction. If our burst-like
communicative moves in the medium of language are to create niches that persist long enough to be exploited as shared
informational environments, then we need ways to bind individual moves into larger, temporarily stable structures. One important
resource for this purpose is multimodality, as found in pioneering work in gesture research by Adam Kendon and by David McNeill,
among others. The discussion points to areas where gesture studies and evolutionary approaches to human communication have
potential for collaboration and innovation.
Keywords: multimodality, niche-construction, evolution, temporality, catchments, binding
References (43)
Aureli, F., Schaffner, C. M., Boesch, C., Bearder, S. K., Call, J., Chapman, C. A., Connor, R., Di Fiore, A., Dunbar, R. I. M., Henzi, S. P., Holekamp, K., Korstjens, A. H., Layton, R., Lee, P., Lehmann, J., Manson, J. H., Ramos-Fernandez, G., Strier, K. B., and van Schaik, C. P. (2008). Fission-fusion
dynamics. Current
Anthropology 49(4): 627–54.
Bickerton, D. (2009). Adam’s
tongue: How humans made language, how language made humans. 1st
edn. Hill and Wang.
Clark, A. (2005). Word,
niche and super-niche: How language makes minds matter
more. THEORIA 20(3), 255–68.
Deacon, T. W. (1997). The
symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. W. W. Norton.
Dingemanse, M., Rossi, G., & Floyd, S. (2017). Place
reference in story beginnings: A cross-linguistic study of narrative and interactional
affordances.” Language in
Society 46(2), 129–58.
Donovan, A. M., Brown, S. A., & Alibali, M. W. (2023). Weakest
link or strongest link?: The effects of different types of linking gestures on
learning.” Gesture 22(1), 1–38.
Dor, D. (2015). The
instruction of imagination: Language as a social communication technology. Oxford University Press.
Enfield, N. J. (2009). The
anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge University Press.
Goffman, E. (1963). Behaviour
in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. The Free Press.
Goodwin, C. (1981). Interactional
organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. Academic Press.
Heyes, C. M. (2018). Cognitive
gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Harvard University Press.
Kendon, A. (1972). Some
relationships between body motion and speech: An analysis of an
example.” In Siegman, A. W., & Pope, B. (Eds.), Studies
in dyadic
communication, pp. 177–210. Pergamon Press.
(1978). Differential
perception and attentional frame in face-to-face interaction: Two problems for
investigation.” Semiotica 24(3/4), 305–15.
(1990). Conducting
interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge University Press.
Lala, K. N., Andrews, D., Uller, T., Feiner, N., Feldman, M. W., & Gilbert, S. F. (2024). Evolution
evolving: The developmental origins of adaptation and biodiversity. Princeton University Press.
Laland, K. N., Uller, T., Feldman, M. W., Sterelny, K., Müller, G. B., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E., & Odling-Smee, J. (2015). The
extended evolutionary synthesis: Its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proceedings of the
Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences 282(1813): 20151019.
Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., & Feldman, M. W. (2000). Niche
construction, biological evolution, and cultural change.” Behavioral and Brain
Sciences 23(1), 131–75.
Lewin, K. (1926). Vorsatz
Wille und Bedürfnis: Mit Vorbemerkungen über die psychischen Krāfte und Energien und die Struktur der
Seele. Springer.
Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar,
gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge University Press.
Manrique, E. (2016). Other-initiated
repair in Argentine Sign Language. Open
Linguistics 2(1), pp. 1–34.
Manrique, E., & Enfield, N. J. (2015). Suspending
the next turn as a form of repair initiation: Evidence from Argentine Sign Language. Frontiers
in
Psychology 61, 1–21.
McNeill, D., Quek, F., McCullough, K. -E., Duncan, S. D., Furuyama, R. B., & Ansari, R. (2001). Catchments,
prosody and
discourse. Gesture 1(1), 9–33.
Odling-Smee, J. C. (2024). Niche
construction: How life contributes to its own evolution. The MIT Press.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. C. (2021). Understanding
dialogue: Language use and social interaction. Cambridge University Press.
Pinker, S. (2010). The
cognitive niche: Coevolution of intelligence, sociality, and language. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 107(supplement_2): 8993–99.
Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (2002). Home
position. Gesture 2(2), 133–46.
Sinha, C. (2015). Language
and other artifacts: Socio-cultural dynamics of niche construction. Frontiers in Psychology
6(October), 1–18.