Cover not available

Article In: Gesture: Online-First Articles

Co-speech gesture provides a window onto intraindividual conflict during embodied sensemaking

ORCiD logo with link | Case Western Reserve University
 | Case Western Reserve University
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Intraindividual conflict is a cognitive state that can precipitate conceptual change. Organizational behavior has been a recent home for research on intraindividual conflict, but gesture-based data remain relatively uncommon in this literature compared with self-report and verbal measures. We argue that co-speech gesture can reveal the mental models that structure sense-making during intraindividual conflict. To demonstrate this, we present a detailed analysis of one individual’s narrated account of an intraindividual conflict arising at the intersection of her personal and workplace identities. By analyzing how the speaker systematically gestures across distinct regions of space, we suggest that a sequence of embodied mental models unfolds over the course of her narration. These mental models are implicitly visible in gesture before they emerge in speech. Gesture analysis suggests that the narrator’s sensemaking shifts toward a model that yields concrete, actionable options for how she can respond in the workplace. Our study shows that integrating gesture analysis into research on intraindividual conflict clarifies how people work through tension in real time and offers a productive avenue for advancing organizational behavior theory.
Article outline
  • Theoretical background
  • Method
    • Positionality
    • Data
    • Thematic analysis of speech
    • Gesture analysis
      • Overview
      • Gesture conventions
      • Initial structuring of gesture space
      • Gesture reveals an implicit mental model
      • Summary of the analysis
  • Discussion
    • Implications
    • Limitations
    • Future directions
  • Conclusion
  • Note
  • Author queries
  • References
References (100)
References
Alibali, M. W., Flevares, L. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1997). Assessing knowledge conveyed in gesture: Do teachers have the upper hand? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(15), 183–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alibali, M. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993). Gesture-speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: What the hands reveal about a child’s state of mind. Cognitive Psychology, 2551, 468–523. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alibali, M. W., & Hostetter, A. B. (2010). Mimicry and simulation in gesture comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 331, 433–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Archibold, E. E. (2022). The Role of Disruptions and Disruptor Identity in Generative Conflict: Setting the Conditions for Conflict Reflexivity in Teams During the Covid-19 Pandemic (Doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University).
Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, J. (1986). I show how you feel: Motor mimicry as a communicative act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 501, 322–329. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1987). Motor mimicry as primitive empathy. In Empathy and its development (pp. 317–338). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beattie, G., Webster, K., & Ross, J. (2010). The fixation and processing of the iconic gestures that accompany talk. Journal of language and social psychology, 29(2), 194–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beilock, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesture changes thought by grounding it in action. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1605–1610. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broaders, S. C., Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007). Making children gesture brings out implicit knowledge and leads to learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 539–550. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burtscher, M. J., Kolbe, M., Wacker, J., & Manser, T. (2011). Interactions of team mental models and monitoring behaviors predict team performance in simulated anesthesia inductions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(3), 257–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carr, E. W., Kever, A., & Winkielman, P. (2018). Embodiment of emotion and its situated nature. In A. Newen, L. de Bruin, & G. Shaun (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognition: Embodied, Embedded, Enactive, and Extended (pp. 528–552). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2008). Similarity and proximity: When does close in space mean close in mind? Memory & Cognition, 36(6), 1047–1056. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 351–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casasanto, D., & Jasmin, K. (2010). Good and bad in the hands of politicians: Spontaneous gestures during positive and negative speech. PLoS ONE, 5(7), e11805. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chartrand, T. L., Cheng, C. M., & Jefferis, V. E. (2002). You’re just a chameleon: The automatic nature and social significance of mimicry. In M. Jarymowicz & R. K. Ohme (Eds.). In Natura automatyzmow (Nature of automaticity) (pp. 19–24). IPPAN & SWPS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chui, K. (2011). Conceptual metaphors in gesture. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(3), 437–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Entity metaphor, object gesture, and context of use. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(1), 30–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chu, M., & Kita, S. (2011). The nature of gestures’ beneficial role in spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 102–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (1998). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In J.-P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 189–204). CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). The study of gesture in cognitive linguistics: How it could inform and inspire other research in cognitive science. WIREs Cognitive Science, 13(6). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (Eds.). (2008). Metaphor and Gesture. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clarke, J. S., Llewellyn, N., Cornelissen, J., & Viney, R. (2021). Gesture analysis and organizational research: The development and application of a protocol for naturalistic settings. Organizational Research Methods, 24(1), 140–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, S. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2006). The role of gesture in learning: Do children use their hands to change their minds? Journal of Cognition and Development, 7(2), 211–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cunliffe, A., & Coupland, C. (2012). From hero to villain to hero: Making experience sensible through embodied narrative sensemaking. Human Relations, 65(1), 63–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dargue, N., & Sweller, N. (2018). Not all gestures are created equal: The effects of typical and atypical iconic gestures on narrative comprehension. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 421, 327–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dargue, N., Sweller, N., & Jones, M. P. (2019). When our hands help us understand: A meta-analysis into the effects of gesture on comprehension. Psychological Bulletin, 145(8), 765–784. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, J. I., Benforado, A., Esrock, E., Turner, A., Dalton, R. C., van Noorden, L., & Leman, M. (2012). Four applications of embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science 41, 786–793. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). Measuring shared team mental models: A meta-analysis. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 141, 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkstra, K., Eerland, A., Zijlmans, J., & Post, L. S. (2012). How body balance influences political party evaluations: a Wii balance board study. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(536), 1–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1972). Hand movements. The Journal of Communication, 221, 353–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frederiksen, A. T. (2017). Separating viewpoint from mode of representation in iconic co-speech gestures: Insights from Danish narratives. Language and Cognition, 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedman, R. A., Tidd, S. T., Currall, S. C., & Tsai, J. C. (2000). What goes around comes around: The impact of personal conflict style on work conflict and stress. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11(1), 32–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: how our hands help us think. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). How our hands help us learn. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(5), 234–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Alibali, M. W. (1995). Mechanisms of transition: Learning with a helping hand. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 115–157), Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., Alibali, M. W., & Church, R. B. (1993). Transitions in concept acquisition: Using the hand to read the mind. Psychological Review, 100(25), 279–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gu, Y., Mol, L., Hoetjes, M., & Swerts, M. (2017). Conceptual and lexical effects on gestures: The case of vertical spatial metaphors for time in Chinese. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(8), 1048–1063. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gullberg, M., & Kita, S. (2009). Attention to speech-accompanying gestures: Eye movements and information uptake. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 331, 251–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holler, J., & Wilkin, K. (2011). Co-speech gesture mimicry in the process of collaborative referring during face-to-face dialogue. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, Advance online pub. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 495–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hruschka, D. J., Medin, D. L., Rogoff, B., & Henrich, J. (2018). Pressing questions in the study of psychological and behavioral diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1151, 1091–6490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, N. A., Ross, H., Lynam, T., Perez, P., & Leitch, A. (2011). Mental models: An interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society, 16(1), 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kimbara, I. (2006). On gestural mimicry. Gesture, 6(15), 39–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakin, J., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 1451, 334–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakin, J., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 2751, 145–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2008). The neuroscience of metaphoric gestures: Why they exist. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 283–289). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Explaining embodied cognition results. Topics in Cognitive Science, 41, 773–785. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lampert, M., & Edwards, J. (1993). Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lausberg, H., & Sloetjes, H. (2009). Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES--ELAN system. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 841–849. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). The revised NEUROGES-ELAN system: An objective and reliable interdisciplinary analysis tool for nonverbal behavior and gesture. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 973–993. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. B., Schlindwein, E., Jalan, R., & Heaphy, E. D. (2023). Organizational body work: Efforts to shape human bodies in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 17(1), 37–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Guen, O., & Pool Balam, L. I. (2012). No metaphorical timeline in gesture and cognition among Yucatec Mayas. Frontiers in Psychology, 31, 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leitan, N. D., & Chaffey, L. (2014). Embodied cognition and its applications: A brief review. Sensoria: A Journal of Mind, Brain & Culture, 10(1), 3–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Louwerse, M., & Bangerter, A. (2010). Effects of ambiguous gestures and language on the time course of reference resolution. Cognitive Science, 341, 1517–1529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Catchments and contexts: Non-modular factors in speech and gesture production. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 321–328). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Gesture and thought. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nathan, M. J. (2021). Foundations of embodied learning: A paradigm for education. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 184–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M., Winkielman, P., Mondillon, L., & Vermeulen, N. (2009). Embodiment of emotion concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(6), 1120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuñez, R., & Sweetser, E. E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(5), 401–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nzinga, K., Rapp, D. N., Leatherwood, C., Easterday, M., Rogers, L. O., Gallagher, N., & Medin, D. L. (2018). Should social scientists be distanced from or engaged with the people they study? PNAS, 11435–11441. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, S., Luciano, M. M., Mathieu, J. E., & Fenters, V. W. (2024). Intra-individual conflict and task performance in a multiteam context: Examining the structural elements of conflict experience. Academy of Management Journal, 67(1), 33–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parrill, F. (2010). Viewpoint in speech-gesture integration: Linguistic structure, discourse structure, and event structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(5), 650–668. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parrill, F., & Kimbara, I. (2006). Seeing and hearing double: The influence of mimicry in speech and gesture on observers. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 301, 157–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perniss, P., & Özyürek, A. (2015). Visible cohesion: A comparison of reference tracking in sign, speech, and co-speech gesture. Topics in Cognitive Science, 71, 36–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ping, R., Church, R. B., Decatur, M.-A., Larson, S. W., Zinchenko, E., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2021). Unpacking the gestures of chemistry learners: What the hands tell us about correct and incorrect conceptions of stereochemistry. Discourse Processes, 58(3), 213–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prinz, J. J., & Barsalou, L. W. (2000). Steering a course for embodied representation. In Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual change in humans and machines. Dietrich, E., Markman, A. B. (Eds.). MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rahim, M. A. (2023). Managing conflict in organizations (5 ed.). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Essentials of organizational behavior. Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2020). Sensemaking reconsidered: Towards a broader understanding through phenomenology. Organization Theory, 1(1), 263178771987993. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sassenberg, K., & Winter, K. (2024). Intraindividual conflicts reduce the polarization of attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 33(3), 190–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shah, P. P., Peterson, R. S., Jones, S. L., & Ferguson, A. J. (2021). Things are not always what they seem: The origins and evolution of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(2), 426–474. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
So, W. C., Kita, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). Using the hands to identify who does what to whom: Gesture and speech go hand-in-hand. Cognitive Science, 331, 115–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svyantek, D. J., & Brown, L. L. (2000). A complex-systems approach to organizations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 91, 69–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1998). Regular metaphoricity in gesture: Bodily-based models of speech interaction. Actes du 16 Congres International des Linguistes 51. 1 — 17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Baaren, R. B., Holland, R. W., Steenaert, B., & van Knippenberg, A. (2003). Mimicry for money: Behavioral consequences of imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 391, 393–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vough, H. C., Cardador, M. T., Caza, B. B., & Campion, E. D. (2024). The identity conflict process: Appraisal theory as an integrative framework for understanding identity conflict at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 110(2), 149–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wakefield, E., Novack, M. A., Congdon, E. L., Franconeri, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2018). Gesture helps learners learn, but not merely by guiding their visual attention. Developmental Science, 21(12664), 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, E., & Cooperrider, K. (2016). The continuity of metaphor: Evidence from temporal gestures. Cognitive Science, 40(2), 481–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (2012). Organized sensemaking: A commentary on processes of interpretive work. Human Relations, 65(1), 141–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiesenfeld, B. M., Reyt, J. N., Brockner, J., & Trope, Y. (2017). Construal level theory in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 41, 367–400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, A. D., & Golonka, S. (2013). Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(58), 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, B., & Matlock, T. (2013). Making judgments based on similarity and proximity. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(4), 219–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, C. D. (2008). Embodied cognition: Grounded until further notice. British Journal of Psychology, 991, 157–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, Y. C., & Coulson, S. (2007). How iconic gestures enhance communication: An ERP study. Brain and Language, 1011, 234–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue