Article In: Gesture: Online-First Articles
Pinkie first
Digital list constructions in Brazilian Portuguese
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Spoken language lists can be accompanied by digital lists:
manual actions by means of which the fingers of the non-dominant hand are
associated with the spoken listed items. In this paper we offer an overview of
the formal aspects of digital list constructions and their contextual
motivations in Brazilian Portuguese. We also describe their discourse functions.
To achieve these goals, we analyzed 125 digital list constructions collected
from 77 online videos, using the work of Wilcox, S., Xavier, A. N., & Siltaloppi, S. (2023). List
constructions in two signed
languages. Language &
Cognition, 16(1), 57–92. as a framework. Our results show that digital
list constructions in Brazilian Portuguese typically begin at the pinkie finger.
Discursively, they show that such constructions are used to introduce and refer
back to referents, as well as to organize discourse. We conclude that digital
list constructions in Brazilian Portuguese share many similarities with list
constructions in signed languages, especially in Brazilian Sign Language
(Libras), but also exhibit striking differences.
Keywords: digital list, formal aspects, discourse functions, Brazilian Portuguese, Libras
Article outline
- Introduction
- Digital list constructions in signed languages
- List constructions in spoken languages
- Speech only
- Speech and other bodily actions
- Method
- Formal aspects of digital list constructions in Brazilian Portuguese and
contextual motivations for their use
- Digital list types
- List-hand perseveration
- Fingers and spoken listed items association
- Dominant hand actions
- Combination of digital list constructions with digital number constructions
- Discourse functions of digital list constructions in Brazilian Portuguese
- Discussion
- Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Author queries
References
References (38)
Bender, A., & Beller, S. (2012). Nature
and culture of finger counting: Diversity and representational effects of an
embodied cognitive
tool. Cognition, 124(2), 156–182.
Chafe, W. L. (1987). Cognitive
constraints on information
flow. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence
and grounding in
discourse, pp. 21–51. John Benjamins.
Cooperrider, K., & Mesh, K. (2022). Pointing
in gesture and
sign. In. Morgenstern, A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (Eds.), The
blossoming of gesture in
language (pp. 21–46). De Gruyter Mouton.
Emmorey, K. (2007). The
cognitive consequences of simultaneity in sign language
processing. In Vermeerbergen, M., Leeson, L., & Crasborn, O. (Eds.), Simultaneity
in Signed Languages: Form and
function, pp. 209–228. John Benjamins.
Erickson, F. (1993). They
know all the lines: Rhythmic organization and contextualization in a
conversational listing
routine. In Adamson, H. M. (Ed.), Language
and learning: The collected papers of Frederick
Erickson, pp. 165–188. University of Chicago Press.
Fenlon, J., Cooperrider, K., Keane, J., Brentari, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2019). Comparing
sign language and gesture: Insights from
pointing. Glossa: A Journal of General
Linguistics, 4(1), 1–26.
Gabardo, L., & Xavier, A. N. (2024). Troca
de dominância em diferentes situações comunicativas na
Libras. Cadernos de
Linguística, 5(2), e732.
Gabarró-López, S. (2019). Describing
buoys from the perspective of discourse markers: A cross-genre study of
French Belgian Sign Language (LSFB). Sign
Language, &
Linguistics, 22(2), 210–240.
Hansen, M., & Heßmann, J. (2015). Researching
linguistic features of text genres in a DGS corpus. The case of finger
loci. Sign Language, &
Linguistics, 18(1), 1–40.
Heitkoetter, R. P., & Xavier, A. N. (2022). Estudo
comparativo de boias de listagem em produções de dois sinalizantes surdos
paranaenses. Interletras, 11(36), 1–15.
(2024). Extension
and perseveration of list buoys in
Libras. Signum: Estudos da
Linguagem, 27(3), 9–31.
Hinnell, J., & Rice, S. (2020). “X,
Y, and whatever: The embodiment of list-extending expressions in
English”. Presentation at
the 14th High Desert Linguistics Society
(HDLS), Albuquerque, New
Mexico, 20–22 November
2020.
Inbar, A. (2020). List
completions in interaction: The case of “and so on and so
forth”. Discourse
Studies, 22(4), 438–462.
Jefferson, G. (1990). List-construction
as a task and a
resource. In Psathas, G. (Ed.), Interaction
Competence, pp. 63–92. University Press of America.
Kendon, A. (2011). Vocalisation,
speech, gesture and the language origins debate: An essay review on recent
contributions. Gesture, 11(3), 349–370.
Kendon, Adam. (2017). Languages
as semiotically heterogeneous
systems. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 401, 30–31.
Kusters, A., & Sahasrabudhe, S. (2018). Language
ideologies on the difference between gesture and
sign. Language &
Communication, 601, 44–63.
Leite, T. de A. (2008). A
segmentação da língua de sinais brasileira (libras): um estudo lingüístico
descritivo a partir da conversação espontânea entre
surdos [Doctoral
dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo].
Leite, T. de A., & McCleary, L. (2013). A
identificação de unidades gramaticais na Libras: Uma proposta de abordagem
baseada-no-uso. Todas as Letras: Revista de
Língua e
Literatura, 15(1), 62–97.
Liddell, S. K., Vogt-Svendsen, M., & Bergman, B. (2007). A
Crosslinguistic Comparison of
Buoys. In Vermeerbergen, M., Leeson, L., & Crasborn, O. (Eds.), Simultaneity
in Signed Languages. Form and
function, pp. 187–215. John Benjamins.
Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar,
gesture, and meaning in American Sign
Language. Cambridge University Press.
Masini, F., Mauri, C., & Pietrandrea, P. (2018). List
constructions: Towards a unified
account. Italian Journal of
Linguistics, 30(1), 49–94.
Pinsonneault, D., & Lelièvre, L. (1994). Enumeration
in LSQ (Québec Sign Language): The use of fingertip
loci. In Ahlgren, I., Bergman, B., & Brennan, M. (Eds.), Perspectives
on Sign Language structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on
Sign Language
Research (Vol. 11), pp. 159–172. International Sign Linguistics Association.
Rodrigues, I. G. (2015). A
tool at hand: gestures and rhythm in listing events: Case studies of
European and African Portuguese
speakers. OSLa: Oslo Studies in
Language, 7(1), 253–281.
Safar, J., Le Guen, O., Collí Collí, G., & Collí Hau, M. (2018). Numeral
variation in Yucatec Maya Sign
Languages. Sign Language
Studies, 18(4), 488–516.
Sánchez-Ayala, I. (2018). Constructions
as resources for interaction: Lists in English and Spanish
conversation. Journal of
Pragmatics, 1311, 1–16.
Schembri, A., Jones, C., & Burnham, D. (2005). Comparing
action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: Evidence from Australian
Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and Nonsigners’ gestures without
speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf
Education, 10(3), 272–290.
(2001). Discourse
markers: Language, meaning, and
context. In Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (Eds.), The
handbook of discourse
analysis, pp. 54–75. Blackwell Publishers.
Selting, M. (2007). Lists
as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an
interactional resource. Journal of
Pragmatics, 39(3), 483–526.
Siltaloppi, S. (2023). List
constructions in Finland-Swedish Sign Language
(FinSSL). [Doctoral
dissertation, University of Helsinki, Helsinki]. [URL] (last
access 17
March 2026)
Tao, H. (2019). List
gestures in Mandarin conversation and their implications for understanding
multimodal
interaction. In Li, X., & Ono, T. (Eds.), Multimodality
in Chinese Interaction (Applications of Cognitive
Linguistics), pp. 65–98. De Gruyter Mouton.
Wilcox, S., & Xavier, A. N. (2013). A
framework for unifying spoken language, signed language, and
gesture. Todas As Letras — Revista De Língua
E
Literatura, 15(1).
Wilcox, S., Xavier, A. N., & Siltaloppi, S. (2023). List
constructions in two signed
languages. Language &
Cognition, 16(1), 57–92.
Wilcox, S., Martínez, R., & Siyavoshi, S. (2025). Signed
Language and Cognitive Grammar. Cambridge University Press.