Cover not available

Review published In: Gesture
Vol. 22:3 (2023) ► pp.325336

References (53)
References
Arbib, M. (2012). How the brain got language: The mirror system hypothesis. Oxford Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blackwell, N. L., Perlman, M., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2015). Quotation as a multimodal construction. Journal of Pragmatics, 811, 1–7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Börstell, C., Lepic, R., & Belsitzman, G. (2016). Articulatory plurality is a property of lexical plurals in sign language. Lexical plurals and beyond. Special Issue of Lingvisticae Investigationes, 39(2), 391–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boulenger, V., Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Deprez, V., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T. a. (2006). Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 msec of processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(10), 1607–1615. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christensen, P., Fusaroli, R., & Tylén, K. (2016). Environmental constraints shaping constituent order in emerging communication systems: Structural iconicity, interactive alignment and conventionalization. Cognition, 1461, 67–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corballis, M. (2003). From hand to mouth: The gestural origins of language. In M. H. Christiansen & S. Kirby (Eds.), Language evolution (pp. 201–218). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Perlman, M., & Perniss, P. (2020). Construals of iconicity: Experimental approaches to form-meaning resemblances in language. Language and Cognition, 12(1), 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., McCullough, S., Mehta, S., Ponto, L. L. B., & Grabowski, T. J. (2011a). Sign language and pantomime production differentially engage frontal and parietal cortices. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(7), 878–901. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011b). Sign language and pantomime production differentially engage frontal and parietal cortices. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(7), 878–901. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrara, L., & Hodge, G. (2018). Language as description , indication , and depiction. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(May), 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuks, O. (2023). Infants’ use of iconicity in the early periods of sign/spoken word-learning. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 28(1), 21–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., So, W. C., Ozyürek, A., & Mylander, C. (2008a). The natural order of events: how speakers of different languages represent events nonverbally. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(27), 9163–9168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008b). The natural order of events: how speakers of different languages represent events nonverbally. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(27), 9163–9168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hagoort, P., & Özyürek, A. (2024). Extending the architecture of language from a multimodal perspective. Topics in Cognitive Science, 001, 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jantunen, T. (2017). Constructed action, the clause and the nature of syntax in Finnish Sign Language. Open Linguistics, 3(1), 65–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, S. D., Özyürek, A., & Maris, E. (2010). Two sides of the same coin: Speech and gesture mutually interact to enhance comprehension. Psychological Science, 21(2), 260–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 16–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marentette, P., Pettenati, P., Bello, A., & Volterra, V. (2016). Gesture and symbolic representation in Italian and English-speaking Canadian 2-year-olds. Child Development, 00(0), 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meir, I., Aronoff, M., Börstell, C., Hwang, S., Ilkbasaran, D., Kastner, I., Lepic, R., Ben-Basat, A. L., Padden, C. & Sandler, W. (2017). The origin of grammatical word order: insights from novel communication systems and young sign languages. Cognition, 1581, 189–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meissner, M., Philpott, S. B., & Philpott, D. (1975). The Sign Language of sawmill workers in British Columbia. Sign Language Studies, 9(1), 291–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Motamedi, Y., Schouwstra, M., Culbertson, J., Smith, K., & Kirby, S. (2018). Evolving artificial sign languages in the lab: From improvised gesture to systematic sign. Cognition, 1921, 2019.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2016). From mimesis to meaning: A systematics of gestural mimesis for concrete and abstract referential gestures. In J. Zlatev, G. Sonesson & P. Konderak (Eds.), Meaning, mind and communication: Explorations in cognitive semiotics, pp. 211–226. Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Gesture and sign: Cataclysmic break or dynamic relations? Frontiers in Psychology, 9(September), 1651. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024). Gestural mimesis as “as-if” action. In P. Zywiczynski, J. Blomberg, & M. Boruta-Zywiczynski (Eds.), Perspectives on Pantomime, pp. 217–241. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newport, E. L., & Supalla, T. (1978). How many seats in a chair? The derivations of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. In P. Siple (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, pp. 91–132. Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Reilly, A. W. (1995). Using representations: comprehension and production of actions with imagined objects. Child Development, 66(4), 999–1010. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, G., & Özyürek, A. (2019). Systematic mappings between semantic categories and types of iconic representations in the manual modality: A normed database of silent gesture. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, G., Schiefner, A., & Ozyürek, A. (2019). Hearing non-signers use their gestures to predict iconic form-meaning mappings at first exposure to signs. Cognition 1911, 103996. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, G., Sümer, B., & Ozyürek, A. (2017). Type of iconicity matters in the vocabulary development of signing children. Developmental Psychology, 53(1), 89–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Özçalişkan, Ş., Lucero, C., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2016). Does language shape silent gesture? Cognition, 1481, 10–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Özyürek, A. (2014). Hearing and seeing meaning in speech and gesture: Insights from brain and behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 20130296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padden, C., Hwang, S.-O., Lepic, R., & Seegers, S. (2015). Tools for language: Patterned iconicity in Sign Language nouns and verbs. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7(1), 81–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padden, C., Meir, I., Hwang, S.-O., Lepic, R., Seegers, S., & Sampson, T. (2013). Patterned iconicity in sign language lexicons. Gesture, 13(3), 287–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perniss, P., Thompson, R. L., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). Iconicity as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(227), 1664–1678. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perniss, P., & Vigliocco, G. (2014). The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369(20130300).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(2), 131–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, W. (2018). The body as evidence for the nature of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(Oct), 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, W., & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Sign Language and linguistic universals. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiefner, A., Ortega, G., & Perniss, P. (n.d.). Iconicity shapes lexical similarity: The case of British and German Sign Language. Submitted.
Stec, K., Huiskes, M., & Redeker, G. (2016). Multimodal quotation: Role shift practices in spoken narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 1041, 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanini, S., Bello, A., Caselli, M. C., Iverson, J. M., & Volterra, V. (2009). Co-speech gestures in a naming task: Developmental data. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 168–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanini, S., Caselli, M. C., & Volterra, V. (2007). Spoken and gestural production in a naming task by young children with Down syndrome. Brain and Language, 101(3), 208–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokoe, W. C. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. In Studies in linguistics: Occasional papers Vol. 8, University of Buffalo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Nispen, K., van de Sandt-Koenderman, M., Mol, L., & Krahmer, E. (2016). Pantomime production by people with aphasia: What are influencing factors? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 24(2), 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Nispen, K., van de Sandt-Koenderman, W. M. E., & Krahmer, E. (2017). Production and comprehension of pantomimes used to depict objects. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(July), 1095. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Perniss, P., & Vinson, D. (2014). Language as a multimodal phenomenon: implications for language learning, processing and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369(20130292). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volterra, V., Capirci, O., Caselli, M. C., Rinaldi, P., & Sparaci, L. (2017). Developmental evidence for continuity from action to gesture to sign/word. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 8(1), 13–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Żywiczyński, P., Blomberg, J., & Boruta-Żywiczyńska, M., Eds. (2024). Perspectives on pantomime. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue