Book review
. Perspectives on Pantomime. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.12
Reviewed by
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with University of Birmingham.
Published online: 15 November 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.24027.ort
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.24027.ort
References (53)
Bank, R. (2015). The
ubiquity of mouthings in NGT. A corpus
study. Utrecht: LOT.
Blackwell, N. L., Perlman, M., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2015). Quotation
as a multimodal construction. Journal of
Pragmatics, 811, 1–7.
Börstell, C., Lepic, R., & Belsitzman, G. (2016). Articulatory
plurality is a property of lexical plurals in sign language. Lexical plurals and
beyond. Special Issue of Lingvisticae
Investigationes, 39(2), 391–407.
Boulenger, V., Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Deprez, V., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T. a. (2006). Cross-talk
between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 msec of
processing. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 18(10), 1607–1615.
Christensen, P., Fusaroli, R., & Tylén, K. (2016). Environmental
constraints shaping constituent order in emerging communication systems: Structural iconicity, interactive alignment and
conventionalization. Cognition, 1461, 67–80.
Corballis, M. (2003). From
hand to mouth: The gestural origins of language. In M. H. Christiansen & S. Kirby (Eds.), Language
evolution (pp. 201–218). Oxford University Press.
Dingemanse, M., Perlman, M., & Perniss, P. (2020). Construals
of iconicity: Experimental approaches to form-meaning resemblances in language. Language and
Cognition, 12(1), 1–14.
Emmorey, K., McCullough, S., Mehta, S., Ponto, L. L. B., & Grabowski, T. J. (2011a). Sign
language and pantomime production differentially engage frontal and parietal cortices. Language
and Cognitive
Processes, 26(7), 878–901.
(2011b). Sign
language and pantomime production differentially engage frontal and parietal cortices. Language
and Cognitive
Processes, 26(7), 878–901.
Ferrara, L., & Hodge, G. (2018). Language
as description , indication , and depiction. Frontiers in
Psychology, 9(May), 1–15.
Fuks, O. (2023). Infants’
use of iconicity in the early periods of sign/spoken word-learning. Journal of Deaf Studies and
Deaf
Education, 28(1), 21–31.
Goldin-Meadow, S., So, W. C., Ozyürek, A., & Mylander, C. (2008a). The
natural order of events: how speakers of different languages represent events
nonverbally. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America, 105(27), 9163–9168.
(2008b). The
natural order of events: how speakers of different languages represent events
nonverbally. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America, 105(27), 9163–9168.
Hagoort, P., & Özyürek, A. (2024). Extending
the architecture of language from a multimodal perspective. Topics in Cognitive
Science, 001, 1–11.
Jantunen, T. (2017). Constructed
action, the clause and the nature of syntax in Finnish Sign Language. Open
Linguistics, 3(1), 65–85.
Kelly, S. D., Özyürek, A., & Maris, E. (2010). Two
sides of the same coin: Speech and gesture mutually interact to enhance
comprehension. Psychological
Science, 21(2), 260–267.
Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation
and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. De Gruyter Mouton.
Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What
does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface
representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and
Language, 48(1), 16–32.
Lewin, D., & Schembri, A. C. (2011). Mouth
gestures in British Sign Language: A case study of tongue protrusion in BSL narratives. Sign
Language &
Linguistics, 14(1), 94–114.
Marentette, P., Pettenati, P., Bello, A., & Volterra, V. (2016). Gesture
and symbolic representation in Italian and English-speaking Canadian 2-year-olds. Child
Development, 00(0), 1–18.
Meir, I., Aronoff, M., Börstell, C., Hwang, S., Ilkbasaran, D., Kastner, I., Lepic, R., Ben-Basat, A. L., Padden, C. & Sandler, W. (2017). The
origin of grammatical word order: insights from novel communication systems and young sign
languages. Cognition, 1581, 189–207.
Meissner, M., Philpott, S. B., & Philpott, D. (1975). The
Sign Language of sawmill workers in British Columbia. Sign Language
Studies, 9(1), 291–308.
Motamedi, Y., Schouwstra, M., Culbertson, J., Smith, K., & Kirby, S. (2018). Evolving
artificial sign languages in the lab: From improvised gesture to systematic
sign. Cognition, 1921, 2019.
Müller, C. (2016). From
mimesis to meaning: A systematics of gestural mimesis for concrete and abstract referential
gestures. In J. Zlatev, G. Sonesson & P. Konderak (Eds.), Meaning,
mind and communication: Explorations in cognitive
semiotics, pp. 211–226. Peter Lang.
(2018). Gesture
and sign: Cataclysmic break or dynamic relations? Frontiers in
Psychology, 9(September), 1651.
(2024). Gestural
mimesis as “as-if” action. In P. Zywiczynski, J. Blomberg, & M. Boruta-Zywiczynski (Eds.), Perspectives
on
Pantomime, pp. 217–241. John Benjamins.
Newport, E. L., & Supalla, T. (1978). How
many seats in a chair? The derivations of nouns and verbs in American Sign
Language. In P. Siple (Ed.), Understanding
language through sign language
research, pp. 91–132. Academic Press.
O’Reilly, A. W. (1995). Using
representations: comprehension and production of actions with imagined objects. Child
Development, 66(4), 999–1010.
Ortega, G., & Özyürek, A. (2019). Systematic
mappings between semantic categories and types of iconic representations in the manual modality: A normed database of silent
gesture. Behavior Research
Methods, 52(1).
Ortega, G., Schiefner, A., & Ozyürek, A. (2019). Hearing
non-signers use their gestures to predict iconic form-meaning mappings at first exposure to
signs. Cognition 1911, 103996.
Ortega, G., Sümer, B., & Ozyürek, A. (2017). Type
of iconicity matters in the vocabulary development of signing children. Developmental
Psychology, 53(1), 89–99.
Özçalişkan, Ş., Lucero, C., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2016). Does
language shape silent
gesture? Cognition, 1481, 10–18.
Özyürek, A. (2014). Hearing
and seeing meaning in speech and gesture: Insights from brain and behaviour. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences, 369(1651), 20130296.
Padden, C., Hwang, S.-O., Lepic, R., & Seegers, S. (2015). Tools
for language: Patterned iconicity in Sign Language nouns and verbs. Topics in Cognitive
Science, 7(1), 81–94.
Padden, C., Meir, I., Hwang, S.-O., Lepic, R., Seegers, S., & Sampson, T. (2013). Patterned
iconicity in sign language
lexicons. Gesture, 13(3), 287–305.
Perniss, P., Thompson, R. L., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). Iconicity
as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in
Psychology, 1(227), 1664–1678.
Perniss, P., & Vigliocco, G. (2014). The
bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological
Sciences, 369(20130300).
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor
cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain
Research, 3(2), 131–141.
Sandler, W. (2018). The
body as evidence for the nature of language. Frontiers in
Psychology, 9(Oct), 1–21.
Sandler, W., & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Sign
Language and linguistic universals. Cambridge University Press.
Schiefner, A., Ortega, G., & Perniss, P. (n.d.). Iconicity
shapes lexical similarity: The case of British and German Sign
Language. Submitted.
Stec, K., Huiskes, M., & Redeker, G. (2016). Multimodal
quotation: Role shift practices in spoken narratives. Journal of
Pragmatics, 1041, 1–17.
Stefanini, S., Bello, A., Caselli, M. C., Iverson, J. M., & Volterra, V. (2009). Co-speech
gestures in a naming task: Developmental data. Language and Cognitive
Processes, 24(2), 168–189.
Stefanini, S., Caselli, M. C., & Volterra, V. (2007). Spoken
and gestural production in a naming task by young children with Down syndrome. Brain and
Language, 101(3), 208–221.
Stokoe, W. C. (1960). Sign
language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American
deaf. In Studies in linguistics: Occasional papers Vol.
8, University of Buffalo.
van Nispen, K., van de Sandt-Koenderman, M., Mol, L., & Krahmer, E. (2016). Pantomime
production by people with aphasia: What are influencing factors? Journal of Speech, Language,
and Hearing
Research, 24(2), 1–14.
van Nispen, K., van de Sandt-Koenderman, W. M. E., & Krahmer, E. (2017). Production
and comprehension of pantomimes used to depict objects. Frontiers in
Psychology, 8(July), 1095.
Vigliocco, G., Perniss, P., & Vinson, D. (2014). Language
as a multimodal phenomenon: implications for language learning, processing and
evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological
Sciences, 369(20130292).
Volterra, V., Capirci, O., Caselli, M. C., Rinaldi, P., & Sparaci, L. (2017). Developmental
evidence for continuity from action to gesture to sign/word. Language, Interaction and
Acquisition, 8(1), 13–41.
Żywiczyński, P., Blomberg, J., & Boruta-Żywiczyńska, M., Eds. (2024). Perspectives
on pantomime. John Benjamins.
