Cover not available

Article published In: Gesture
Vol. 21:1 (2022) ► pp.82–114

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Managing co-presence with a wave of the hand

Waving as an interactional resource in openings and closings of video-mediated breaks from work

ORCiD logo with link | University of Oulu
ORCiD logo with link | University of Oulu
ORCiD logo with link | University of Oulu
ORCiD logo with link | University of Oulu
ORCiD logo with link | University of Oulu
Published online: 29 June 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.21015.sii
Abstract
The article examines naturally-occuring video-mediated breaks from work as social activity and focuses on the use of waving gestures in their openings and closings. Drawing on multimodal conversation analysis as a research method and recorded virtual breaks of two work communities in Finland as data, the study shows that, contrary to openings and closings in a physical breakroom at the workplace, waving ‘hello’ or ‘goodbye’ is a prevalent practice in video-mediated break openings and closings. By waving their hand(s), which is typically accompanied by a verbal greeting or farewell, participants make their own arrival or departure, or their orientation to the arrival or departure of someone else, visible and explicit. Thus, waving facilitates the management of co-presence in technology-mediated encounters. Further, by waving in conjunction with other upgraded features of openings and closings, participants engage in important relationship maintenance work during their encounter.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Interactional resources for openings and closings
  • Data and method
  • Analysis and findings
    • Waving hello
      • Waving when Opening an Encounter
      • Waving when Joining an Ongoing Encounter
    • Waving goodbye
      • Waving when Leaving an Encounter
      • Waving when closing an encounter
  • Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (62)
References
Antaki, C. (2002). “Lovely”: Turn-initial high-grade assessments in telephone closings. Discourse Studies, 4(1), 5–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arminen, I., Licoppe, C., & Spagnolli, A. (2016). Respecifying mediated interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(4), 290–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, P. (1990). Rhythm in telephone closings. Human Studies, 13(4), 361–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beach, W. (1995). Conversation analysis: “Okay” as a clue for understanding consequentiality. In S. J. Sigman (Ed.), The consequentiality of communication (pp. 121–162). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broth, M., & Mondada, L. (2013). Walking away: The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 471, 41–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Button, G. (1987). Moving out of closings. In G. Button (Ed.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 101–151). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1996). The prosody of repetition: On quoting and mimicry. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (pp. 366–405). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Stefani, E., & Mondada, L. (2018). Encounters in public space: How acquainted versus unacquainted persons establish social and spatial arrangements. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(3), 248–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Due, B. L., & Licoppe, C. (2021). Video-mediated interaction (VMI): Introduction to a special issue on the multimodal accomplishment of VMI institutional activities. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 3(3). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fatigante, M., Liberati, V., & Pontecorvo, C. (2010). Transitions in and out of games: How parents and children bracket game episodes at home. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(4), 346–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fayard, A. L. (2006). Interacting on a video-mediated stage: The collaborative construction of a video-mediated setting. Information Technology & People, 19(2), 152–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firth, R. (1972). Verbal and bodily rituals of greeting and parting. In J. S. La Fontaine (Ed.), The interpretation of ritual. Essays in honour of A. I. Richards (pp. 1–38). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, C. E., & Fox, B. A. (2010). Multiple practices for constructing laughables. In D. Barth-Weingarten, E. Reber, & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in interaction (pp. 339–368). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. (2017). Haptic sociality: The embodied interactive constitution of intimacy through touch. In C. Mayer, J. Streeck, & J. S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction (pp. 73–102). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harper, R., Watson, R., & Licoppe, C. (2017). Interpersonal video communication as a site of human sociality. Pragmatics, 27(3), 301–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harren, I., & Raitaniemi, M. (2008). The sequential structure of closings in private German phone calls. Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 91, 198–223. [URL]
Heath, C. (1981). The opening sequence in doctor-patient interaction. In P. Atkinson, & C. Heath (Eds), Medical work: Realities and routines (pp. 71–90). Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1985). The consultation’s end: the coordination of speech and body movement. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 511, 27–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1993). Disembodied conduct: Interactional asymmetries in video-mediated communication. In G. Button (Ed.), Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction and technology (pp. 35–54). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helisten, M. (2017). Resumptions as multimodal achievements in conversational (story)tellings. Journal of Pragmatics, 1121, 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helisten, M., & Siromaa, M. (2022). ‘Right, already brewing there’: Arriving to the staff breakroom and beginning interaction with a co-present colleague. Journal of Pragmatics, 1931, 139–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, E. M. (2017). Sequence recompletion: A practice for managing lapses in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 1091, 47–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilomäki, S., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2020). From appearings to disengagements: Openings and closings in video-mediated tele-homecare encounters. Social Interaction. Video-based Studies of Human Sociality, 3(3). [URL].
Jefferson, G. (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 79–96). Irvington: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A., & Ferber, A. (1973). A description of some human greetings. In R. P. Michael, & J. H. Crook (Eds.), Comparative ecology and behaviour of primates (pp. 591–668). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koivisto, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (2021). OKAY as a response to informings in Finnish. In E. Betz, A. Deppermann, L. Mondada, & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), OKAY across Languages: Toward a comparative approach to its use in talk-in-interaction (pp. 206–233). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laurier, E. (2008). Drinking up endings: Conversational resources of the café. Language & Communication, 28(2), 165–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LeBaron, C. D., & Jones, S. E. (2002). Closing up closings: Showing the relevance of the social and material surround to the completion of an interaction. Journal of Communication, 52(3), 542–565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Licoppe, C., & Morel, J. (2012). Video-in-interaction: “Talking heads” and the multimodal organization of mobile and Skype video calls. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(4), 399–429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luff, P., Heath, C., Kuzuoka, H., Hindmarsh, J., Yamazaki, K., & Oyama, S. (2003). Fractured ecologies: Creating environments for collaboration. Human–Computer Interaction, 18(1), 51–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mlynář, J., González-Martínez, E., & Lalanne, D. (2018). Situated organization of video-mediated interaction: A review of ethnomethodological and conversation analytic studies. Interacting with Computers, 30(2), 73–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2014). The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 651, 137–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Conventions for multimodal transcription, version 5.0.1. Available at [URL] (accessed June 3, 2021).
Mondada, L., Bänninger, J., Bouaouina, S. A., Camus, L., Gauthier, G., Hänggi, P., Koda, M., Svensson, H., & Tekin, B. S. (2020). Human sociality in the times of the Covid-19 pandemic: A systematic examination of change in greetings. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 24(4), 441–468. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nielsen, M. F. (2013). “Stepping stones” in opening and closing department meetings. International Journal of Business Communication, 50(1), 34–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pillet-Shore, D. (2008). Coming together: Creating and maintaining social relationships through the openings of face-to-face interactions. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.
(2012). Greeting: Displaying stance through prosodic recipient design. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(4), 375–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). How to begin. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(3), 213–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raevaara, L. (1989). No – vuoronalkuinen partikkeli [No – turn-initial particle]. In A. Hakulinen (Ed.), Suomalaisen keskustelun keinoja I (pp. 147–161). Helsinki: Department of Finnish Language, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rintel, S. (2013a). Tech-tied or tongue-tied? Technological versus social trouble in relational video calling. Proceedings of the Forty-Sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2013, 3433–3352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013b). Video calling in long-distance relationships: The opportunistic use of audio/video distortions as a relational resource. The Electronic Journal of Communication / La Revue Electronic de Communication, 23(1–2).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, J. D. (1998). Getting down to business: talk, gaze, and body orientation during openings of doctor-patient consultations. Human Communication Research, 25(1), 97–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, J. D., & Stivers, T. (2001). Achieving activity transitions in physician-patient encounters. From history taking to physical examination. Human Communication Research, 27(2), 253–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossano, F. (2012). Gaze behavior in face-to-face interaction. Doctoral dissertation. Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen. [URL]
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 91, 111–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in conversation analysis. Volume 11. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siitonen, P., & Siromaa, M. (2021). Accounting for leaving the break room: Work obligations as a resource in transitions from one activity to another at the workplace. Journal of Pragmatics, 1711, 178–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorjonen, M.-L., & Raevaara, L. (2006). Kuinka päästä alkuun? Asiointikeskustelun aloittamistavoista [How do I get started? About the manners of initiating conversations]. In M.-L. Sorjonen, & L. Raevaara (Eds.), Arjen asiointia. Keskusteluja Kelan tiskin äärellä (pp. 48–85). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stommel, W., van Goor, H., & Stommel, M. (2019). Other-attentiveness in video consultation openings: A conversation analysis of video-mediated versus face-to-face consultations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(6), 275–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sutinen, M. (2014). Negotiating favourable conditions for resuming suspended activities. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction. Beyond multitasking (pp. 137–165). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svinhufvud, K., & Vehviläinen, S. (2013). Papers, documents, and the opening of an academic supervision encounter. Text & Talk, 33(1), 139–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tuncer, S. (2015). Walking away: An embodied resource to close informal encounters in offices. Journal of Pragmatics, 761, 101–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tuncer, S., & Licoppe, C. (2018). Open door environments as interactional resources to initiate unscheduled encounters in office organizations. Culture and Organization, 24(1), 11–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Peteri, Virve, Kirsti Lempiäinen & Merja Kinnunen
2025. A break room as spatial and material order for interaction. Culture and Organization 31:1 ► pp. 46 ff. DOI logo
Ruth, Fabian, Carmen Lipphardt, Marco Schickel, Evelin Ruth-Herbein & Tobias Ringeisen
2025. Online presentations for instruction: an overview. Frontiers in Education 10 DOI logo
Vänttinen, Minttu
2025. Constructing interactional space across distant locations in a hybrid classroom. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 54 ► pp. 100940 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

video

Example 1 - video

Example 2 - video

Example 3 - video

Example 4 - video

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue