Learning from an avatar video instructor
The role of gesture mimicry
Published online: 18 May 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.18019.ves
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.18019.ves
Abstract
Teachers often produce gestures, and, in some cases, students mimic their teachers’ gestures and adopt them into their own repertoires. However, little research has explored the role of gesture mimicry in technology-based learning contexts. In this research, we examined variations in the rate and form of students’ gestures when learning from a computer-animated pedagogical avatar. Twenty-four middle school students received a lesson on polynomial multiplication from a gesturing avatar video instructor. After the lesson, students were asked to provide an explanation of what they learned. Students varied in their gesture rates, and some students produced gestures that were similar in form to the avatar’s gestures. Students who produced gestures that aligned with the teacher’s gestures scored higher than those who did not produce such gestures. These results suggest that middle school students’ gestures play a key role when learning a mathematics lesson from an avatar instructor.
Keywords: gesture mimicry, avatar instructor, algebra, instructional technology
Article outline
- Method
- Participants
- Design and procedure
- Materials
- Pretest
- Lesson
- Explanation
- Midtest
- Posttest
- Transfer test
- Coding
- Scoring
- Gesture
- Results
- Pretest
- Explanation
- Learning from the lesson
- Discussion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (47)
Adamo-Villani, Nicoletta, Wilbur, Ronnie, Eccarius, Petra, & Abe-Harris, Laverne. (2009). Effects of character geometric model on the perception of sign language animation. Proceedings of the 2009 Second International Conference in Visualization (pp. 72–75). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
Anasingaraju, Saikiran, Wu, Meng-Lin, Adamo-Villani, Nicoletta, Popescu, Voicu, Cook, Susan W., Nathan, Mitchell, & Alibali, Martha W. (2016). Digital learning activities delivered by eloquent instructor avatars: Scaling with problem instance. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia 2016 Symposium on Education, Article 5, 1–7. New York, NY: ACM.
Alibali, Martha W., Flevares, Lucia M., & Goldin-Meadow, Susan. (1997). Assessing knowledge conveyed in gesture: Do teachers have the upper hand? Journal of Educational Psychology, 891, 183–193.
Alibali, Martha W., Spencer, Robert C., Knox, Lucy, & Kita, Sotaro. (2011). Spontaneous gestures influence strategy choices in problem solving. Psychological Science, 22 (9), 1138–1144.
Baylor, Amy L. (2003, July). The impact of three pedagogical agent roles. In Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 928–929). ACM.
Berch, Denise, Singleton, Jenny L., & Perry, Michelle. (1995). Many hands make learning math easy. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis, IN.
Broaders, Sara C., Cook, Susan W., Mitchell, Zachary, & Goldin-Meadow, Susan. (2007). Making children gesture brings out implicit knowledge and leads to learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136 (4), 539–550.
Buisine, Stéphanie & Martin, Jean-Claude. (2007). The effects of speech–gesture cooperation in animated agents’ behavior in multimedia presentations. Interacting with Computers, 19 (4), 484–493.
Cassell, Justine, Sullivan, Joseph, Prevost, Scott, & Churchill, Elizabeth. (2000). Embodied conversational agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Church, Ruth Breckinridge, Ayman-Nolley, Saba, & Mahootian, Shahrzad. (2004). The role of gesture in bilingual education: Does gesture enhance learning? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 7 (4), 303–319.
Church, Ruth Breckinridge & Goldin-Meadow, Susan. (1986). The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition, 23 (1), 43–71.
Cook, Susan W., Duffy, Ryan G., & Fenn, Kimberly M. (2013). Consolidation and transfer of learning after observing hand gesture. Child Development, 84 (6), 1863–1871.
Cook, Susan W., Friedman, Howard S., Duggan, Katherine A., Cui, Jian, & Popescu, Voicu. (2017). Hand gesture and mathematics learning: lessons from an Avatar. Cognitive Science, 41 (2), 518–535.
Cook, Susan W. & Goldin-Meadow, Susan. (2006). The role of gesture in learning: Do children use their hands to change their minds? Journal of Cognition and Development, 7 (2), 211–232.
Cook, Susan W., Mitchell, Zachary, & Goldin-Meadow, Susan. (2008). Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition, 106 (2), 1047–1058.
Davis, Robert O. (2018). The impact of pedagogical agent gesturing in multimedia learning environments: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 241, 193–209.
ELAN (Version 5.0.0-beta) [Computer software]. (2017, April 18). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Retrieved from [URL]
Fyfe, Emily R., Alibali, Martha W., & Nathan, Mitchell. (2017). The promise and pitfalls of making connections in mathematics. In E. Galindo & J. Newton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 717–724). Indianapolis, IN: Hoosier Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. (2005). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Alibali, Martha W. (2013). Gesture’s role in speaking, learning, and creating language. Annual Review of Psychology, 641, 8.1–8.27.
Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Beilock, Sian L. (2010). Action’s influence on thought: The case of gesture. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5 (6), 664–674.
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Cook, Susan W., & Mitchell, Zachary A. (2009). Gesturing gives children new ideas about math. Psychological Science, 20 (3), 267–272.
Holmes, Jeffrey. (2007). Designing agents to support learning by explaining. Computers & Education, 48 (4), 523–547.
Hostetter, Autumn B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137 (2), 297.
Kimbara, Irene. (2006). On gestural mimicry. Gesture, 6(1), 39–61.
Kelly, Spencer D., Church, Ruth Breckinridge, & Alibali, Martha W. (2017). Understanding gesture: Description, mechanism, function. In Ruth Breckinridge Church, Martha W. Alibali, & Spencer D. Kelly (Eds.), Why gesture? How the hands function in speaking, thinking, and communicating (pp. 3–10). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kontra, Carly, Goldin-Meadow, Susan, & Beilock, Sian L. (2012). Embodied learning across the life span. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4 (4), 731–739.
Lester, James C., Converse, Sharolyn A., Kahler, Susan E., Barlow, S. Todd, Stone, Brian A., & Bhogal, Ravinder S. (1997, March). The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 359–366). ACM.
Libertus, Klaus & Needham, Amy. (2010). Teach to reach: The effects of active vs. passive reaching experiences on action and perception. Vision Research, 50 (24), 2750–2757.
Louwerse, M. Max, Graesser, Arthur C., McNamara, Danielle S., & Lu, Shulan. (2009). Embodied conversational agents as conversational partners. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 231, 1244–1255.
Lusk, Mary M. & Atkinson, Robert K. (2007). Animated pedagogical agents: Does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples? Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 21 (6), 747–764.
McNeill, David. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moreno, Roxana & Mayer, Richard. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19 (3), 309–326.
Mori, Masahiro, MacDorman, Karl F., & Kageki, Norri. (2012). The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19 (2), 98–100.
Moses, Robert P. & Cobb, Charles E. (2001). Radical equations: Math literacy and civil rights. Boston: Beacon Press.
Nathan, Mitchell J. & Walkington, Candace. (2017). Grounded and embodied mathematical cognition: Promoting mathematical insight and proof using action and language. Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2 (1), 9.
NGACBP (National Governors Association Center for Best Practices) & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.
de Nooijer, Jacqueline A., Van Gog, Tamara, Paas, Fred, & Zwaan, Rolf A. (2013). Effects of imitating gestures during encoding or during retrieval of novel verbs on children’s test performance. Acta Psychologica, 144 (1), 173–179.
Noma, Tsukasa, Zhao, Liwei, & Badler, Norman I. (2000). Design of a virtual human presenter. IEEE Computer Graphics Applications, 20 (4), 49–85.
Parrill, Fey & Kimbara, Irene. (2006). Seeing and hearing double: The influence of mimicry in speech and gesture on observers. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30 (4), 157–166.
Ping, Raedy & Goldin-Meadow, Susan. (2008). Hands in the air: Using ungrounded iconic gestures to teach children conservation of quantity. Developmental Psychology, 44 (5), 1277–1287.
Popescu, Voicu, Adamo-Villani, Nicoletta, Wu, Meng-Lin, Rajesakaran, Suren D., Alibali, Martha W., Nathan, Mitchell J., & Cook, Susan W. (2014, April). Animation killed the video star. Paper presented at the CHI (Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems), Satellite Workshop on Gesture-Based Interaction Design: Communication and Cognition. Toronto, Canada.
Singer, Melissa A. & Goldin-Meadow, Susan. (2005). Children learn when their teacher’s gestures and speech differ. Psychological Science, 16 (2), 85–89.
Tellier, Marion. (2008). The effect of gestures on second language memorisation by young children. Gesture, 8 (2), 219–235.
Valenzeno, Laura, Alibali, Martha W., & Klatzky, Roberta. (2003). Teachers’ gestures facilitate students’ learning: A lesson in symmetry. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28 (2), 187–204.
Yeo, Amelia, Cook, Susan W., Nathan, Mitchell J., Popescu, Voicu, & Alibali, Martha W. (2018). Instructor gesture improves encoding of mathematical representations. In T. T. Rogers, M. Rau, X. Zhu, & C. W. Kalish (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2723–2728).
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Islam, Md Zabirul & Ge Wang
Alibali, Martha W. & Autumn B. Hostetter
Markut, Jacob Jan & Donald J. Wink
Santosa, Made Hery & Safitry Wahyuni
Walkington, Candace, Mitchell J. Nathan, Wen Huang, Jonathan Hunnicutt & Julianna Washington
Alibali, Martha W., Anna N. Bartel & Amelia Yeo
Ocak, Ceren, Theodore J. Kopcha & Raunak Dey
Zaman, Ulia
Michaelis, Joseph E & Daniela Di Canio
Vest, Nicholas A., Shawn E. Fagan & Emily R. Fyfe
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
