Open Hand Prone as a resource in multimodal claims to interruption
Stopping a co-participant’s turn-at-talk
Published online: 26 June 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.17002.kam
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.17002.kam
Abstract
This paper examines the Open Hand Prone ‘vertical palm’ as a resource for participants in conversation for displaying their treatment of a co-participant’s – or their own – turn/action as interruptive. Through this practice participants can manage turn-taking by making it relevant for the co-participant to stop talking. The data for this study consist of video-recorded conversations in English and Finnish from domestic and institutional settings, as well as broadcast talk. Using multimodal conversation analysis, this study shows that the gesture occurs in situations involving overlapping/competitive talk or incompatible embodied activities that somehow affect the progressivity of the ongoing talk. This paper complements previous research on gesture studies and interaction by investigating the function these gestures take in stopping/interrupting a co-participant’s turn-at-talk across multiple settings, and by studying how the gesture functions as a part of a practice which has direct social consequences on the local organization of turn-taking.
Article outline
- Introduction
- The Open Hand Prone ‘vertical palm’ and gestures in turn-taking
- Analysis
- Claiming continued speakership: Interrupting an incipient and emerging turn
- ‘Legitimate’ interrupting and interruption as a joint action
- Managing turn-taking in situations with multiactivity
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (59)
Bressem, Jana & Cornelia Müller (2014a). A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, and Jana Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 21, pp. 1558–1574). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
(2014b). The family of Away gestures: Negation, refusal, and negative assessment. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, and Jana Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 21, pp. 1592–1604). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Brookes, Heather (2004). A repertoire of South African quotable gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14 (2), 186–224.
Calbris, Geneviève (1990). The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
(2011). Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Clayman, Steven (2015). Broadcast news interviews, In Karen Tracy, Cornelia Ilie, & Todd Sandel (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 1–19). London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
Clayman, Steven & John Heritage (2002). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Craven, Alexandra & Jonathan Potter (2010). Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 121, 419–442.
Deppermann, Arnulf (Ed.) (2013a). Special Issue: Conversation analytic studies of multimodal interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 46 (1), 1–172.
(2013b). Turn-design at turn-beginnings: Multimodal resources to deal with tasks of turn-construction in German. Journal of Pragmatics, 46 (1), 91–121.
Drew, Paul (2009). ‘Quit talking while I’m interrupting’: a comparison between positions of overlap onset in conversation. In Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, & Jan Lindström (Eds.), Talk in interaction – comparative dimensions (pp. 70–93). Helsinki: SKS.
Duncan, Starkey (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23 (2), 283–292.
Ervin-Tripp, Susan (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in society, 5 (1), 25–66.
Ford, Cecilia E. (2001). At the intersection of turn and sequence: Negation and what comes next. In Margret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Studies in interactional linguistics (pp. 51–79). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, & Sandra A. Thompson (1996). Practices in the construction of turns: The “TCU” revisited. Pragmatics, 6 (3), 427–454.
Haddington, Pentti, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, & Maurice Nevile (Eds.) (2014). Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Harrison, Simon (2009a). Grammar, gesture, and cognition: The case of negation in English. PhD Thesis. Université Michel de Montaigne, Bourdeaux 3.
(2009b). The expression of negation through grammar and gesture. In Jordan Zlatev, Mats Andrén, Marlene Johansson Falck, & Carita Lundmark (Eds.), Studies in language and cognition (pp. 421–435). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Heritage, John (1985). Analyzing news interviews: aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In Teun A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 31, pp. 95–117) London: Academic Press.
Jefferson, Gail (1984). Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. In Valentina D’Urso & Paolo Leonardi (Eds.), Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric (pp. 11–38). Padua, Italy: Cleup Editore.
(2004a). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2004b). A sketch of some orderly aspects of overlap in natural conversation. In Gene Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 43–59). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 43–59.
Keisanen, Tiina, Mirkka Rauniomaa, & Pentti Haddington (2014). Suspending a course of action: Managing incompatibility in moments of multiactivity. In Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, & Maurice Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 109–133). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kita, Sotaro, van Gijn, I., van der Hulst, H. (1998). Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcription by human coders. In Wachsmuth, I. and Fröhlich, M. (Eds.), Gesture and sign language in human-computer interaction: International gesture workshop Bielefeld, Germany, September 17–19, 1997: Proceedings (pp. 23–35). Berlin & London: Springer.
Ladewig, Silva H. (2014). Recurrent gestures. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Jana Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 21, pp. 1558–1574). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Laursen, Lone (2005). Towards an embodied grammar: gesture in tying practices constructing obvious cohesion. In Interacting Bodies: Online Proceedings of the 2nd ISGS Conference (pp. 15–18).
Licoppe, C. & Tuncer, S. (2014). Attending to a summons and putting other activities ‘on hold’: Multiactivity as a recognisable interactional accomplishment. In Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, & Maurice Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 167–190). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
McNeill, David (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mondada, Lorenza (2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking: pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9 (2), 194–224.
(2012). The dynamics of embodied participation and language choice in multilingual meetings. Language in Society, 411, 1–23.
(2013). Embodied and spatial resources for turn-taking in institutional multi-party interactions: Participatory democracy debates. Journal of Pragmatics, 46 (1), 39–68.
(2014a). The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 651, 137–156.
(2014b). Conventions for multimodal transcription. [URL] (accessed June 12, 2018).
(2016a). Multimodal resources and the organization of social interaction. Verbal Communication, 31, 329–349.
(2016b). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20 (3), 336–366.
Mondada, Lorenza & Florence Oloff (2011). Gesture in overlap: the situated establishment of speakership. In Gale Stam & Mika Ishino. Integrating gesture (pp. 321–337). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Müller, Cornelia (2017). How recurrent gestures mean. Gesture, 16 (2), 277–304.
Nevile, Maurice (2015). The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48 (2), 121–151.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, & Gail Jefferson (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50 (4), 696–735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentces. In Deborah Tannen (Ed.), Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics (pp. 71–93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
(1984). On some gesture’s relation to talk. In John Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 266–298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1996). Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, & Sandra A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29 (1), 1–63.
(2002). Accounts of conduct in interaction: Interruption, overlap, and turn-taking. In Jonathan H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 287–321). New York: Kluwer Academic & Plenum Publishers.
Sikveland, Rein Ove & Richard Ogden (2012). Holding gestures across turns: Moments to generate shared understanding. Gesture, 12 (2), 166–199.
Stivers, Tanya (2004). “No no no” and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research, 30 (2), 260–293.
Stivers, Tanya & Jeffrey D. Robinson (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35 (3), 367–392.
Streeck, Jürgen & Ulrike Hartge (1992). Gestures at the transition place. In Peter Auer & Aldo di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 135–157). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sutinen, M. (2014). Negotiating favourable conditions for resuming suspended activities. In Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, & Maurice Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 137–165). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Walker, Gareth (2010). The phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice: Rush-throughs in English talk-in-interaction. In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, & Margret Selting (Eds.), Prosody in interaction (pp. 51–72). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Weatherall, Ann & David M. Edmonds (2018). Speakers formulating their talk as interruptive. Journal of Pragmatics, 1231, 11–23.
Wehling, Elisabeth (2009). Argument is gesture war: Function, form, and prosody of discourse structuring gestures in political argument. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 35 (2), 54–65.
(2017). Discourse management gestures. Gesture, 16 (2), 245–276.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Dyrmo, Tomasz
Wu, Suwei, Alan Cienki & Yaoyao Chen
Corella, Meghan
Satti, Ignacio
Kamunen, Antti, Pentti Haddington & Iira Rautiainen
Ferrara, Lindsay
Gawne, Lauren, Chelsea Krajcik, Helene N. Andreassen, Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker & Barbara F. Kelly
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
