The coordination of moves in Aikido interaction
Published online: 19 July 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.15.2.01lef
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.15.2.01lef
Relying on the analysis of naturally occurring interaction recordings, this article proposes the moment-by-moment description of a specific type of focused interaction, the interaction of the martial art Aikido. In Aikido encounters, participants exchange moves of attack, defense, avoidance also using a “weapon”. These “Aikido movements”, as I shall call them, are articulated by the whole body and serve as projectable interactional units. Aikido movements appear as highly ordered minimal units of the practitioners’ activity which are coordinated between them in space and time. Central in this account is the description of the interactional space elaborated through the moving transactional segments of the practitioners. I suggest that the description of the visible bodily actions of Aikido opens a range of questions concerning the social and interactional construction of human perception in any activity involving whole body movements. As visible actions, Aikido movement and gesture share the property of becoming units of the social activity they organize.
References (39)
Clayman, Steven E. & Douglas W. Maynard (1995). Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. In Paul ten Have & George Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp. 1–30). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
Coates, Sally (1999). Analysing the physical: An ethnomethodological study of boxing. Ethnographic Studies, 41, 14–26.
Garfinkel, Harold & Harvey Sacks (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In John C. McKinney & Edward A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 337–366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Garfinkel, Harold & D. Lawrence Wieder (1992). Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In Graham Watson & Robert M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 175–206). Newbury Park: Sage.
Goffman, Erving (1963). Behavior in public places. Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: The Free Press.
Goodwin, Charles (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In George Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). New York: Irvington Publishers.
(2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 321, 1489–1522.
Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie Harness Goodwin (2004). Participation. In Alessandro Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 222–244). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Haddington, Pentti, Lorenza Mondada, & Maurice Nevile (2013). Being mobile: Interaction on the move. In Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, & Maurice Nevile (Eds.), Interaction and mobility: Language and body in motion (pp. 3–61). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Haddington, Pentti, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, & Maurice Nevile (2014). Towards multiactivity as a social and interactional phenomenon. In Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, & Maurice Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 3–32). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hayashi, Makoto (2004). Projection and grammar: Notes on the ‘action-projecting’ use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 361, 1337–1374.
Heath Christian, Jon Hindmarsh, & Paul Luff (2010). Video in qualitative research. Analysing social interaction in everyday life. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Heritage, John & J. Maxwell Atkinson (1984). Introduction. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 1–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kendon, Adam (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lefebvre, Augustin (2011). Approche ethnométhodologique de l’accomplissement d’une figure à deux: spatialité et temporalité dans la pratique de l’aïkido. PhD Thesis, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 31.
Lerner, Gene H. (2002). Turn-sharing: the choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. In Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara Fox, & Sandra Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 225–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mauss, Marcel ([1934] 1950). Les techniques du corps. In Marcel Mauss (Ed.), Anthropologie et sociologie (pp. 365–386). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Mead, George Herbert (1934). Mind, self and society. From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Charles W. Morris (Ed.). Chicago: University Press.
Mondada, Lorenza (2006a). Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: Projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies, 81 (
Special issue on Discourse, Interaction and Cognition
), 117–129.
(2006b). Video recording as the reflexive preservation-configuration of phenomenal features for analysis. In Hubert Knoblauch, Bernt Schnettler, Jürgen Raab, & Hans-Georg Soeffner (Eds.), Video analysis. Methodology and methods. Qualitative audiovisual data analysis (pp. 51–68). Bern: Lang.
(2009). Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics, 411, 1977–1997.
(2013). Interactional space and the study of embodied talk-interaction. In Peter Auer, Martin Hilpert, Anja Stukenbrock, & Bernd Szmrecsanyi, (Eds.), Space in language and linguistics: Geographical, interactional and cognitive perspectives (pp. 247–275). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Sacks, Harvey (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 21–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, & Gail Jefferson (1974). A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 501, 696–735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 701, 1075–1095.
. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schindler, Larissa (2009). The production of “vis-ability”: An ethnographic video analysis of a martial arts class. In Ulrike Tikvah Kissmann (Ed.), Video interaction analysis. Methods and methodology (pp. 135–153). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Schütz, Alfred (1962). Collected papers: The problem of social reality. Maurice Natason (Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Streeck, Jürgen (2009a). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
ten Have, Paul (2002). The notion of member is the heart of the matter: On the role of membership knowledge in ethnomethodological inquiry [53 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3 (3), Art. 21, [URL]
Cited by (15)
Cited by 15 other publications
Churchill, Eton
Harjunpää, Katariina & Joonas Råman
Okada, Misao
Corsby, Charles L. T., Raul Sánchez-García & K. Neil Jenkings
Romanova, Victoria, Olha Serputko & Svetlana Stepanyuk
2024. TEACHING OF ACROBATIC EXERCISES IN AIKIDO AND CAPOEIRA FOR ADULTS OF THE FIRST AND SECOND PERIOD OF ADULTHOOD. Scientific Journal of National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Series 15. Scientific and pedagogical problems of physical culture (physical culture and sports) :1(173) ► pp. 28 ff.
Serputko, Olha, Svetlana Stepanyuk, Inna Gorodynska, Victoria Koval & Yuriy Grabovsky
Yagi, Junichi
Bovet, Alain
Lefebvre, Augustin
Gawne, Lauren, Chelsea Krajcik, Helene N. Andreassen, Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker & Barbara F. Kelly
Råman, Joonas
Filho, Edson & Jean Rettig
2018. Team coordination in high-risk circus acrobatics. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 19:3 ► pp. 499 ff.
Muntanyola‐Saura, Dafne & Raúl Sánchez‐García
Råman, Joonas & Pentti Haddington
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
