Multifunctionality of hand gestures and material conduct during closing argument
Published online: 19 May 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.15.1.04mat
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.15.1.04mat
Closing argument represents the most crucial part of the adversarial system of justice. For attorneys, it provides an opportunity to showcase their persuasive skills through the full range of semiotic resources at their disposal. While studies of legal discourse have examined speech performance, few studies, if any, have analyzed how speech integrates with gesture and material conduct in the production of persuasive oratory. This work demonstrates the role of multimodal and material action in concert with speech and how an attorney employs hand movements, material objects, and speech to reinforce significant points of evidence for the jury. More theoretically, we demonstrate how beat gestures and material objects synchronize with speech to not only accentuate rhythm and foreground points of evidential significance but, at certain moments, invoke semantic imagery as well.
Keywords: speaker alignment, legal discourse, beat gestures, material conduct
References (54)
Aijmer, Karin (2002). English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Alibali, Martha, Dana Heath, & Heather Myers (2001). Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: Some gestures are meant to be seen. Journal of Memory and Language, 44 (2), 169–188.
Bavelas, Janet, Nicole Chovil, Douglas A. Lawrie, & Allan Wade (1992). Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15 (4), 469–489.
Bavelas, Janet (1994). Gestures as part of speech: Methodological implications. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27 (3), 201–221.
Bavelas, Janet, Nichole Chovil, Lina Coates, & Lori Roe (1995). Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21 (4), 394–405.
Bulwer, John (2003 [1644]). Chirologia or the natural language of the hand. Whitefish, Montana: Kessinger Publishing.
Carter, Ronald & Michael McCarthy (2006). Cambridge grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Jorio, Andrea (2000). Gesture in Naples and gesture in classical antiquity. A translation of La mimica degli antichi investigata nel gestire napoletano (1832), with an introduction and notes by Adam Kendon. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
de Ruiter, Jan (2012). Introduction: Questions are what they do. In Jan de Ruiter (Ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 1–7). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Faudree, Paja (2009). Linguistic Anthropology in 2008: An election-cycle guide. American Anthropologist, 111 (2), 153–161.
Haviland, John B. (2003). How to point in Zinacantan. In Sotaro Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 139–169). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
. (2006). Gesture: Sociocultural analysis. In Keith Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edition, Vol. 51 (pp. 66–71). Oxford: Elsevier.
Heath, Christian, Jon Hindmarsh, & Paul Luff (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analyzing social interaction in everyday life. Los Angeles: Sage.
Heritage, John & David Greatbatch (1986). Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. American Journal of Sociology, 92 (1), 110–157.
Hindmarsh, Jon & Christian Heath (2000). Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 321, 1855–1878.
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jakobson, Roman (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jefferson, Gail (1991). List construction as a task and resource. In George Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 63–92). New York: Irvington Publishers.
Komter, Martha (2006). From talk to text: The interactional construction of a police record. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39 (3), 201–228.
Krahmer, Emiel & Marc Swerts (2007). The effects of visual beats on prosodic prominence: Acoustic analyses, auditory perception and visual perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 57 (3), 396–414.
Leonard, Thomas & Fred Cummins (2011). The temporal relation between beat gestures and speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26 (10), 1457–1471.
Matoesian, Gregory (2001). Law and the language of identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith rape trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maynard, Douglas (2006). Comment – bad news and good news: Losing vs. finding the phenomenon in legal settings. Law & Social Inquiry, 31 (2), 477–497.
McClave, Evelyn (1994). Gestural beats: The rhythm hypothesis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23 (1), 45–66.
(2006). Gesture and communication. In Keith Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Linguistics, 2nd edition, Vol. 51 (pp. 58–67). New York: Elsevier.
(2012). How language began: Gesture and speech in human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, Sigrid (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. New York: Routledge.
Quintilian (2001). The orator’s education, trans. Donald A. Russell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rosulek, Laura Felton (2008). Manipulative silence and social representation in the closing arguments of a child sexual abuse case. Text & Talk, 28 (4), 529–550.
(2010). Prosecution and defense closing speeches: The creation of contrastive closing arguments. In Malcolm Coulthard & Alison Johnson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (pp. 218–230). New York: Routledge.
Sasaki, Yoshinori (1991). An analysis of sentences with nonreferential there in spoken American English. Word, 42 (2), 157–178.
Stam, Gale & Mike Ishino (Eds.) (2011). Integrating gestures: The interdisciplinary nature of gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2008). Gesture in political communication: A case study of the democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41 (2), 154–186.
(2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tannen, Deborah (1987). Repetition in conversation: Toward a poetics of talk. Language, 631, 574–605.
van der Houwen, Fleur (2013). Reported writing in court: Putting evidence “on record”. Text and Talk, 33 (6), 747–769.
van der Houwen, Fleur & Petra Sneijder (forthcoming). From text to talk in criminal court: Prosecuting, defending, and examining the evidence. In Sigurd D’hondt & Fleur van der Houwen (Eds.), Quoting from the case file: Intertextuality in judicial settings. (Special issue: Language & Communication, 33 (2)).
Wollock, Jeffrey (2002). John Bulwer (1606–1656) and the significance of gesture in the 17th century. Gesture, 2 (2), 227–258.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Yang, Min & Min Wang
Didoni, Elena & Claudia Roberta Combei
Gawne, Lauren, Chelsea Krajcik, Helene N. Andreassen, Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker & Barbara F. Kelly
Chaemsaithong, Krisda
2018. Investigating audience orientation in courtroom communication. Pragmatics and Society 9:4 ► pp. 545 ff.
Lempert, Michael
Matoesian, Gregory
Gilbert, Kristin Enola
Gilbert, Kristin Enola
Gilbert, Kristin Enola
Gilbert, Kristin Enola & Gregory M. Matoesian
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
