Cover not available

Article published In: Gesture
Vol. 15:1 (2016) ► pp.60–78

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Obligatory processing of irrelevant gesture

 | A*STAR — Institute of High Performance Computing, Singapore
 | Oxford Brookes University
Published online: 19 May 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.15.1.03fel
This paper presents a study of selected iconic gestures with a view to determining their effects on RT in a task-relevant and a task-irrelevant context. In two experiments, participants were presented with a coloured shape on a computer screen, a spoken statement referring to the presented shape, and a gesture that was task irrelevant. The findings from both experiments show strong support for the assumption that gesture processing is obligatory; irrelevant gestures affected speed of task performance. Furthermore the findings suggest that for slower, more cognitively controlled decisions incongruent gestures have an inhibitory effect, while for faster, more cognitively automated decisions congruent gestures have a facilitatory effect.
References (40)
Barrett, Lisa F., Christine D. Wilson-Mendenhall, & Lawrence W. Barsalou (2014). A psychological construction account of emotion regulation and dysregulation: The role of situated conceptualizations. In James J. Gross (Ed.), The handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 447–465). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 221, 577–660. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W. & Katja Wiemer-Hastings (2005). Situated abstract concepts. In Diane Pecher & Rolf A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 129–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin (2012). Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernardis, Paolo, Elena Salillas, & Nicoletta Caramelli (2008). Behavioural and neurophysiological evidence of semantic interaction between iconic gestures and words. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25 (7/8), 1114–1128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloem, Ineke, Sylvia van den Boogaard, & Wido La Heij (2004). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 511, 307–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diederich, Adele & Hans Colonius (2015). The time window of multisensory integration: Relating reaction times and judgments of temporal order. Psychological Review, 2015, Feb 23. Online at [URL], last date of access 20 March 2015. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gellatly, Angus R.H. & Vernon H. Gregg (1974). The effect of set size on the latency to name words. Acta Psychologica, 381, 93–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre, Özyürek, Aslı, Özge Gürcanli, & Susan Goldin-Meadow (2013). Spatial language facilitates spatial cognition: Evidence from children who lack language input. Cognition, 1271, 318–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. (2003). Embodied experience and linguistic meaning. Brain & Language, 841, 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsday: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glenberg, Arthur M. & Michael P. Kaschak (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulleting & Review, 91, 558–565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hauk, Olaf, Ingrid Johnsrude, & Friedemann Pulvermueller (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 411, 301–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holle, Henning & Thomas C. Gunter (2007). The role of iconic gestures in speech disambiguation: ERP evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19 (7), 1175–1192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hostetter, Autumn B. & Martha W. Alibali (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15 (3), 495–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, Spencer D., Aslı Özyürek, & Eric Maris (2010). Two sides of the same coin: Speech and gesture mutually interact to enhance comprehension. Psychological Science, 211, 260–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, Spencer D., Peter Creigh, & James Bartolotti (2010). Integrating speech and iconic gestures in a Stroop-like task: Evidence for automatic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 221, 683–694. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNamara, Timothy P. (2005). Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word recognition. New York: Psychology Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayr, Susanne & Alex Buchner (2007). Negative priming as a memory phenomenon. A review of 20 years of negative priming research. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 215 (1), 35–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Metta, Giorgio, et al. (2008). The iCub humanoid robot: An open platform for research in embodied cognition. In Raj Madhavan & Elena R. Messina (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems (pp. 50–56). New York: ACM. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neely, James H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In Derek Besner & Glyn W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neggers, Bas & Harold Bekkering (2001). Gaze anchoring to a pointing target is present during the entire pointing movement and is driven by a non-visual signal. Journal of Neurophysiology, 861, 961–970. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niebur, Ernst, et al. (2001). Research, robots, and reality: A statement on current trends in biorobotics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24 (6), 1072–1073. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Obermeier, Christian & Thomas C. Gunter (2014). Multisensory integration: The case of a time window of gesture-speech integration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27 (2), 292–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pouw, Wim T.J.L. et al. (2014). Toward a more embedded/extended perspective on the cognitive function of gestures. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse J. & Lawrence W. Barsalou (2000). Steering a course for embodied representation. In Eric Dietrich & Arthur B. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual and representational change in humans and machines (pp. 51–77). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, Giacomo & Laila Craighero (2004). The mirror neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 271, 169–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, Giacomo, Luciano Fadiga, Vittorio Gallese, & Leonardo Fogassi (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 31, 131–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seliger, Herbert (1980). Utterance planning and correction behavior: Its function in the grammar construction process for second language learners. In Hans W. Dechert & Manfred Raupach (Eds.), Towards a crosslinguistic assessment of speech production (pp. 87–99). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
So, Wing-Chee, Alvan Low Yi-Feng, De-Fu Yap, Eugene Kheng, & Ju-Min Melvin Yap (2013). Iconic gestures prime words: Comparison of priming effects when gestures are presented alone and when they are accompanying speech. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 779. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tipper, Steven P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 37 (4), 571–590. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tversky, Barbara & Brigitte M. Hard (2009). Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective taking. Cognition, 1101, 124–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vacharkulksemsuk, Tanya & Barbara L. Fredrickson (2012). Strangers in sync: Achieving embodied rapport through shared movements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 481, 399–402. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vainiger, Dana, Ludovica Labruna, Richard Ivry, & Michal Lavidor (2014). Beyond words: Evidence for automatic language–gesture integration of symbolic gestures but not dynamic landscapes. Psychological Research, 781, 55–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dantzig, Saskia, René Zeelenberg, & Diane Pecher (2009). Unconstraining theories of embodied cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 451, 345–351. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yap, De-Fu, Wing-Chee So, Yu-Min Melvin Yap, Tan, Ying-Quan, & Ruo-Li Serene Teoh (2011). Iconic gestures prime words. Cognitive Science, 35 (1), 171–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziemke, Tom & Robert Lowe (2009). On the role of emotion in embodied cognitive architectures: From organisms to robots. Cognitive Computation, 1 (1), 104–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Walsh, Erin I., Will J. Grant & Ginny M. Sargent
2024. Prose, panels and people: the impact of comic presentation style on procedural information learning. International Journal of Science Education, Part B 14:3 ► pp. 294 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue