How much can classifiers be analogous to their referents?
Published online: 12 December 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.1.01sut
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.1.01sut
Sign Language poetry is especially valued for its presentation of strong visual images. Here, we explore the highly visual signs that British Sign Language and American Sign Language poets create as part of the ‘classifier system’ of their languages. Signed languages, as they create visually-motivated messages, utilise categoricity (more traditionally considered ‘language’) and analogy (more traditionally considered extra-linguistic and the domain of ‘gesture’). Classifiers in sign languages arguably show both these characteristics (Oviedo, 2004). In our discussion of sign language poetry, we see that poets take elements that are widely understood to be highly visual, closely representing their referents, and make them even more highly visual — so going beyond categorisation and into new areas of analogue.
Keywords: sign languages, metaphor, poetry, classifiers, gesture, analogy
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Napoli, Donna Jo & Rachel Sutton-Spence
Napoli, Donna Jo & Lorraine Leeson
Ferrara, Casey & Donna Jo Napoli
Gawne, Lauren, Chelsea Krajcik, Helene N. Andreassen, Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker & Barbara F. Kelly
Hoeksema, Jack & Donna Jo Napoli
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
