Book review
. Handling digital brains: a laboratory study of multimodal semiotic interaction in the age of computers. Cambridge, MA & London, UK:: The MIT Press, (2011). 199 pp.
Reviewed by
Published online: 3 April 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.11.3.06sor
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.11.3.06sor
References (23)
Alač, Morana & Edwin Hutchins (2004). I see what you are saying: action as cognition in fMRI brain mapping practice, Journal of cognition and culture, 4 (3), 629–661.
Coulter, Jeff & Ed Parsons (1991). The praxiology of perception: visual orientations and practical action, Inquiry, 331, 251–72.
Coulter, Jeff & Wes Sharrock (2007). Brain, mind and human behavior in contemporary cognitive science. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.
Doing, Park (2008). Give me a laboratory and I will raise a discipline: the past, present, and future politics of laboratory studies in STS. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Waycman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 277–295). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Galison, Peter (1997). Image and logic: a material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Garfinkel, Harold (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Garfinkel, Harold & Harvey Sacks (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: perspectives and developments (pp. 337–366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Greiffenhagen, Christian & Rod Watson (2009). Visual repairables: analysing the work of repair in human-computer interaction, Visual communication, 8 (1), 65–90.
Hackett, Edward J., Olga Amsterdamska, M. Lynch & J. Waycman (2008). Introduction. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Waycman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 1–7). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lindstrom, Anna & Lorenza Mondada (2009). Assessments in social interaction: introduction to the special issue, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42 (4), 299–308.
Lynch, Michael (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science: a study of shop work and shop talk. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Mody, Cyrus C. M. & David Kaiser (2008). Scientific training and the creation of scientific knowledge. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Waycman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 377–402). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mol, Annemarie (2002). The body multiple: ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
Quere, Louis (2008). Les neurosciences fournissent-elles une explication ‘plus’ scientifique des phenomenes socio-culturels? Le cas de la confiance. In B. Lahire & C. Rosental (Eds.), La cognition au prisme des sciences sociales (pp. 23–54). Paris: Edition des archives contemporaines.
Schatzki, Theodore R. (2001). Introduction: practice theory. In Th. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London & New York: Routledge.
Slack, Roger, Mark Hartswood, R. Procter & M. Rouncefield (2007). Cultures of reading: On professional vision and the lived work of mammography. In S. Hester & D. Francis (Eds.), Orders of ordinary action: respecifying sociological knowledge (pp. 175–193). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Watson, Rod (1992). The understanding of language use in every day life: Is there a common ground? In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in Context: contributions to the ethnomethodology (pp. 1–19). London: Sage.