Cover not available

Article published In: Gesture
Vol. 16:3 (2017) ► pp.371–395

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Depicting and describing meanings with iconic signs in Norwegian Sign Language

 | Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim
 | Oslo University Hospital
Published online: 1 February 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.00001.fer
Abstract
There is growing momentum towards a theory of languaging that acknowledges the diverse semiotic repertoires people use with each other. This paper contributes to this goal by providing further evidence from signed language discourse. In particular, we examine iconic signs from Norwegian Sign Language, which can be interpreted as both “regular” lexical signs and token depictions. This dual potential is manipulated by signers in context. We analyze these signs as descriptions and depictions, two different modes of representation. Then we compare these signs to some of the description and depiction that occurs in spoken language discourse. In this way we aim to present some of the advantages of using description and depiction in analyses of communication and interaction. By doing this, we also forge links between the languaging of speakers and the languaging of signers.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Meaning construction through describing and depicting
  • Describing and depicting in spoken language discourse
    • Utterance visible action
    • Enactment
    • Ideophones
  • Describing and depicting in signed language discourse
    • Depicting signs
    • Enactment
    • Signs with two faces
    • Describing and depicting swimming in NTS
    • Depicting (and describing) sleeping in Norwegian Sign Language
    • Describing and depicting falling in Norwegian Sign Language
  • Accommodating depiction and description in a theory of languaging
    • The dual potential of iconic, depictive signed language signs
    • Similarities in describing and depicting in signed and spoken language discourse
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (75)
References
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden, & Wendy Sandler (2003). Classifier complexes and morphology in two sign languages. In Karen Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp. 53–84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergman, Brita & Östen Dahl (1994). Ideophones in sign language? The place of reduplication in the tense-aspect system of Swedish Sign Language. In Carl Bache, Hans Basbøll, & Carl-Erik Lindberg (Eds.), Tense, aspect and action: Empirical and theoretical contributions to language typology (pp. 397–422). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blyth, Carl, Sigrid Recktenwald, & Jenny Wang (1990). I’m like, “Say what?!”: A new quotative in American oral narrative. American Speech, 65 (3), 215–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calbris, Geneviève (2011). Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Richard (1998). A variable syntax of speech, gesture, and sound effect: Direct quotations in Spanish. Language Variation and Change, 10 (1), 43–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review, 123 (3), 324–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig (1990). Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66 (4), 764–805. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, David Quinto-Pozos, Zed Sevcikova, & Adam Schembri (2012). Lexicalisation and de-lexicalisation processes in sign languages: Comparing depicting constructions and viewpoint gestures. Language and Communication, 32 (4), 329–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, Sandra Smith, & Martine Zwets (2013). Framing constructed action in British Sign Language narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 551, 119–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, Sandra Smith, & Zed Sevcikova-Sehyr (2015). Rethinking constructed action. Sign Language and Linguistics, 18 (2), 167–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuxac, Christian (1999). The expression of spatial relations and the spatialization of semantic representations in French Sign Language. In Catherine Fuchs & Stéphane Robert (Eds.), Language diversity and cognitive representations (pp. 123–142). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark (2011). Ideophones and the aesthetics of everyday language in a west-African society. Senses & Society, 6 (1), 77–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF – Language Typology and Universals, 70 (2), 119–141.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark & Kimi Akita (2016). An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics, First view, 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dudis, Paul (2011). The body in scene depictions. In Cynthia Roy (Ed.), Discourse in signed languages (pp. 3–45). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen (2002). Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen & Brenda Falgier (1999). Talking about space with space: Describing environments in ASL. In Elizabeth Winston (Ed.), Storytelling and conversation: Discourse in deaf communities (pp. 3–26). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrara, Lindsay (2012). The grammar of depiction: Exploring gesture and language in Australian Sign Language (Auslan). Ph.D. Dissertation, Macquarie University, Sydney.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrara, Lindsay & Trevor Johnston (2014). Elaborating who’s what: A study of constructed action and clause structure in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34 (2), 193–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen & Barbara Bell (1995). Sociolinguistic variation and discourse function of constructed dialogue introducers: The case of BE+LIKE. American Speech, 70 (3), 265–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. & Jessica Robles (2010). It’s like mmm: Enactments with it’s like . Discourse Studies, 12 (6), 715–738. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuks, Orit (2014). Gradient and categorically: Handshape’s two semiotic dimensions in Israeli Sign Language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 601, 207–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson (1968). Languages of art: An approach to the theory of symbols. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 321, 1489–1522. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halvorsen, Rolf (2012). Tre diskursmarkører i norsk tegnspråk: en studie av blunk, blikkendring og nikk i åtte fortellinger [Three discourse markers in Norwegian Sign Language: A study of blinking, eyegaze, and nodding in eight narratives]. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heath, Christian (2002). Demonstrative suffering: The gestural (re)embodiment of symptoms. Journal of Communication, 521, 597–616. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodge, Gabrielle & Lindsay Ferrara (2014). Showing the story: Enactment as performance in Auslan narratives. In Lauren Gawne & Jill Vaughan (Eds.), Selected papers from the 44th Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, 2013 (pp. 372–397). Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne. Retrieved from [URL]
Holt, Elizabeth (2000). Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 33 (4), 425–454. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry (2012). Lexicalization and grammaticalization. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, & Bencie Woll (Eds.), Sign Languages: An international handbook (pp. 816–481). Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor (1992). The realization of the linguistic metafunctions in a sign language. Language Sciences, 14 (4), 317–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor & Lindsay Ferrara (2012). Lexicalization in signed languages: When an idiom is not an idiom. Selected papers from UK-CLA meetings, 11, 229–248. [URL]
Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri (1999). On defining lexeme in a signed language. Sign Language and Linguistics, 2 (2), 115–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Australian Sign Language: An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Variation, lexicalization and grammaticalization in signed languages. Langage et societé, 1311 (March), 19–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam (1972). Some relationships between body motion and speech: An analysis of an example. In Aron Wolfe Siegman & Benjamin Pope (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 177–210). New York: Pergamon Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In Mary Ritchie Key (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207–227). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Exploring the utterance roles of visible bodily action: A personal account. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Sedinha Tessendorf (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication (Vol. 11, pp. 7–28). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Semiotic diversity in utterance production and the concept of ‘language’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 3691, 20130293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Gesture and sign: Utterance uses of visible bodily action. In Keith Allan (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistics (pp. 33–46). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilian-Hatz, Christa (2001). Universality and diversity: Ideophones from Baka and Kxoe. In Erhard Friedrich Karl Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (Eds.), Ideophones (pp. 155–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kosslyn, Stephen M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kunene, Daniel P. (2001). Speaking the act: The ideophone as a linguistic rebel. In Erhard Friedrich Karl Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (Eds.), Ideophones (pp. 183–191). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. (2001). Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12 (2), 143–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. & Melanie Metzger (1998). Gesture in sign language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 301, 657–697. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mather, Sue & Elizabeth Winston (1998). Spatial mapping and involvement in ASL storytelling. In Ceil Lucas (Ed.), Pinky extension and eye gaze: Language use in deaf communities (pp. 183–210). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mathis, Terrie & George Yule (1994). Zero quotatives. Discourse Processes, 18 (1), 63–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayer, Mercer (1969). Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, David (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Metzger, Melanie (1995). Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. In Ceil Lucas (Ed.), Sociolinguistics in deaf communities (pp. 255–271). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perniss, Pamela (2007). Achieving spatial coherence in German Sign Language narratives: The use of classifiers and perspective. Lingua, 117 (7), 1315–1338. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quinto-Pozos, David (2007). Can constructed action be considered obligatory. Lingua, 117 (7), 1285–1314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quinto-Pozos, David & Sarika Mehta (2010). Register variation in mimetic gestural complements to signed language. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (3), 557–584. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sams, Jessie (2010). Quoting the unspoken: An analysis of quotations in spoken discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 421, 3147–3160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin (2006). Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam, Caroline Jones, & Denis Burnham (2005). Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: Evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners’ gestures without speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10 (3), 272–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack (2006). Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 39 (4), 377–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted (2003). Revisiting visual analogy in ASL classifier predicates. In Karen Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp. 249–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taub, Sarah (2001). Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tervoort, Bernard Th. (1973). Could there be a human sign language? Semiotica, 91, 347–382.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Washabaugh, William (1981). Sign language in its social context. Annual Review of Anthropology, 101, 237–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman (2004a). Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning, and gesture in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics, 15 (2), 119–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Routes from gesture to language. In Elena Pizzuto, Paola Pietrandrea, & Raffaele Simone (Eds.), Verbal and signed languages: Comparing structures, constructs and methodologies (pp. 107–131). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike (2003). ‘Classificatory’ constructions in Indo-Pakistani Sign Language: Grammaticalization and lexicalization processes. In Karen Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp. 113–141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (28)

Cited by 28 other publications

Bø, Vibeke
2025. Constructed dialogue in signed-to-spoken interpreting: renditions as a reconfiguration of utterance semiotics. Semiotica DOI logo
Matende, Tawanda & Crous Hlungwani
2025. Toward a Theory for Understanding Morphosyntactic Structures in Sign Language: A Proposal of the Integrative Cognitive Functional Theory. Journal of Asian and African Studies DOI logo
Pleyer, Michael, Marcus Perlman, Gary Lupyan, Koen de Reus & Limor Raviv
2025. The ‘design features’ of language revisited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences DOI logo
Zorzi, Giorgia, Gro Hege Saltnes Urdal & Eli Raanes
2025. Understanding depiction in tactile Norwegian sign language interpreting. Lingua 316 ► pp. 103887 ff. DOI logo
Kendon, Adam
2024. Contributions to the Study of Visible Action as Utterance: A Fifty-Year Retrospective. In The Cambridge Handbook of Gesture Studies, ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Napoli, Donna Jo & Nathan Sanders
2024. An approach to path movement in the diachronic study of sign languages. Diachronica DOI logo
Kurz, Kim B., Geo Kartheiser & Peter C. Hauser
2023. Second language learning of depiction in a different modality: The case of sign language acquisition. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Beukeleers, Inez & Myriam Vermeerbergen
2022. Show Me What You’ve B/Seen: A Brief History of Depiction. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Capirci, Olga, Chiara Bonsignori & Alessio Di Renzo
2022. Signed Languages: A Triangular Semiotic Dimension. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Hodge, Gabrielle & Lindsay Ferrara
2022. Iconicity as Multimodal, Polysemiotic, and Plurifunctional. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Meurant, Laurence
2022. Put another way. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 36 ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Vandenitte, Sébastien
2022. Showing where you stand. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 36 ► pp. 46 ff. DOI logo
Vandenitte, Sébastien
2023. When referents are seen and heard. In Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series, 228], ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Hsu, Hui-Chieh, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts
2021. When Gesture “Takes Over”: Speech-Embedded Nonverbal Depictions in Multimodal Interaction. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Lutzenberger, Hannah, Connie de Vos, Onno Crasborn & Paula Fikkert
2021. Formal variation in the Kata Kolok lexicon. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1 DOI logo
Manhardt, Francie, Susanne Brouwer & Aslı Özyürek
2021. A Tale of Two Modalities: Sign and Speech Influence Each Other in Bimodal Bilinguals. Psychological Science 32:3 ► pp. 424 ff. DOI logo
McKee, Rachel, Josefina Safar & Sara Pivac Alexander
2021. Form, frequency and sociolinguistic variation in depicting signs in New Zealand Sign Language. Language & Communication 79 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Omardeen, Rehana, Kate Mesh & Markus Steinbach
2021. Initial person reference in Providence Island Sign Language. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1 DOI logo
SLONIMSKA, ANITA, ASLI ÖZYÜREK & OLGA CAPIRCI
2021. Using depiction for efficient communication in LIS (Italian Sign Language). Language and Cognition 13:3 ► pp. 367 ff. DOI logo
Tomasuolo, Elena, Chiara Bonsignori, Pasquale Rinaldi & Virginia Volterra
2020. The representation of action in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Cognitive Linguistics 31:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Dingemanse, Mark
2019. ‘Ideophone’ as a comparative concept. In Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 16], ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Ferrara, Lindsay & Torill Ringsø
2019. Spatial Vantage Points in Norwegian Sign Language. Open Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 583 ff. DOI logo
Gawne, Lauren, Chelsea Krajcik, Helene N. Andreassen, Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker & Barbara F. Kelly
2019. Data transparency and citation in the journal Gesture . Gesture 18:1 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Hodge, Gabrielle & Kearsy Cormier
2019. Reported speech as enactment. Linguistic Typology 23:1 ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Puupponen, Anna
2019. Towards understanding nonmanuality: A semiotic treatment of signers’ head movements. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 DOI logo
Ferrara, Lindsay & Gabrielle Hodge
2018. Language as Description, Indication, and Depiction. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo
Rinaldi, Pasquale, Maria Cristina Caselli, Tommaso Lucioli, Luca Lamano & Virginia Volterra
2018. Sign Language Skills Assessed Through a Sentence Reproduction Task. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 23:4 ► pp. 408 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Italian Sign Language from a Cognitive and Socio-semiotic Perspective [Gesture Studies, 9], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue