In:Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language
Edited by Annalisa Baicchi
[Figurative Thought and Language 9] 2020
► pp. 129–150
Metaphorical adjective-noun phrases in German journalese
Published online: 12 August 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.9.06dek
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.9.06dek
Abstract
The study explores metaphorical adjective-noun
phrases (ANPs) and describes the semantics behind the polysemous
structure of ANPs. The data for the research have been collected in
German newspapers. The whole ANP-construction provides an overall
figurative frame and tends to influence the metaphorical use of the
adjective in that construction. As the study shows the same
syntactic structure can refer to different metaphorical or literal
predications. The role of the context is also discussed as well as
the nature of the adjective in the ANP.
Keywords: nominal phrase, metaphorical, adjective-noun, journalese, German
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Former research on metaphorical adjective-noun phrases
- 3.A cognitive linguistics framework for the exploration of ANPs
- 4.A semantic and conceptual study of metaphorical ANPs
- 4.1Adjective [literal] + noun [metaphorical]
- 4.2Adjective [metaphorical] + noun [literal]
- 4.3Adjective + noun [metaphorical]
- 4.4Contextual information with pictures
- 5.The nature of domain adjectives
- 6.Conclusions
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (33)
Aarts, J. M. G. and J. P. Calbert. (1979). Metaphor
and Non-Metaphor. The Semantics of Adjective-Noun
Combinations. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Coulson, S. (2006). Semantic
Leaps: Frame-shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning
Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, W. (2003). The
role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and
metonymies. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor
and Metonymy in comparison and
contrast, 161–206. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
De Knop, S. (2015). Causal
constructions with an adjective in German and French:
typological and pedagogical
considerations. Special
issue of Journal of Social Sciences
on “Phraseodidactics and Construction
Grammar(s)”, edited
by M. I. Gonzalez Rey, 11(3): 289–303.
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. (1996). Blending
as a central process of
grammar”. In A. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual
Structure and
Discourse, 113–131. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame
Semantics. In The
Linguistic Society of
Korea (Ed.), Linguistics
in the Morning
Calm, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.
Fries, C. C. (1952). The
Structure of English. An Introduction to the Construction of
English
Sentences. London: Longmans, Green and Company.
Gaeta, L. & B. Schlücker. (2012). Das
Deutsche als kompositionsfreudige Sprache: Strukturelle
Eigenschaften und systembezogene
Aspekte. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Geckeler, H. (1971). Zur
Wortfelddiskussion: Untersuchungen zur Gliederung des
Wortfeldes ‘alt-jung-neu’ im heutigen
Französisch. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
Grady, J. E. (1997). Foundations
of meaning: primary metaphors and primary
scenes. Ph.D.
Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Hinrichs, U. (2004). Vorbemerkungen
zum analytischen Sprachtyp in
Europa. In Hinrichs, U. & U. Büttner, (Eds.), Die
europäischen Sprachen auf dem Wege zum analytischen
Sprachtyp, 169–196. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Kalik, A. (1967). L’expression
des rapports de déterminé à déterminant (adjectifs de
relation). Le Français
Moderne 35: 270–285.
Kniffka, H. (1980). Soziolinguistik
und empirische Textanalyse: Schlagzeilen- und
Leadformulierung in amerikanischen
Tageszeitungen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations
of Cognitive
Grammar. Volume 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Neubauer, F. (1977). Aspekte
der Klassifikation von
Adjektiven. In K. Heger and J. S. Petöfi (eds.), Kasustheorie,
Klassifikation, semantische Interpretation: Beiträge zur
Lexikologie und
Semantik, 231–260. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
Pérez Sobrino, P. (2015). Expanding
the figurative continuum to multimodal settings: Patterns of
interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in
advertising. Ph.D.
dissertation, Logrono: University of La Rioja.
Primus, B. (1997). Der
Wortgruppenaufbau in der Geschichte des Deutschen: Zur
Präzisierung von synthetisch vs.
analytisch. Sprachwissenschaft 22: 133–159.
Schmid, J. (2012). Metapher. [URL]
Strohner, H. and G. Stoet. (1999). Cognitive
compositionality: An activation and evaluation
hypothesis. In M. K. Hiraga, C. Sinha and S. Wilcox (eds.), Cultural,
Psychological and Typological Issues in Cognitive
Linguistics, 195–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sullivan, K. (2013). Frames
and Constructions in Metaphoric
Language. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sweetser, E. (1999). Compositionality
and blending: semantic composition in a cognitively
realistic
framework. In T. Janssen & G. Redeker (Eds.), Cognitive
Linguistics: Foundations, Scope and
Methodology, 129–162. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tribushinina, E. (2011). Reference
points in adjective-noun conceptual integration
networks. In S. Handl and H.-J. Schmid (eds.), Windows
to the Mind: Metaphor, Metonymy and Conceptual
Blending, 269–290. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
