Cover not available

In:Relevance Theory, Figuration, and Continuity in Pragmatics
Edited by Agnieszka Piskorska
[Figurative Thought and Language 8] 2020
► pp. 327–350

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 12
Humour and irony in George Mikes’ How to be a Brit

 | University of Zaragoza, Spain
Published online: 20 May 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.8.12cas
Abstract
Within relevance theory, and contrarily to classical formalist models, it is claimed that figurative language does not require any special processing route, other than the steps followed in the addressee’s inferential recognition of the speaker’s communicative intention made manifest through the message encoded in a certain context. The present paper sets out to analyse humour and irony as used by Mikes in How to be a Brit as manifestations of figurative language following a relevance-theoretic approach. It will be shown that the inferential steps followed by the addressee in coping with the message communicated by the speaker with different degrees of strength can be exploited for the expression of irony and humour.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretic framework
  • 3.Analysis: Strategies and purposes for the conveyance of irony and humour in George Mikes’ How to be a Brit
    • 3.1The prefaces
    • 3.2A relevance-theoretic analysis of humour and irony in George Mikes’ How to be a Brit
      • a.Resolution of ambiguities or disambiguation
      • b.Reference assignment
      • c.Enrichment or filling of a semantic gap
      • d.Derivation of implicatures
      • e.Irony and humour resulting from a contradiction of expectations
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (67)
References
Attardo, S. (2000). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32.6, 793–826. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001a). Humorous texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001b). Humor and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure of detection. In L. Anolli, R. Ciceri, & G. Riva (Eds.), Say not Say: New perspectives on miscommunication (pp.165–185). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Intentionality and irony. In L. Ruiz Gurillo & B. Alvarado Ortega (Eds.), Irony and humor. From pragmatics to discourse (pp. 39–57). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. (1991). Script theory revisited: joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor, 4.3–4, 293–347.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biegajlo, M. (2014). From which position should I get this joke?! A relevance-driven joke interpretation: Naive optimism, cautious optimism, sophisticated understanding. International Studies in Humour, 3(1), 2–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, D. (1992). Understanding Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booth, W. (1974). A rhetoric of irony. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, R. (1980). Approaches to verbal irony (MA Thesis). London: University College.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Relevance-theoretic pragmatics and modularity. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 9: 29-53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1981). Irony and parody and the use-mention distinction. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 10, 24–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002a). Thoughts and utterances. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002b). Metaphor, ad hoc concepts and word meaning – More questions than answers. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14, 83–105.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, R. & Uchida, S. (Eds.) (1998). Relevance Theory. Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, B. (2013). Relevance theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curcó, C. (1995). Some observations on the pragmatics of humorous interpretations. A relevance-theoretic approach. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7, 27–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). The implicit expression of attitudes, mutual manifestness and verbal humour. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 89–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997a). The Pragmatics of Humorous Interpretations: A Relevance-Theoretic Account. Unpublished PhD. Dissertation. University College London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997b). Relevance and the manipulation of the incongruous: Some explorations of verbal humour. In M. Groefsema (Ed.), Proceedings of the University of Hertfordshire relevance theory workshop (pp. 68–72). Chelmford: Peter Thomas and Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Indirect echoes and verbal humour. In V. Rouchota, & A. H. Jucker (Eds.), Current issues in relevance theory (pp. 304–325). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Furlong, A. (1996). Relevance theory and literary interpretation. PhD. Thesis. University of London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of the mind: Figurative language, thought and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 317–333. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Irony as persuasive communication. In H. L. Colston, & A. N. Katz (Eds.), Figurative Language Comprehension. Social and Cultural Influences (pp.131–151). Mahwah: L.E.A.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2002). The risks and rewards of ironic communication. In L. Anolli, R. Ciceri, & G. Riva, Say not to Say: New Perspectives on Miscommunication (pp. 181–194). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatim, B. (1997). Communication across cultures. Translation theory and contrastive text linguistics. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jodłowiec, M. (1991). What makes jokes tick. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 241–253.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mikes, G. (1986 [1946–1977]). How to be a Brit. A George Mikes minibus. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muecke, D. C. (1969). The Compass of irony. London: Methuen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1970). Irony. London: Methuen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1982). Irony and the ironic. London: Methuen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pilkington, A. (2000). Poetic effects. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piskorska, A. (2014). A relevance-theoretic perspective on humorous irony and its failure. Humor 274, 661–685.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Echo and inadequacy in ironic utterances. Journal of Pragmatics 101, 54–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez R. S. (2013). “The power of inversion. Irony, from utterance to discourse.” In L. Ruiz Gurillo, & B. Alvarado Ortega (Eds.), Irony and humour. From pragmatics to discourse (pp. 17–38). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, L., & B. Alvarado Ortega (Eds.) (2013). Irony and Humour. From pragmatics to discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture. A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Claidière, N. (2006). Defining and explaining culture. (comments on Richerson and Boyd Not by genes alone). Reading available at Cultural Evolution Workshop. Washington University in St. Louis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1978). Les ironies comme mentions. Poétique, 36, 399–412.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 295–318). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Relevance. Communication and cognition, 2nd ed. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres S. (1999). Estudio pragmático del humor verbal. M.A. thesis. Cadiz: University of Cadiz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (1999). Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 11, 127–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua, 116, 1722–1743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Irony and metarepresentation. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 21, 183–226.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Relevance theory and the interpretation of literary works. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 23, 69–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 40–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In L. R. Horn, & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Explaining irony. In D. Wilson, & D. Sperber Meaning and relevance (pp. 123–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yus, F. 1995–96. La teoría de la relevancia y la estrategia humorística de la incongruencia-resolución. Pragmalingüística, 3–4, 497–508.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997–98). Irony: context accessibility and processing effort. Pragmalingüística, 5–6, 391–410.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999b). Towards a pragmatic taxonomy of misunderstandings. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 38, 217–239.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). On reaching the intended ironic interpretation. International Journal of Communication, 10 (1–2), 27–78.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000–01). Literal/ non-literal and the processing of verbal irony. Pragmalingüística, 8–9, 349–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Humor and the search for relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 359, 1295–1331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Pragmatics of humorous strategies in El club de la comedia. In R. Márquez-Reiter, & M. E. Placencia (Eds.), Current trends in the pragmatics of Spanish (pp. 320–344). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Saturación contextual en la comprensión de la ironía. In L. Ruiz Gurillo, & X. Padilla García (Eds.), Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres. Una aproximación pragmática a la ironía (pp. 309–331). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). An inference-centered analysis of jokes. The intersecting circles model of humorous communication. In L. Ruiz Gurillo, & B. Alvarado Ortega (Eds.), Irony and humor. From pragmatics to discourse (pp. 59–82). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016a). Humour and relevance. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016b). Relevance theory and contextual sources-centred analysis of irony. Current research and compatibility. In M. Padilla Cruz (Ed.), Relevance theory: Recent developments, current challenges and future directions (pp. 147–171). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016d). Incongruity-resolution and the explicit-implicated-implied interface. Paper delivered at Linguistic Approaches to Funniness, Amusement and Laughter. 4th International Symposium: Theoretical Issues in Humour, Building Bridges across Disciplines. University of Lodz (Poland), March.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017a). Relevance-theoretic treatments of humor. In S. Attardo (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 189–203). Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017b). Incongruity-resolution cases in jokes. Lingua, 197, 103–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Attaching feelings and emotions to propositions. Some insights on irony and Internet communication. Russian Journal of Linguistics 22(1), 94–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue