Cover not available

In:Performing Metaphoric Creativity across Modes and Contexts
Edited by Laura Hidalgo-Downing and Blanca Kraljevic Mujic
[Figurative Thought and Language 7] 2020
► pp. 281–310

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 12
“Born from the heart”

Social uses of pictorial and multimodal metaphors in picture books on adoption

 | Universidad de Granada
Published online: 29 May 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.7.12cal
Abstract
This paper explores the adoption narratives that run across a selection of children’s picture books and how they are built through the creative integration of linguistic and pictorial patterns, specifically as depicted in metaphors. The main aim is thus to uncover the way in which adoption is shaped and portrayed in these books, challenging constrictive and learnt discourses in society. The project draws on the four pictorial categories identified in Forceville (1996): contextual or MP1, hybrid or MP2, simile, and verbo-pictorial, as well as the concept of multimodal metaphor (Forceville and Urios-Aparisi, 2009) already suggested in the verbo-pictorial category. These narratives create an accessible space for children to delineate their understanding of families and construct their own identity.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Standpoint
  • Sample of texts
  • Case studies of each subtype of pictorial metaphor
    • 1.The Contextual Metaphor: A “collage” of good memories and bonds
      • 1.1Settling in a new home
      • 1.2The affective and physical bond
    • 2.Hybrid relations: Physical resemblance does not equal parenthood
    • 3.Simile-type relations: A celebration of the self and affection
    • 4.Verbo-pictorial metaphor: Born from the heart
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (48)
References
Primary sources
Höjer, D. (2001). [L. Höjer, illustrator; Rabén & Sjögren Bokförlag, translator]. Heart of mine. A story of adoption. London: R&S. [Translated from 2000, Hjärtat mitt. Stockholm: Rabén & Sjögren Bokförlag].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasza, K. (1992). A mother for Choco. Hemel Hempstead: Simon & Schuster. Young Books [1982, Japan: Saera Shobo; 1992, USA: Putnam’s Sons].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kimpton, D. (2006). [R. Beardshaw, illustrator]. The Lamb-a-roo. London: Gullane Children’s Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. (2007). What’s in your tummy mummy? London: Anova Children’s.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sansone, A. (1999). [A. Marks; J. Alison James, translator]. The Little Green Goose. Great Britain: North-South Books. [Translated from 1999, Das Grüne Küken, Gossau Zürich: Nord-Süd Verlag AG]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seeney, J. (2012). [R. Fuller, illustrator]. A Safe place for Rufus. London: British Association for Adoption and Fostering.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serrano, B. (2013). [R. Serrano, illustrator]. Born from the heart. Madrid: Kókinos [Published in 2016 in Spanish under the title Nacido del corazón].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Secondary sources
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calvo-Maturana, C. (2012). Maternidad y voces poéticas en “The Adoption Papers” de Jackie Kay: Un estudio de estilística de corpus [Motherhood and poetic voices in ‘The Adoption Papers’ by Jackie Kay: A corpus stylistics study]. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Universidad de Granada, España.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(forthcoming). Re-shaping adoption in children’s picture books: a corpus stylistics analysis [presented at AESLA conference, 19th-21st April 2018, Universidad de Cádiz].
Downing, A., & Locke, P. [1992] (2006). English grammar: A university course (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, C. (1994). Pictorial metaphor in advertisements. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9 (1), 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Compasses, beauty queens and other PCs: Pictorial metaphors in computer advertisements. Hermes, Journal of Linguistics, 24, 31–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: current applications and future perspectives (pp. 379–402). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Multimodal Metaphor in Ten Dutch TV Commercials. Public Journal of Semiotics 1: 19–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008a). Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 462–482). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008b). Pictorial and multimodal metaphor in commercials. In E. F. McQuarrie, & B. J. Phillips (Eds.), Go figure! New directions in advertising rhetoric (pp. 178–203). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Pictorial and multimodal metaphor. In N. M. Klug, & H. Stöckl (Eds.), Handbook of language in multimodal contexts. linguistic knowledge series (pp. 241–260). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Visual and multimodal metaphor in advertising: Cultural perspectives. Styles of Communication, 9 (2), 26–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios Aparisi, E. (Eds.). (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. (2001). Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 16 (3/4): 223–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1994). Poetics of mind: figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hidalgo Downing, L. (2015). Metaphor and metonymy. In R. Jones (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 107–128). Oxford: Taylor Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hidalgo Downing, L., Martínez, M. A., & Kraljevic-Mujic, B. (2016). Multimodal metaphor, narrativity, and creativity in TV cosmetics ads. In M. Romano, & M. D. Porto (Eds.), Exploring discourse strategies in social and cognitive interaction: Multimodal and cross-linguistic perspectives (pp. 137–158). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeffries, L., & McIntyre, D. (2010). Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jerome, K. & Sweeney, K. A. (2014). Birth parents’ portrayals in children’s adoption literature. Journal of Family Issues, 35 (5), 677–704. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2010). Creativity and discourse. World Englishes, 29 (4), 467–480. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, G. R. & Leeuwen, T. V. (2006) [1996]. Reading images: the grammar of visual design. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. N., & Short, M. (1981). Style in Fiction. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Louw, B. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? – the diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and Technology: in honour of John Sinclair (pp. 157–176). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moder, C. L. (2008). It’s like making a soup: Metaphors and similes in spoken news discourse. In Language in the context of use: Discourse and cognitive approaches to language (pp. 301–320). Berlín: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nørgaard, N. (2014). Multimodality and Stylistics. In M. Burke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 471–482). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quereda Rodríguez-Navarro, L. (1997). A morphosyntactic study of the English verb phrase. Granada: Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rees, J. (2009). Life story books for adopted children: A family friendly approach. London: Athenaeum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero, E. & Soria, B. (2014). Relevance Theory and Metaphor. Linguagem em (Dis)curso, 14 (3), 489–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E., & Short, M. (2004). Corpus stylistics: Speech, writing and thought presentation in a corpus of English writing. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Short, M. (1996). Exploring the language of poems, plays and prose. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. [1986] (1995). Relevance, communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quiroz, P. A. (2008). From Race Matching to Transracial adoption: race and the changing discourse of US adoption. Critical Discourse Studies, 5:3, 249–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Rompay, T. (2005). Expressions: Embodiment in the Experience of Design. PhD thesis, Technical University Delft, The Netherlands.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Other links
Adichi, C. (2009). The danger of a single story. Retrieved from [URL]
Forceville, C. (2007). A Course in Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphors. The Semiotic Institute Online. Retrieved from [URL]
Ted Talk (n.d.). Ideas worth spreading. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Forceville, Charles
2020. Visual and Multimodal Communication, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue