In:Performing Metaphoric Creativity across Modes and Contexts
Edited by Laura Hidalgo-Downing and Blanca Kraljevic Mujic
[Figurative Thought and Language 7] 2020
► pp. 153–173
Chapter 7Metaphorical creativity in political cartoons
The migrant crisis in Europe
Published online: 29 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.7.07mar
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.7.07mar
Abstract
This paper aims to explore the discursive construction of political meaning in cartoons on the present migrant crisis in Europe, and the potential of cartoon discourse for creativity in the use of metaphor and blending. Metaphors, blends and cultural models interact in the representation of events and social actors in cartoons, and the resulting synergistic effect may create meanings which both reflect and reinforce or reshape public opinion (Bergen, 2004; Marín-Arrese, 2008; Forceville, 2009; Schilperoord & Maes, 2009). From a Cognitive Linguistic approach to Critical Discourse Analysis (Charteris-Black, 2006; Hart, 2010; Musolff 2012a), the paper focuses on the use of metaphors and other cognitive mechanisms, and the ways in which political cartoons provide the ideal site for metaphorical creativity as recontextualization (Hidalgo Downing & Kraljevic Mujic, 2013).
Keywords: metaphor, blending, cultural models, creativity, recontextualization, political cartoons
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Metaphor and creativity in political cartooning
- 2.1Humor in political cartooning
- 2.2Cognitive mechanisms in cartoons
- 2.3Creativity in political cartooning
- 3.The migrant crisis in Europe: Some facts
- 4.Methodology
- 4.1Case studies: Data sources and data collection
- 4.2Hypotheses and research objectives
- 4.3Research design: Procedure
- 5.Results and discussion
- 5.1Metaphor in cartoons and in the language of politics and the media
- 5.2Creativity in cartoons
- 6.Conclusions
References
References (43)
Bergen, B. (2004). To awaken a sleeping giant. Cognition and culture in September 11 political cartoons. In M. Achard, & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture and mind (pp. 23–35). Standford, CA: CSLI.
Bergen, B. & Binsted, K. (2004). The cognitive linguistics of scalar humor. In M. Achard, & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture and mind (pp. 79–92). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Brône, G., & Feyaerts, K. (2003). The cognitive linguistics of incongruity resolution: Marked reference-point structures in humor. Paper presented at the 8th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Logroño, 20–25 July 2003. (Preprint n. 205). University of Leuven: Department of Linguistics.
Charteris-Black, J. (2006). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society, 17 (5), 563–81.
Chilton, P. (2005). Missing links in mainstream CDA: Modules, blends and the critical instinct. In R. Wodak, & P. Chilton (Eds), A new research agenda in critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity (pp. 19–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Coleridge, S.T. (1817) Biographia literaria. Chapter XIV. <eBook at: [URL]>
Forceville, C. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville, & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor. (pp. 19–42). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ginman, M. & von Ungern-Sternberg, S. (2003). Cartoons as information. Journal of Information Science, 29, 69–77.
Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8 (3), 183–206.
Greenberg, J. (2002). Framing and temporality in political cartoons: A critical analysis of visual news discourse. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 39 (2), 181–198.
Gruner, C. R. (1997). The game of humour. A comprehensive theory of why we laugh. New Jersey: Transaction.
Hart, C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hidalgo Downing, L. & Kraljevic Mujic, B. (2013). Introduction: Special issue on metaphorical creativity across modes. Metaphor and the Social World, 3 (2), 133–139.
Hidalgo Downing, L., Kraljevic Mujic, B., & Núñez Perucha, B. (2013). Metaphorical creativity and recontextualisation in multimodal advertisements on e-business across time. Metaphor in the Social World, 13(2), 199–219.
Holland, D., & Quinn, N. (Eds.). (1987). Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KhosraviNik, M. (2010). The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Politics, 9 (1), 1–28.
Koestler, A. ([1964] 1989). The act of creation. [London: Hutchinson] London: Arkana, Penguin Books.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2010). A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 21, 663–697.
Kyratzis, S. (2003). Laughing metaphorically: Metaphor and humour in discourse. Paper presented at the 8th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 20–25 July 2003. Logroño: Universidad de La Rioja.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (2005). Humour as subversion in political cartooning. In M. Labarta Postigo (Ed.), Approaches to critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–22). Valencia: Universitat de València, Servei de Publicacions. CD.
(2015). Political cartoon discourse. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel (Eds.). The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction. Boston: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
McGraw, P. & Warren, C. (2010). Benign violations: Making immoral behavior funny. Psychological Science, 21, 1141–1149.
Musolff, A. (2012a). The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 9 (3), 301–310.
(2012b). Immigrants and parasites: The history of a bio-social metaphor. In M. Messer, R. Schroeder, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Migrations: Interdisciplinary perspectives, (pp. 249–258). Vienna: Springer.
(2015). Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3 (1), 41–56.
Nilsen, D. L. F., & Nilsen, A. P. (Eds.) (1983). The language of humour and the humour oflanguage. Proceedings of the 1982 WHIM Conference. 1983 WHIMSY, Western Humor and Irony Membership Serial Yearbook. Tempe, Arizona: Arizona State University Press.
Schilperoord, J. & Maes, A. (2009). Visual metaphoric conceptualization in editorial cartoons. In C. Forceville, & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor, (pp. 213–240). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Semino, E., Deignan, A., & Littlemore, J. (2013). Metaphor, genre and recontextualization. Metaphor and Symbol, 28 (1), 41–59.
Suls, J. M. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information-processing analysis. In J. H. Goldstein, & P. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor (pp. 81–100). New York: Academic Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Assimakopoulos, Stavros & Anna Piata
2024. Liquid racism, metaphor and the visual modality. In Exploring the Ambivalence of Liquid Racism [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 341], ► pp. 118 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
