In:Performing Metaphoric Creativity across Modes and Contexts
Edited by Laura Hidalgo-Downing and Blanca Kraljevic Mujic
[Figurative Thought and Language 7] 2020
► pp. 1–18
Chapter 1Introduction
Towards an integrated framework for the analysis of metaphor and creativity in discourse
Published online: 29 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.7.01hid
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.7.01hid
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Approaching metaphor and creativity as product and process
- 3.Dimensions of creativity
- 4.Performance in understanding metaphoric creativity
- 5.Multimodality and problem solving in metaphoric creativity
- 6.About this book
References
References (33)
Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (Eds). (2010). Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. Studies in Applied Linguistics. London: Equinox.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper/Collins.
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1994). The poetics of mind. Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2017b). The embodied and discourse views of metaphor: why these are not so different and how they can be brought closer together. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor. Embodied cognition and discourse. (pp. 319–334). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. & Cameron, L. (2008). The social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1–2), 64–75.
Hampe, B. (Ed.) (2017). Metaphor. Embodied cognition and discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hidalgo Downing, L. (2015). Metaphor and metonymy. In R. Jones (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 107–128). Abingdon: Routledge.
Hidalgo Downing, L. & Kraljevic Mujic, B. (Eds.) (2011). Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as discourse resources for creativity in ads. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9(1), 153–178.
(2013). Introduction. In L. Hidalgo Downing & B. Kraljevic Mujic (Eds.) Metaphor in the social world. Special issue on ‘Metaphorical creativity across modes’. 13(2), 133–139.
Jensen, T. W. & Cuffari, E. (2014). Doubleness in experience: Toward a distributed, enacted approach to metaphoricity. Metaphor and Symbol, 29(4), 278–297.
Jensen, T. W. & Greve, L. (2019). Ecological Cognition and Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(1), 1–16.
(Ed.). (2016). Creativity and discourse analysis. In R. Jones (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and creativity. (pp. 61–77). Abingdon: Routledge.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 21(10), 663–697.
(2015). Where metaphors come from. Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the Creative Process: Past, Present and Future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 295–308.
Lubart, T., & Getz, I. (1997). Emotion, Metaphor, and the Creative Process. Creativity Research Journal. 10(4), 285–301.
Maybin, J. (2016). Everyday language creativity. In R. Jones (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and creativity. (pp. 25–39). Abingdon: Routledge.
Semino, E., Deignan, A. & Littlemore, J. (2013). Metaphor, genre and recontextualization, Metaphor and Symbol, 28(1), 41–59.
Semino, E., & Demjén, Z. (Eds.). (2016). The Routledge handbook of language and metaphor. London: Routledge.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swann, J., & Maybin, J. (Eds.). (2007). Applied Linguistics. Special Issue: Language Creativity in Everyday Contexts. 28(4).
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Türker, Ebru & Jae Hyun Park
Foley, Jennifer & Laura Hidalgo-Downing
O’Dowd, Niamh A
Tseng, Ming-Yu
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura & Niamh A. O’Dowd
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura & Paula Pérez-Sobrino
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
