Cover not available

In:How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science
Edited by Anke Beger and Thomas H. Smith
[Figurative Thought and Language 6] 2020
► pp. 73110

References (63)
References
Amin, T. G. (2001). A cognitive linguistics approach to the layperson’s understanding of thermal phenomena. In A. Cenki, B. Luka, & M. Smith (Eds.), Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistic structure (pp.27–44). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Conceptual metaphor meets conceptual change. Human Development, 52(3), 165–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Conceptual metaphor and the study of conceptual change: Research synthesis and future directions. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5–6), 966–991. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amin, T. G., Jeppsson, F., Haglund, J. (2015). Conceptual metaphor and embodied cognition in science learning (Special Issue). International Journal of Science Education, 37(5–6), 745–991. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amin, T. G., Jeppsson, F., Haglund, J. & Strömdahl, H. (2012). Arrow of time: Metaphorical construals of entropy and the second law of thermodynamics. Science Education, 95(5), 818–848. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amin, T. G. & Levrini, O. (2018). Converging perspectives on conceptual change: Mapping an emerging paradigm in the learning sciences. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amin, T. G., Smith, C., & Wiser, M. (2014). Student conceptions and conceptual change: Three overlapping phases of research. In N. Lederman and S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Science Education, Vol II (pp.57–82). UK: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aubusson, P. J., Harrison, A. G., & Ritchie, S. M. (2006). Metaphor and analogy in science education. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bailer-Jones, D. M. (2002). Models, metaphors and analogies. In P. Machamer & M. Silberstein (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of science (pp.108–128). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowley, R., & Sánchez, M. (1999). Introductory statistical mechanics (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brewe, E. (2011). Energy as a substance-like quantity that flows: Theoretical considerations and pedagogical consequences. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 7(2), 1–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brookes, D. T. (2006). The role of language in learning physics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers). The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brookes, D. T., & Etkina, E. (2015). The importance of language in students’ reasoning about heat in thermodynamics processes. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5–6), 759–779. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clement, J. (2009). Creative model construction in scientists and students: The role imagery, analogy, and mental simulation. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Close, H. & Scherr, R. (2015). Enacting conceptual metaphor through blending: Learning activities embodying the substance metaphor for energy. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5–6), 839–866. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dreyfus, B. W., Geller, B. D., Gouvea, J., Sawtelle, V., Turpen, C., & Redish, E. F. (2014). Ontological metaphors for negative energy in an interdisciplinary context, Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 10, 020108.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dreyfus, B. W., Gupta, A., & Redish, J. (2015). Applying conceptual blending to model coordinated use of multiple ontological metaphors. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5–6), 812–838. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duit, R. (1987). Should energy be illustrated as something quasi-material? International Journal of Science Education, 9, 139–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649–672. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, J. St. B.  T. (2003). In two minds: Dual process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 454–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., & Sands, M. (1963). The Feynman lectures on physics (Vol. 1–3). Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1996). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gee, J. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses, 2nd Edition . London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp.199–242). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Gentner, D. R. (1983). Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp.99–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Jeziorski, M. (1993). The shift from metaphor to analogy in Western science. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp.447–480). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D. & Wolff, P. (2000). Metaphor and knowledge change. In E. Dietrich & A. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual change in humans and machines (pp.295–342). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2008). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S. & Keysar, B. (1993). How metaphors work. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd Edition (pp.401–424). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gupta, A., Hammer, D., & Redish, E. F. (2010). The case for dynamic models of learners’ ontologies in physics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 285–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hallyn, F. (2000) Metaphor and analogy in the sciences. New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haglund, J., Jeppsson, F., & Anderson, J. (2014). Primary school children’s ideas of mixing and of heat as expressed in a classroom setting. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(5), 726–739. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeppsson, F., Haglund, J., & Amin, T. (2015). Varying use of conceptual metaphor across levels of expertise. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5–6), 780–805. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeppsson, F., Haglund, J. Amin, T. G., & Strömdahl, H. (2013). Exploring the use of conceptual metaphor in solving problems on entropy. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 22(1), 70–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd edition). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambert, F. L. (2002). Disorder – A cracked crutch for supporting entropy discussions. Journal of Chemical Education, 79(2), 187–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lancor, R. A. (2013). The many metaphors of energy: Using analogies as a formative assessment tool. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(3), 38–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Using metaphor theory to examine conceptions of energy in biology, chemistry, and physics. Science & Education, 23(6), 1245–1267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). An analysis of metaphors used by students to describe energy in an interdisciplinary general science course. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5–6), 876–902. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leff, H. S. (2007). Entropy, its language and interpretation. Foundations of Physics, 37(12), 1744–1766. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Creating scientific concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortony, A. (1993), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed. ). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scherr, R. E., Close, H. G., Close, E. W., Flood, V. J., McKagan, S. B., Robertson, A. D., & Vokos, S. (2013). Negotiating energy dynamics through embodied action in a materially structured environment. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 9(2), 020105.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scherr, R R. E., Close, H. G., Close, E. W., & Vokos, S. (2012). Representing energy II Energy tracking representations. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 8(2), 1–11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scherr, R. E., Close, H. G., McKagan, S. B., & Vokos, S. (2012). Representing energy I: Representing a substance ontology for energy. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 8(2), 020114.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinatra, G. M. & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, C. (2018). Conceptualizing the interactions among epistemic thinking, metacognition, and content-specific conceptual change. In T. G. Amin & O. Levrini (Eds.), Converging perspectives on conceptual change: Mapping an emerging paradigm in the learning sciences (pp. 268-286). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spiro, R. J., Feltovitch, P. J., Coulson, R. L., & Anderson, D. K. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: Antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp.498–531). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Styer, D. F. (2000). Insight into entropy. American Journal of Physics, 68(12), 1090–1096. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, M. & Fauconnier, G. (1995). Conceptual integration and formal expression. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(3), 183–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vosniadou, S. & Ortony, A. (1989), Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, D. M. (1983). Some alternative views of energy. Physics Education, 18, 213–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Young, H. D. & Freedman, R. A. (2003). Sears and Zemansky’s university physics: With modern physics (11th ed.). San Francisco: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zumdahl, S. S. (1998). Chemical principles (3rd ed.). Boston: Hought.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Atkins, Leslie
2025. Why We Eat Calories: A Plurality Metaphor of Energy in Scientific Disciplines. Science & Education 34:4  pp. 1889 ff. DOI logo
Müller, Charlotte H. & Martina A. Rau
2025. Instructional Analogies Dominate, Domain-Inherent Metaphors Are Overlooked: A Systematic Review of Metaphorical Mappings in Chemistry Education. Journal of Chemical Education 102:7  pp. 2576 ff. DOI logo
Negrea-Busuioc, Elena, Diana Luiza Simion & Georgiana Udrea
2025. The Heart is a Pump, a Dollhouse, a Car or a Ship: How Students Use Conventional and Spontaneously Generated Creative Metaphors to Understand Biology Concepts. Science & Education DOI logo
Augé, Anaïs
2022. Ideological and explanatory uses of the COVID-19 as a war metaphor in science. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:2  pp. 412 ff. DOI logo
Amin, Tamer G.
2021. Understanding the Role of Image Schemas in Science Concept Learning: Can Educational Neuroscience Help?. In Engaging with Contemporary Challenges through Science Education Research [Contributions from Science Education Research, 9],  pp. 237 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue