In:Drawing Attention to Metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and modalities
Edited by Camilla Di Biase-Dyson and Markus Egg
[Figurative Thought and Language 5] 2020
► pp. 207–228
Is all poetic metaphor deliberate?
Exploring the relationship between verbal creativity and deliberateness
Published online: 8 April 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.5.09pia
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.5.09pia
Abstract
The present study focuses on poetic metaphor with the aim to explore the
relationship between verbal creativity and deliberateness. It has been suggested
that novel metaphors are typically deliberate, although this does not mean that
all conventional metaphor is necessarily non-deliberate (Steen, 2010). In this study, I examine metaphors of time
that appear in poetic texts and are linguistically and conceptually conventional,
showing that they can nevertheless be used deliberately via the linguistic and
textual context(s) in which they are embedded. They are thus endowed with new,
enriched contextual meanings, thereby inviting readers to revise their existing
conceptualisations. I finally conclude that deliberateness can serve as an
overarching framework for identifying poetic metaphor and distinguishing it from
metaphor in poetry.
Keywords: poetic metaphor, deliberateness, conventionality, verbal creativity, time.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Deliberate vs. non-deliberate metaphor
- 3.Poetic metaphor, verbal creativity and deliberateness
- 4.What is poetic metaphor?
- 5.Concluding remarks
Notes References
References (20)
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric
structuring: Understanding time through spatial
metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–28.
Casasanto, D., Fotakopoulou, O. & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Space
and time in the child’s mind: Evidence for a cross-dimensional
asymmetry. Cognitive
Science, 34, 387–405.
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2002). The
way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden
complexities. New York: Basic Books.
(2008). Rethinking
metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought (pp. 53–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gentner, D. (2001). Spatial
metaphors in temporal
reasoning. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial
schemas and abstract
thought (pp. 203–222). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Keeley, E. & Sherrard, P. (1992). C.P.
Cavafy. Collected
poems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The
contemporary theory of
metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor
and thought (2nd
ed.), (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More
than cool reason. A field guide to poetic
metaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Piata, A. (2016). Genre
‘out of the box’: A conceptual integration analysis of poetic
discourse. In N. Stukker, W. Spooren & G. Steen (Eds.), Genre
in discourse and cognition: Concepts, models and
methods (pp. 225–250). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2018). The
poetics of time: Metaphors and blends in language and
literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Piata, A. & Pagán Cánovas, C. (2017). Powerful
rhyme and sluttish time: A cross-linguistic
study of time personification in poetic
discourse. Language &
Literature, 26(1), 18–33.
Radden, G. (2006). The
metaphor time as space across
languages. In E. Górska & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy –
metaphor
collage (pp. 99–120). Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.
Steen, G. (2008). The
paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of
metaphor. Metaphor and
Symbol, 23(4), 213–241.
(2010). When
is metaphor
deliberate? In N.-L. Johannesson, C. Alm-Arvious & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected
papers from the Stockholm 2008 Metaphor
Festival (pp. 43–63). Stockholm: University of Stockholm.
Steen, G. J. (2013). Deliberate
metaphor affords conscious metaphorical
cognition. Journal of Cognitive
Semiotics, 5(1–2), 179–197.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T. & Pasma, T. (2010). A
method for linguistic metaphor identification. From MIP to
MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
