In:At the Crossroads of Historical and Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by Anna Rogos-Hebda and Heli Tissari
[Figurative Thought and Language 21] 2026
► pp. 1–10
Introduction
At the crossroads of historical and cognitive linguistics
Published online: 29 January 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.21.intro
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.21.intro
Article outline
- 1.Previous research
- 2.The organisation of the volume
Note References
References (31)
Allan, K., & Robinson, J. A. (Eds.). (2012). Current
methods in historical semantics. De Gruyter Mouton.
Bergs, A., & Hoffmann, T. (Eds). (2017). Special
issue on cognitive approaches to the history of English: Introduction. English Language
and
Linguistics, 21(2), 193–202.
Closs Traugott, E., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization
and constructional changes. Oxford University Press.
Díaz-Vera, J. E. (Ed.). (2015). Metaphor
and metonymy across time and cultures: Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative
language. De Gruyter Mouton.
Frank, R. M., & Gontier, N. (2010). On
constructing a research model for historical cognitive linguistics (HCL): Some theoretical
considerations. In M. E. Winters, H. Tissari, & K. Allan (Eds.), Historical
cognitive
linguistics (pp. 31–69). (Cognitive
Linguistics Research 47.) Mouton de Gruyter.
Geeraerts, D. (1997). Diachronic
prototype semantics: A contribution to historical
lexicology. Clarendon.
(2015). Four
guidelines for diachronic metaphor research. In J. Díaz-Vera (Ed.), Metaphor
and metonymy across time and cultures: Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative
language (pp. 15–27). De Gruyter Mouton.
Gevaert, C. (2007). The
history of anger: The lexical field of anger from Old to Early Modern
English. [Doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.] Retrieved from [URL]
Harbus, A. (2017). A
cognitive approach to alliteration and conceptualization in medieval English
literature. English Language and
Linguistics, 21(2), 203–219.
Hartmann, S. (2021). Diachronic
cognitive linguistics: Past, present, and future. Yearbook of the German Cognitive
Linguistics
Association, 9, 1–34.
Hintikka, M. (2013). The
well-being of the body as metaphor for society and mind: A corpus-based comparison of Early Modern and Present-day
English. (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki
XCI.) Société Néophilologique de Helsinki.
(2014). Lectio
precursoria: The well-being of the body as metaphor for society and mind: A Corpus-based comparison of
Early Modern and Present-day English. Neupholologische
Mitteilungen, 115(3), 361–364.
Kay, C., & Allan, K. (2015). English
historical semantics. (Edinburgh Textbooks on the English Language —
advanced.) Edinburgh University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women,
fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. The University of Chicago Press.
Mischler, J. J. III. (2013). Metaphor
across time and conceptual space: The interplay of embodiment and cultural
models. John Benjamins.
Nesset, T. (2022). Language
change and cognitive linguistics: Case studies from the history of Russian. (Elements in
Cognitive Linguistics.) Cambridge University Press.
Oncins-Martínez, J. L. (2005). Notes
on the metaphorical basis of sexual language in Early Modern
English. In J. G. Vásquez González, M. Martínez Vásquez, & P. Ron Vaz (Eds.), The
historical linguistics — cognitive linguistics
interface (pp. 205–224). Universidad de Huelva.
Pleyer, M., & Hartmann, S. (2024). Cognitive
linguistics and language evolution. (Elements in cognitive
linguistics.) Cambridge University Press.
Sweetser, E. (1990). From
etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic
structure. Cambridge University Press.
Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). Words
and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Th. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based
approaches to metaphor and
metonymy (pp. 63–105). De Gruyter Mouton.
Tissari, H. (2003). Lovescapes:
Changes in prototypical senses and cognitive metaphors since 1500. (Mémoires de la Société
Néophilologique de Helsinki LXII.) Société Néophilologique.
Trim, R. (2007). Metaphor
networks: The comparative evolution of figurative language. Palgrave Macmillan.
Turner, M. (2017). Conceptual
compression and alliterative form — a response to Harbus. English Language and
Linguistics, 21(2), 221–226.
Vásquez González, J. G., Martínez Vásquez, M., & Ron Vaz, P. (Eds.). (2005). The
historical linguistics — cognitive linguistics interface. Universidad de Huelva.
Winter, B. (2015). Book
review of James J. Mischler III’s Metaphor across time and conceptual space: The interplay of embodiment and
cultural models (John Benjamins 2014 [2013]). Cognitive
Linguistics, 26(1), 155–160.
Winters, M. E. (2020). Historical
linguistics: A cognitive grammar introduction. John Benjamins.
