In:At the Crossroads of Historical and Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by Anna Rogos-Hebda and Heli Tissari
[Figurative Thought and Language 21] 2026
► pp. 50–66
Cognitive and historical concepts of the “career of metaphor”
The case of parasite
Published online: 29 January 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.21.03mus
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.21.03mus
Abstract
The stigmatizing metaphor of human individuals or groups as “(social) parasites” is often treated
as an example of semantic transfer from the biological to the social domain. Historically, however, the application of
the English term “parasite” to social entities/ actors precedes the biological identification of parasitical
organisms. Even after the popularization of the concept of bio-parasites during the Enlightenment,
the older figurative meaning was not fully superseded, so that in present-day use a continuum of variants is found.
This chapter discusses methods of reconstructing the diachronic development of the parasite metaphor
and argues in favour of an approach in which the cognitive idealizations of metaphors’ semantic “careers” are
complemented — and partly corrected — by empirical evidence of socially situated metaphor use and comprehension.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Cognitive metaphor theory and historical linguistics
- 3.From socio- to bio-parasites to class- and race-parasites, and from predatory parasitism to social parasitism: Multiple metaphor careers
- 4.Who calls whom a (social) “parasite” and why in present-day Britain?
- 5.Conclusion
Notes References
References (73)
Antonsen-Resch, A. (2005). Von
Gnathon Zu Saturio: Die Parasitenfigur und das Verhältnis der römischen Komödie zur
griechischen. Walter de Gruyter.
Browne, T. [1642]
(2009). Pseudodoxia epidemica: or, enquiries into commonly presumed
truths. Benediction Classics.
Burleigh, B. A. & Soldati-Fabvre, D. (eds.) (2008). Molecular
mechanisms of parasite invasion. Springer.
Buschinger, A. (2009). Social
parasitism among ants: a review (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological
News, 12, 219–235.
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians
and rhetoric. The persuasive power of
metaphor. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Chew, M. K. & Laubichler, M. D. (2003). Natural
enemies — metaphor or
misconception? Science, 301, 52–53.
Chilton, P. (2005). Manipulation,
memes and metaphors: The case of Mein
Kampf. In L. de Saussure & P. Schulz (Eds.). Manipulation
and ideologies in the Twentieth
Century (pp. 15–43). John Benjamins.
Combes, C. (2005). The
art of being a parasite. Translated by D. Simberloff. The University of Chicago Press.
Damon, C. (1998). The
mask of the parasite. A pathology of Roman patronage. University of Michigan Press.
de Baecque, A. (1997). The
body politic. Corporeal metaphor in Revolutionary France 1770–1800. Stanford University Press.
Drisdelle, R. (2010). Parasites:
Tales of humanity’s most unwelcome guests. University of California Press.
Duden. Das
Herkunftswörterbuch 2013. Das Herkunftswörterbuch.
Etymologie der deutschen Sprache. Ed. J. Riecke. Duden/ Bibliographisches Institut.
Ebner, Julia, Christopher Kavanagh, and Harvey Whitehouse. 2022. The
QAnon Security Threat: A Linguistic Fusion-Based Violence Risk
Assessment. Perspectives on
Terrorism, 16(6), 62–86.
Eubanks, P. (1999). The
story of conventional metaphor. What motivates metaphoric mappings? Poetics
Today, 20(3), 419–442.
Geeraerts, D. & Grondelaers, S. (1995). Looking
back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical
patterns. In J. R. Taylor & R. E. MacLaury (Eds.). Language
and the Cognitive Construal of the
World (pp. 153–179). de Gruyter.
Gevaert, C. (2005). The
anger is heat question: Detecting cultural influence on the conceptualization of anger
through diachronic corpus analysis. In N. Delbecque, J. van der Auwera & D. Geeraerts (Eds.). Perspectives
on Variation: Sociolinguistic, historical,
comparative (pp. 195–208). de Gruyter.
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The
poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press.
Gitelman, Z Y. (2001). A century of
ambivalence: The Jews of Russia and the Soviet Union, 1881 to the
present. Indiana University Press.
Grady, J. & Johnson, C. (2003). Converging
evidence for the notions of subscene and primary
scene. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.). Metaphor
and metonymy in comparison and
Contrast (pp. 533–554). De Gruyter.
Hamerton-Kelly, R. G. (1994). The
king and the crowd: Divine right and popular sovereignty in the French
Revolution. Contagion. Journal of Violence, Mimesis and
Culture, 3, 67–84.
Hawkins, B. (2001). Ideology,
metaphor and iconographic reference. In R. Dirven, R. Frank & C. Ilie (Eds.). Language
and ideology. Vol. II: Descriptive cognitive
approaches (pp. 27–50). John Benjamins.
IMDb. (2023a). Casablanca. [URL] (accessed 5 April 2023)
. (2023b). Parasite. [URL] (accessed 5 April 2023)
Johnson, M. (1987). The
body in the mind. The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and
reason. University of Chicago Press.
(1993). The
contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.). Metaphor
and
Thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge University Press.
(2008). The
neural theory of metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs (ed.). The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
Thought (pp. 17–38). Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More
than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor. University of Chicago Press.
Lenin, V. I. (1963–1969). The
state and revolution. In Collected
Works. (vol. 25, pp. 381–492). Progress Publishers.
Marx, K. (1960). Der
achtzehnte Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte. In: K. Marx & F. Engels. Werke. (vol. 8, pp. 149–158). Dietz Verlag.
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors
dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. University of Chicago Press.
(2015). Dehumanizing
metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of
Language Aggression and
Conflict, 3(1), 41–56.
Nesselrath, H.-G. (2006). Parasite. In H. Cancik, H. Schneider & M. Landfester (Eds.), Brill’s
New Pauly. Brillonline. [URL] (accessed 9 March 2023).
Nevalainen, T. (1999). Early
Modern English lexis and semantics. In R. Lass (Ed.). The
Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. III:
1476–1776 (pp. 332–458). Cambridge University Press.
O’Connor, C. D. & Smith, D. G. E. (Eds.) (2003). Microbial
subversion of host cells. Cambridge University Press.
Robert, P. (1977). Dictionnaire
alphabétique & analogique de la langue française. Eds. A. Rey & J. Rey-Debove, Société du Nouveau Littré.
SOED, Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on historical
principles (2002). Eds. W. R. Trumble & A. Stevenson. Oxford University Press.
Thomas, J. A., Elmes, G. W., Sielezniew, M., Stankiewicz-Fiedurek, A., Simcox, D. J., Settele, J. & Schönrogge, K. (2012). Mimetic
host shifts in an endangered social parasite of ants. Proceedings of the Royal
Society
B 2013, 280: 20122336; [URL] (accessed 13 April 2023)
Topoff, H. & Zimmerli, E. (1993). Colony
takeover by a socially parasitic ant, Polyergus breviceps: the role of chemicals obtained during host-queen
killing. Animal
Behaviour, 46, 479–486.
Urban, M. (2014). Lexical
Semantic Change and semantic reconstruction. In C. Bowern & B. Evans (Eds.). The
Routledge Handbook of Historical
Linguistics (pp. 374–392). Routledge.
Wodak, R. (2011). Suppression
of the Nazi past, coded languages, and discourses of silence: Applying the Discourse-Historical Approach to
post-war anti-Semitism in Austria. In W. Steinmetz (Ed.) Political
languages in the age of
extremes (pp. 351–379). Oxford University Press.
Yu, N. (2008). The
relationship between metaphor, body and
culture. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke & E. Bernárdez (Eds.) Body,
language and mind. Vol. 2. sociocultural
Situatedness (pp. 387–407). Mouton de Gruyter.
