Cover not available

In:Figurativity and Human Ecology
Edited by Alexandra Bagasheva, Bozhil Hristov and Nelly Tincheva
[Figurative Thought and Language 17] 2022
► pp. 181–205

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

What drives emotion and physiological arousal in adverts?

The critical role of figurative operations

ORCiD logo with link | University of Leicester | University of Birmingham
ORCiD logo with link | University of Birmingham
ORCiD logo with link | University of Birmingham
ORCiD logo with link | University of Birmingham
ORCiD logo with link | University of Edinburgh
Published online: 10 November 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.17.08hou
Abstract
The inclusion of figurative operations in marketing videos has the potential to improve the effectiveness of marketing campaigns due to their reported ability to trigger emotional responses, thus making the campaigns resonate more strongly with the viewer. This study explored the relationship between the presence of three figurative operations (hyperbole, metaphor and metonymy) in campaign videos and the levels of physiological arousal and emotion that were triggered by those videos. Seven videos were coded for these three embedded figurative operations. Participants watched the videos in laboratory conditions, where their levels of electrodermal activity and self-report emotional responses were recorded. The ability of these figurative operations to trigger physiological arousal was compared to that of two other features that have been shown to promote arousal (the presence of humor and unmarked contrast). The presence of hyperbole led to higher levels of arousal than humor and unmarked contrast, the presence of metaphor led to higher levels of arousal than humor, and the presence of metonymy led to higher levels of arousal than humor, but lower levels than unmarked contrast. Associations between these arousal levels and the reported emotions are discussed, and collectively provide insights into the optimal use of figurative operations in marketing campaign videos. Our findings contribute to a deeper theoretical understanding of the relationship between figurative operations and arousal, and provide practitioners with information regarding which figurative operations are likely to evoke a stronger emotional response when used in marketing videos.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background to the study
    • The benefits of incorporating figurative operations in advertising
    • The role of emotion in advertising
    • The ability of metaphor, hyperbole and metonymy to trigger emotion
  • 3.Methodology
    • Stimuli
    • Measures
      • Independent variable
      • Dependent variables
    • Participants
    • Procedure
  • 4.Analyses and results
    • Video effects
    • Figurative operations
      • Physiological arousal
      • Emotion
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • References
References (58)
References
Attardo, S. (1997). The semantic foundations of cognitive theories of humor. International Journal of Humor Research, 10(4), 395–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bellman, S., Nenycz-Thiel, M., Kennedy, R., Hartnett, N., & Varan, D. (2019). Best measures of attention to creative tactics in TV advertising: When do attention-getting devices capture or reduce attention? Journal of Advertising Research, 59(3), 295–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benedek, M., & Kaernbach, C. (2010). Decomposition of skin conductance data by means of nonnegative deconvolution. Psychophysiology, 47, 647–658. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bettiga, D., Lamberti, L., & Noci, G. (2017). Do mind and body agree? Unconscious versus conscious arousal in product attitude formation. Journal of Business Research, 75, 108–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bohrn, I. C., Altman, U., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Looking at the brains behind figurative language – a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2669–2683. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Botha, E., & Reyneke, M. (2013). To share or not to share: The role of content and emotion in viral marketing. Journal of Public Affairs, 13(2), 160–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J., Watson, D., Jones, R., & Rowe, M. (2015). A guide for analysing electrodermal activity (EDA) and skin conductance responses (SCRs) for psychological experiments. Technical report for Selective Attention and Awareness Laboratory, Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brodien Hapairai, P. M., Walters, G., & Li, S. (2018). The effectiveness of ad-induced emotion in reducing tourist risk perceptions towards politically unstable destinations. Tourism Recreation Research, 43(4), 483–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Callister, M., & Stern, L. (2007). The role of visual hyperbole in advertising effectiveness. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 29(2), 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campo, S., Askelson, N. M., Spies, E. L., Boxer, C., Scharp, K. M., & Losch, M. E. (2013). “Wow, that was funny”: The value of exposure and humor in fostering campaign message sharing. Social Marketing Quarterly, 19(2), 84–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caruelle, D., Gustafsson, A., Shams, P., & Lervik-Olsen, L. (2019). The use of electrodermal activity (EDA) measurement to understand consumer emotions–a literature review and a call for action. Journal of Business Research, 104, 146–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Castellanos, C., Ausin, M. J., Guixeres, J., & Bigné, E. (2018). Emotion in a 360-degree vs. traditional format through EDA, EEG and facial expressions. In V. Cauberghe et al. (Eds.) Advances in advertising research IX. European Advertising Academy. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, C-T., & Yen, C-T. (2013). Missing ingredients in metaphor advertising: The right formula of metaphor type, product type, and need for cognition. Journal of Advertising, 42(1), 80–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Citron, F., & Goldberg, A. (2014). Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Claridge, C. (2011). Hyperbole in English: A corpus-based study of exaggeration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collet, C., Vernet-Maury, E., Delhomme, G., & Dittmar, A. (1997). Autonomic nervous system response patterns specificity to basic emotions. Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System, 62(1–2), 45–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Critchley, H., & Nagai, Y. (2013). Electrodermal Activity (EDA). In M. D. Gellern & R. Turner (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine (pp. 666–669). New York: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Chernatony, L. (2010). From brand vision to brand evaluation: The strategic process of growing and strengthening brands. Elsevier: Oxford, UK. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dobele, A., Lindgreen, A., Beverland, M., Vanhammer, J., & Wijk, R. (2007). Why pass on viral messages? Because they connect emotionally. Business Horizons, 50, 291–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dolcos, F., LaBar, K. S., & Cabeza, R. (2005). Remembering one year later: role of the amygdala and the medial temporal lobe memory system in retrieving emotional memories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(7), 2626–2631. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunlop, S. M., Cotter, T., & Perez, D. (2014). When your smoking is not just about you: antismoking advertising, interpersonal pressure, and quitting outcomes. Journal of Health Communication, 19(1), 41–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckler, P. & Bolls, P. (2011). Spreading the Virus: Emotional tone and viral advertising and its effect on forwarding intentions and attitudes. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 11(2), 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisend, M. (2018). Explaining the use and effects of humor in advertising: an evolutionary perspective, International Journal of Advertising, 37(4), 526–547. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekman, P., Levenson, R. W., & Friesen, W. V. (1983). Autonomic Nervous System Activity Distinguishes Among Emotions. Science, 221(4616), 1208–1210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetscherin, M., & Toncar, M. (2009). Viewpoint – visual puffery in advertising. International Journal of Market Research, 51(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fridkis, K. (2013). What’s wrong with Dove’s real beauty sketches campaign? Psychology Today, [URL], accessed 17/12/2020.
Gkiouzepas, L. (2015). Metaphor-ad layout consistency effects: The moderating role of personality traits. In I. Banks, P. De Pelsmacker & S. Okazaki (Eds.) Advances in Advertising Research (pp. 3–13). Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gkiouzepas, L., & Hogg, M. K. (2011). Articulating a new framework for visual metaphors in advertising: A structural, conceptual, and pragmatic investigation. Journal of Advertising, 40(1), 103–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goatly, A. (2012). Meaning and humor. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guerreiro, J., Rita, P., & Trigueiros, D. (2015). Attention, emotions and cause-related marketing effectiveness. European Journal of marketing, 49(11/12), 1728–1750. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heath, R., & Nairn, A. (2005). Measuring affective advertising: Implications of low attention processing on recall. Journal of Advertising Research, 45(2), 269–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1987). Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (December), 404–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeong, S-H. (2008). Visual metaphor in advertising: Is the persuasive effect attributable to visual argumentation or metaphorical rhetoric? Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(1), 59–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, L., Kerr, G., & Drennan, J. (2013). Avoidance of advertising in social networking sites: The teenage perspective. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10(2), 16–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreibig, S. D. (2010). Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review, Biological Psychology, 84(2010), 394–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majeed, S., Lu, C., & Usman, M. (2017). Want to make me emotional? The influence of emotional advertisements on women’s consumption behavior. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 11(16), 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2004). “There’s millions of them”: Hyperbole in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(2), 149–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (1996). Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4), 424–438. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, S. E., & Reichert, T. (1999). The message is in the metaphor: Assessing the comprehension of metaphors in advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 28(4), 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mulken, M., Hooft, A., & Nederstigt, U. (2014). Finding the tipping point: Visual metaphor and conceptual complexity in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43(4), 333–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murray, P. (2013). How emotions influence what we buy, Psychology Today [URL] [accessed 18th December 2020].
Nelson-Field, K., Riebe, E., & Newstead, K. (2013). The emotions that drive viral video. Australasian Marketing Journal, 21, 205–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishiyama, T., Sugenoya, J., Matsumoto, T., Iwase, S., & Mano, T. (2001). Irregular activation of individual sweat glands in human sole observed by a videomicroscopy. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical, 88, 117–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ottati, V. C., & Renstrom, R. A. (2010). Metaphor and persuasive communication: a multifunctional approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(9), 783–794. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P., Littlemore, J., & Houghton, D. (2019). The role of figurative complexity in the comprehension and appreciation of advertisements. Applied Linguistics, 40(6), 957–991. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phelps, E. A. (2004). Human emotion and memory: Interactions of the amygdala and hippocampal complex, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 198–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, M. P., Strange, B. A., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Encoding of emotional memories depends on amygdala and hippocampus and their interactions. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 278–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shen, F., & Morris, J. D. (2016). Decoding neural responses to emotion in television commercials: an integrative study of self-reporting and fMRI measures. Journal of Advertising Research, June, 193–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sopory, P., & Dillard, J. P. (2002). The persuasive effects of metaphor: a meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 382–419. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stern, L., & Callister, M. (2020). Exploring variations of hyperbole and puffery in advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 41(1), 71–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tellis, G. J., MacInnis, D. J., Tirunillai, S., & Zhang, Y. (2019). What drives virality (sharing) of online digital content? The critical role of information, emotion, and brand prominence. Journal of Marketing, 83(4), 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toncar, M., & Munch, J. (2001). Consumer responses to tropes in print advertising. Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 55–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woerdl, M., Papagiannidis, S., Bourlakis, M. A., & Li, F. (2008). Internet-induced marketing techniques: Critical factors in viral marketing campaigns. Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 3(1), 35–45Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Suñer, Ferran & Barbara De Cock
2024. The role of reticence in the comprehension of metaphorical taboo expressions in the foreign language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 746 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue