Cover not available

In:Figurativity and Human Ecology
Edited by Alexandra Bagasheva, Bozhil Hristov and Nelly Tincheva
[Figurative Thought and Language 17] 2022
► pp. 123–148

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Translation validity in metaphor theories

CMT, DMT and the Motivation & Sedimentation Model

ORCiD logo with link | Lund University
ORCiD logo with link | Lund University
Published online: 10 November 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.17.06zla
Abstract
Evaluating competing metaphor theories against each other implies the need for theory-independent criteria of comparison. We propose translation validity, the closeness in which theoretical constructs and operationalizations match one another, to be such a criterion. Applying this to Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) and Deliberate Metaphor Theory (DMT) we note that the translation validity of CMT is low, given that its main constructs (“domain”, “cross-domain mappings”) lack clear operationalizations. DMT fares better with a procedure for distinguishing between deliberate and non-deliberate metaphor, but we argue that it needs improvements in clarifying and justifying its operationalizations. After summarizing the Motivation & Sedimentation Model (MSM) of metaphor, we discuss its translation validity in relation to two different studies, one on metaphors for anxiety and stress in psychotherapy discourse, and the other on pictorial and verbo-pictorial metaphors. We argue that while the operationalizations in these studies differ, they both show considerable correspondence to the constructs, and thus a high degree of translation validity. Some weaknesses nevertheless show up under scrutiny, suggesting ways to improve both the level of translation validity and the higher of level construct validity (mapping from phenomena to constructs) of the model. In this process we anticipate a degree of convergence between the DMT and MSM approaches.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Translation validity in CMT and DMT
  • 3.Metaphors in the Motivation & Sedimentation Model
  • 4.Case study 1: Metaphors of subjective experience in psychotherapy
  • 5.Case study 2: Identifying and interpreting metaphors in Greek street art
  • 6.Summary and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (48)
References
Cameron, L. (2018). From metaphor to metaphorizing: How cinematic metaphor opens up metaphor studies. In S. Greifenstein, D. Horst, T. Scherer, C. Schmitt, H. Kappelhoff, & C. Müller (Eds.), Cinematic metaphor in perspective. Reflections on a transdisciplinary framework (pp. 17–35). Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N. (2009). The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2), 63–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clausner, T. C., & Croft, W. (1997). Productivity and schematicity in metaphors. Cognitive science, 21(3), 247–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coseriu, E. (1985). Linguistic competence: what is it really? The Modern Language Review, xxv–xxxv, n.pag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devylder, S., & Zlatev, J. (2020). Cutting and Breaking Metaphors of the Self and the Motivation and Sedimentation Model. In A. Baicchi (Ed.), Figurative meaning construction in thought and language. (pp. 254–281). [Figurative Thought and Language, 9]. Philadelphia & Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (1993). Vagueness’s puzzles, polysemy’s vagaries. Cogntive Linguistics, 4(3), 223–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2017). Metaphor wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grady, J. E. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greve, L. (2018). Review of R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (2017). Metaphor Wars: Conceptual Metaphors in Human Life. Metaphor and the Social World, 8(2), 312 – 318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time, A translation of Sein und Zeit (Vol. Translated by Joan Stambough). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1970 [1900]). Logical Investigations.: Humanities Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jensen, T. W. (2017). Doing metaphor. An ecological perspective on metaphoricity in discourse. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition & discourse (pp. 257–276). Cambrdige: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (2010). Metaphor and cognition. In S. Gallagher & D. Schmicking (Eds.), Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences (pp. 401–414). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krathwohl, D. R. (2009). Methods of educational and social science research: The logic of methods. Longgrove, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krennmayr, T. (2008). Using dictionaries in linguistic metaphor identification. In N.-L. Johannesson & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected Papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals (pp. 109–127). Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2021). Standard and extended conceptual metaphor theory. In Xu Wen & John R. Taylor (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 191–203). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought, Second Edition (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The neural theory of metaphor. Available at SSRN 1437794. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGlone, M. S. (2007). What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor? Language & Communication, 27(2), 109–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (Taylor and Francis e-Library, 2005. ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1968). The visible and the invisible. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moskaluk, K., Zlatev, J.; & van de Weijer, J. (in press). “Dizziness of freedom”: Anxiety disorders and metaphorical meaning-making. Metaphor and Symbol, 37 (4),2022. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz. (2007). MIP: A method for finding metaphorically-used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22, 1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Krennmayr, T., & Steen, G. J. (2018). DMIP: A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language use. Corpus Pragmatics, 2(2), 129–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. (1956). Being and nothingness. New York: Gramercy Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, H.-J. (2020). The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slife, B. D., Wright, C. D., & Yanchar, S. C. (2016). Using operational definitions in research: A best-practices approach. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 119–139.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sonesson, G. (2019). Two models of metaphoricity and three dilemmas of metaphor research. Cognitive Semiotics, 12(1), 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Šorm, E., & Steen, G. (2018). VISMIP: Towards a method for visual metaphor identification. In G. Steen (Ed.), Visual Metaphor: Structure and process (pp. 47–88). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stampoulidis, G. (2021). Street artivism on Athenian walls: A cognitive semiotic analysis of metaphor and narrative in street art. Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stampoulidis, G., & Bolognesi, M. (2019). Bringing metaphors back to the streets: A corpus-based study for the identification and interpretation of rhetorical figures in street art. Visual communication, 1–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stampoulidis, G., Bolognesi, M., & Zlatev, J. (2019). A cognitive semiotic exploration of metaphors in Greek street art. Cognitive Semiotics, 12(1) Special Issue: The rhetoric of contemporary metaphor theory edited by Göran Sonesson and Peer F. Bundgaard (pp. 1–20). 20192008. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torstensson, B. (2019). Metaphors and their Making: Bodily, conventionally and contextually motivated metaphors in inter- and intra-generational conversations. (MA), Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watt, J., & Van Den Berg, S. (2002). Elements of scientific theories: concepts and definitions. Research methods for communication science. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 11–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J. (2010). Phenomenology and cognitive linguistics. In S. Gallagher & D. Schmicking (Eds.), Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive science (pp. 415–443). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Cognitive semiotics. In P. Trifonas (Ed.), International handbook of semiotics (pp. 1043–1067). Springer: Dordrecht. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Meaning making from life to language: The semiotic hierarchy and phenomenology. Cognitive Semiotics, 11(1), 20180001. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Blomberg, J. (2016). Embodied intersubjectivity, sedimentation and non-actual motion expressions. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 39(2), 185–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., Jacobsson, G., & Paju, L. (2021). Desiderata for metaphor theory, the Motivation & Sedimentation Model and motion-emotion metaphoremes In A. S. D. Silva (Ed.), Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage. (pp. 41–74). [Figurative Thought and Language, 11]. Philadelphia & Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., Zywiczynski, P., & Wacewicz, S. (2020). Pantomime as the original human-specific communicative system. Journal of Language Evolution, 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Zlatev, Jordan
2024. Constraining Metaphor and Metonymy in Language and Depiction: A Cognitive Semiotics Approach. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 69:1 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Devylder, Simon
2022. Making metaphor studies less WEIRD. The methodological benefits and challenges of a greater diversity of languages and cultures in the study of metaphor. Lexis :20 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue