In:Figurative Thought and Language in Action
Edited by Mario Brdar and Rita Brdar-Szabó
[Figurative Thought and Language 16] 2022
► pp. 185–212
Verbal and situational irony
On the conceptual mechanisms underlying two patterns of irony
Published online: 28 July 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.16.08bel
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.16.08bel
Abstract
Unlike metaphor and metonymy, irony has no “standardized” conceptual tools to rely on for its detection. The detection of irony proceeds entirely on-line; its comprehension does not rest on prior acquisition of conventional figures in the processes of language learning; it rests on our ability to establish, creatively and on-line, a dynamic relationship between our knowledge of language and the relevant information about the communicative situation and its protagonists. The goal of the present study is to shed light on the conceptual underpinnings of on-line interpretation of two main types of irony, verbal and situational, within a communicative context, using the methodological tools of cognitive linguistics, specifically Blending Theory (Fauconnier & Turner, 2002) and frame semantics (Fillmore, 1977, 1982, 1985).
Keywords: verbal irony, situational irony, Blending Theory, frame semantics
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Conceptual integration as a mechanism of interpreting and processing irony
- 3.Verbal and situational irony
- 3.1Verbal irony
- 3.1.1Ironic utterances based on schematic frames
- 3.1.2Ironic utterances based on specific frames
- 3.2Situational irony
- 3.2.1Situational irony associated with the less conventional frames
- 3.2.2Situational irony associated with highly conventional frames
- 3.1Verbal irony
- 4.Conclusion
Notes References
References (73)
Belaj, B., & Tanacković Faletar, G. (2006). Protučinjenične uvjetne rečenice, mentalni prostori i metonimija u kontekstu teorije konceptualne integracije. Suvremena lingvistika, 32, 151–183.
Bryant, G. A. & Gibbs, R., W. (2015). Behavioral complexities in ironic humor. In G. Brône, K. Feyaerts & T. Veale (Eds.) Cognitive linguistics and humor research (pp. 147–166). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Burgers, C. van Malken, M., & Schellens, P. J. (2011). Finding irony: An introduction of the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP). Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 186–205.
Burgers, C. & Steen, G. J. (2017). Introducing a three-dimensional model of verbal irony: Irony in language, in thought, and in communication. In A. Athanasiadou & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 87–108). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Clark, H. H. & Gerig, R. J. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 121–126.
Colston, H. L. (1997). Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. Discourse Processes, 23, 24–53.
(2017). Irony performance and perception. What underlies verbal, situational and other ironies? In A. Athanasiadou & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 19–41). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2020). Eye-rolling, irony and embodiment. In H. Colston & A. Athanasiadou (Eds.), The diversity of irony (pp. 211–235). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Coulson, S. (2000). Semantic Leaps: Frame-shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2005). Sarcasm and the space structuring model. In S. Coulson & B. Lewandowska-Tomasczyk (Eds.), The literal and the nonliteral in language and thought (pp. 129–144). Berlin: Peter Lang.
Currie, G. (2006). Why irony is pretense. In S. Nichols (Ed.), The architecture of imagination (pp. 111–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dews, S. & Winner, E. (1995). Muting the meaning: A social function of irony. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 3–19.
Dews, S., Kaplan, J. & Winner, E. (1995). Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse Processes, 19, 347–367.
Dews, S. & Winner, E. (1999). Obligatory processing of literal and nonliteral meanings in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1579–1599.
Escandell-Vidal, V. & Leonetti, M. (2020). Grammatical emphasis and irony in Spanish. In H. Colston & A. Athanasiadou (Eds.), The diversity of irony (pp. 183–207). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental Spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1994). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
(1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. In A. E. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and grammar (pp. 113–130). Stanford: CSLI.
(1999). Metonymy and conceptual integration. In K.-U. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 77–91). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Fillmore, C. J. (1971). Verbs of Judging: An Exercise in Semantic Description. In C. J. Fillmore & D. T. Langendoen (Eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics (pp. 272–289). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
(1977). Scenes-and-frames semantics. In A. Zampoli (Ed.), Linguistic Structures processing (pp. 55–81). Amsterdam/New York: North Holland.
(1982). Frame semantics. The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hansin.
Gibbs, R. W. (1979). Contextual effects in understanding indirect requests. Discourse Processes, 2, 1–10.
(1980). Spilling the beans: On understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory and Cognition, 8, 449–456.
(1983). Do people always process the utterance meanings of indirect requests? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9, 524–533.
(1986). On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 3–15.
Gibbs, R. W., O’Brien, J. E., & Doolittle, S. (1995). Inferring meanings that are not intended: Speakers’ intentions and irony comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20, 187–203.
Gibbs, R. W., Bryant, G. A., & Colston, H. (2014). Where is the humor in verbal irony? Humor – International Journal of Humor Research, 27, 575–595.
Gibbs, R. W. & Samermit, P. (2017). How does irony arise in experience? In A. Athanasiadou & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 43–60). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Glucksberg, S. (1995). Commentary on nonliteral language: processing and use. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 47–57.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic.
(1978). Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 9 Pragmatics (pp. 113–128). New York: Academic.
Haiman, J. (1998). Talk is cheap. Sarcasm, alienation and the evolution of language. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Jorgensen, J., Miller, G. A. & Sperber, D. (1984). Test of the mention theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 112–120.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kreuz, R. J. & Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 374–386.
Kreuz, R. J. & Roberts, R. M. (1993). On satire and parody: The importance of being ironic. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 8, 97–109.
Kreuz, R. J. & Link, K. E. (2002). Asymmetries in use of verbal irony. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 127–143.
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (1995). How about another piece of the pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 3–21.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland, & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 195–221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Littman, D. C. & May, J. L. (1991). The nature of irony: Toward a computational model of irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 15, 131–151.
Lucariello, J. (1994). Situational irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 112–120.
Popa-Wyatt, M. (2014). Pretence and echo: Towards an integrated account of verbal irony. International Review of Pragmatics, 6, 127–168.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F., J. & Lozano-Palacio, I. (2019). Unraveling Irony: from Linguistics to Literary Criticism and Back. Cognitive Semantics, 5, 147–173.
Schank, R., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schwoebel, J., Dews, S., Winner, E., & Srinivas, K. (2000). Obligatory processing of literal meaning of ironic utterances. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 47–61.
Sperber, D. (1984). Verbal irony: pretense or echoic mention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 130–136.
Sperber, D, & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use – mention distinction. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 295–318). New York: Academic.
(1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford, England: Blackwell: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tabacaru, S. (2020). Faces of sarcasm. Exploring raised eyebrows with sarcasm in French political debates. In A. Athanasiadou & H. Colston (Eds.), The Diversity of Irony (pp. 256–277). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tobin, V. (2020). Experimental investigations of irony as a viewpoint phenomenon. In A. Athanasiadou & H. Colston (Eds.), The Diversity of Irony (pp. 236–255). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tobin, V. & Israel, M. (2012). Irony as a viewpoint phenomenon. In B. Dancygier & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint in Language (pp. 25–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toplak, M., & Katz, A. N. (2000). On the uses of sarcastic irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1467–1488.
Turner, M. (1996). Conceptual blending and counterfactual argument in the social and behavioral sciences. In P. Tetlock & A. Belkin (Eds.), Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics (pp. 291–295). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (1995). Conceptual integration and formal expression. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 183–204.
(2000). Metaphor, metonymy, and binding. A. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 133–149). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.