Cover not available

In:Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage
Edited by Augusto Soares da Silva
[Figurative Thought and Language 11] 2021
► pp. 1–16

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Introduction
Figurative language

Intersubjectivity and usage

 | Universidade Católica Portuguesa
Published online: 19 May 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.11.int
Article outline
  • 1.Figurative language, intersubjectivity and usage
  • 2.Social and empirical turn in figurativity research
  • 3.Overview of the sections and contributions
    • 3.1Part one. Intersubjectivity and interaction
    • 3.2Part two. Mechanisms and processes
    • 3.3Part three. Usage and variation
  • References
References (53)
References
Allan, K. (2008). Metaphor and metonymy. A diachronic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernárdez, E. (2008a). El lenguaje como cultura. Una crítica del discurso sobre el lenguaje. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008b). Collective cognition and individual activity: Variation, language and culture. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke, & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language, and mind. Volume 2. Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 137–166). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l’action. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carrol, G., & Littlemore, J. (2019). Eye-tracking and the role of context in figurative understanding. Paper presented as part of the Theme session on Eye-tracking for figurative language research: methods, best practices & challenges at the 7th Specialised RaAM seminar, University of Liège, Belgium, 16–17th May 2019.
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric. The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulson, S. (2008). Metaphor comprehension and the brain. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (177–194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Díaz-Vera, J. E. (Ed.) (2015). Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures. Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, C. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Why and how study metaphor, metonymy, and other tropes in multimodal discourse? In Soares da Silva, A., Martins, C., Magalhães, L., & Gonçalves, M. (Eds.), Comunicação, cognição e media (pp. 41–60). Braga: Axioma, Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.) (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). The sociosemiotic commitment. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 527–542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D., & Grondelaers, S. (1995). Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In J. Taylor, & R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the construal of the world (pp. 153–180). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D., Kristiansen, G., & Peirsman, Y. (Eds.) (2010). Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Pres. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S. (2008). How metaphors create categories – quickly. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 67–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glynn, D. (2018). Usage-based cognitive models: Behavioural profiles and quantifying context effects on conceptual metaphors. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Figurative Thought and Language, Braga, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 23–26 October.
Glynn, D., & Fischer, K. (Eds.) (2010). Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gola, E., & Ervas, F. (Eds.) (2016). Metaphor and communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy. The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 323–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haser, V. (2005). Metaphor, metonymy, and experientialist philosophy: Challenging cognitive semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koller, V. (2004). Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture. Universality and variation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kristiansen, G., & Dirven, R. (Eds.) (2008). Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics. How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1990). A usage-based model. In R. W. Langacker. Concept, image, and symbol. The cognitive basis of grammar (pp. 261–288). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse. Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, A., & Zinken, J. (Eds.) (2009). Metaphor and discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, G. B. (1996). Toward a theory of cultural linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rakova, M. (2002). The philosophy of embodied realism: A high price to pay? Cognitive Linguistics, 13(3), 215–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). The extent of the literal. Metaphor, polysemy, and theories of concepts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera, A. (2014). Cognitive modeling. A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2017). Advances in cultural linguistics. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2006). Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhagen, A. (2005). Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Construal and perspectivization. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 48–81). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Grammar and cooperative communication. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 232–252). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winters, M. E., Tissari, H., & Allan, K. (Eds.) (2010). Historical Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., Racine, T. P., Sinha, C., & Itkonen, E. (Eds.) (2008). The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue