Cover not available

In:Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage
Edited by Augusto Soares da Silva
[Figurative Thought and Language 11] 2021
► pp. 339–356

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

The fabric of metaphor in discourse

Interweaving cognition and discourse in figurative language

 | Universidade Federal Fluminense
Published online: 19 May 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.11.11ver
Abstract
The overall aim of this chapter is to contribute to the debate around the controversy of what might be approached as a conceptual or a local/situated metaphor, by elaborating on a distinction between two theoretical levels. On the one hand, at the level of the conceptual system, we have high-order, off-line representations, such as conceptual metaphors, and, on the other, at the level of use, there are episodic, often deliberate, on-line conceptualizations, such as situated metaphors. Within a cognitive-discursive perspective, it is argued that these two levels are articulated, in a coherent and systematic way, in figurative language in use. An analysis of an extended situated metaphor explored in an argumentative text illustrates the way this articulation may be woven in discourse.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Concepts and units of analysis of metaphor in use
  • 3. Online and off-line levels of metaphor in use
  • 4.Exploring local mappings in a metaphor niche
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (35)
References
Barnden, J. (2016). Metaphor and simile: Categorizing and comparing, categorization and comparison. In E. Gola, & F. Ervas (Eds.), Metaphor and communication (pp. 24–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2006). The Emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 671–690. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (2010). Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N. (2009). The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2), 63–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, L. The metaphoric use of boxing terms in everyday language. Available in <[URL]>. Access 30 August 2019.
Fillmore, C. (2006). Frame Semantics. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp. 373–400). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. In R. Gibbs, & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 145–159). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gola, E., & Ervas, F. (Eds.) (2016). Metaphor and communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hampe, B. (2017). Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Metaphor, culture, and discourse: The pressure of coherence. In A. Musolff, & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor in discourse (pp. 11–24). London: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Available at [URL]. Access 12 May 2019.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A Field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2013). Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paveau, M. A. (2013). Os pré-discursos: Sentido, memória e cognição. Campinas: Pontes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Krennmayr, T., & Steen, G. J. (2018). DMIP: A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language use. Corpus Pragmatics, 2(2), 129–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigney, D. (2001). The metaphorical society: An invitation to social theory. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefiel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rocha, C. R. M. (2017). A linguagem bélica no futebol e suas manifestações dentro e fora do campo. M.A. dissertation. Niterói, Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal Fluminense.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. J. (2006). Metaphor in applied linguistics: Four cognitive approaches. D.E.L.T.A., 22, 21–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Underhill, J. (2013). Creating worldviews: Metaphor, ideology and language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. (2009). Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vereza, S. (2010). Articulating the conceptual and the discursive dimensions of figurative language in argumentative texts. D.E.L.T.A., 26, 99–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Discourse, cognition and figurative language: Exploring metaphors in political editorials. In A. S. Silva, J. C. Martins, L. Magalhães, & M. Gonçalves (Eds.), Comunicação política e económica: Dimensões cognitivas e discursivas (pp. 383–394). Braga: Axioma, Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, D. (2006). Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wehling, E. (2016). Moral disgust at its best: The important role of low-level mappings and structural parallelism in political disgust and disease metaphors. In E. Gola, & F. Ervas (Eds.), Metaphor and communication (pp. 189–200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Vereza, Solange Coelho & Dalby Dienstbach
2021. A wave of metaphors: image and visual metaphors in cartoons from a cognitive-discursive perspective. Revista da ABRALIN ► pp. 874 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue