Cover not available

In:Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage
Edited by Augusto Soares da Silva
[Figurative Thought and Language 11] 2021
► pp. 139–174

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Metaphor and irony

Messy when mixed

 | University of Birmingham
Published online: 19 May 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.11.05bar
Abstract
We address metaphor/irony mixing, as in ironic “What a rocket!” about a very slow train. We agree that the final meaning is often better viewed as resting ironically on metaphorical meaning (the train is very fast) than metaphorically resting on ironic meaning (the train is far from being a [literal] rocket). However, we discover that matters are much messier than previously discussed. The reverse meaning dependence can be supported; it can sometimes be preferable; and there is parallel mixing, with irony and metaphor mutually independent. Also, even when hearers do metaphoric processing mostly before ironic processing, they can benefit from first of all detecting the utterance’s ironicity. This in turn suggests metaphor processing that involves contrast-based, as well as similarity-based, mappings.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Examples of irony/metaphor mixing
    • 2.1Some examples suitable for irony-upon-metaphor
    • 2.2An example suitable for metaphor-upon-irony
  • 3.A (non-fatal) problem with metaphor-upon-irony analyses
    • 3.1The potential and cost of metaphor-upon-irony analysis
    • 3.2Pasta and siestas revisited
    • 3.3A middle way
  • 4.The ironicity-first processing strategy
  • 5.Further discussion: When other analyses are appropriate
    • 5.1Contrast-imbued analogy and metaphor
    • 5.2Parallel versus serial mixing of irony and metaphor
    • 5.3Metaphor within attitude-wrapped irony
    • 5.4Hyperbole in metaphor/irony mixtures
  • 6.Summary and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (63)
References
Adachi, T., Koeda, T., Hirabayashi, S., Maeoka, Y., Shiota, M., Wright, E., & Wada, A. (2004). The metaphor and sarcasm scenario test: A new instrument to help differentiate high functioning pervasive developmental disorder from attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Brain & Development, 26, 301–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Athanasiadou, A. (2017). Irony has a metonymic basis. In A. Athanasiadou, & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 201–216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, S. (2000). Irony markers and functions: Towards a goal-oriented theory of irony and its processing. Rask – International journal of Language and Communication, 12(1), 3–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnden, J. A. (2006). Consequences for language learning of an AI approach to metaphor. In J. Salazar, M. Amengual, & M. Juan (Eds), Usos sociales del lenguaje y aspectos psicolingüísticos: Perspectivas aplicadas (pp. 15–57). Palma Mallorca: Universitat de les Illes Baleares.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Metaphor and simile: Fallacies concerning comparison, ellipsis and inter-paraphrase. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(4), 265–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015a). Open-ended elaborations in creative metaphor. In T. R. Besold, M. Schorlemmer, & A. Smaill, (Eds.), Computational creativity research: Towards creative machines (pp. 217–242). London: Atlantis-Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015b). Metaphor, simile, and the exaggeration of likeness. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(1), 41–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Mixed metaphor: Its depth, its breadth, and a pretence-based approach. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 73–112). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Irony, pretence and fictively-elaborating hyperbole. In A. Athanasiadou, & H. L. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 145–177). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Uniting irony, hyperbole and metaphor in an affect-centred, pretence-based framework. In A. Athanasiadou, & H. L. Colston (Eds.). The diversity of irony (pp. 15–65). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bezuidenhout, A. (2001). Metaphor and what is said: a defense of a direct expression view of metaphor. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25, 156–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). The implicit dimension of meaning: ways of “filling in” and “filling out” content. Erkenntnis, 80, 89–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birgisson, B. (2012). Skaldic blends out of joint: Blending theory and aesthetic conventions. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(4), 283–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brüne, M. (2005). ‘Theory of mind’ in schizophrenia: A review of the literature. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 31, 21–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown-Schmidt, S., & Hanna, J. E. (2011). Talking in another person’s shoes: incremental perspective-taking in language processing. Dialogue and Discourse, 2, 11–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bryant, G., & Fox Tree, J. (2005). Is there an ironic tone of voice? Language & Speech, 48, 257–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J. (2016). Figurative framing: shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony. Communication Theory, 26, 410–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgers, C., & Steen, G. J. (2017). Introducing a three-dimensional model of verbal irony: irony in language, in thought, and in communication. In A. Athanasiadou, & H. L. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 87–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camp, E. (2006). Contextualism, metaphor, and what is said. Mind & Language, 21(3), 280–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, R., & Wearing, C. (2015). Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 79, 79–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (2007/1984). On the pretense theory of irony. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr., & H. L. Colston (Eds), Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader (pp. 25–33). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Reprinted from J. Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 121–126 (1984).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. L. (1997). Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. Discourse Processes, 23(1), 25–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007/2000). On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr., & H. L. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader (pp. 97–134). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Reprinted from Pragmatics and Cognition, 8, 277–324 (2000).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Irony performance and perception: What underlies verbal, situational and other ironies?. In A. Athanasiadou, & H. L. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 19–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. L., & Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2002). Are irony and metaphor understood differently? Metaphor and Symbol, 17(1), 57–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. L., & Keller, S. B. (1998). You’ll never believe this: irony and hyperbole in expressing surprise. J. Psycholinguistic Research, 27(4), 499–513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulson, S., & Matlock, T. (2001). Metaphor and the space structuring model. Metaphor and Symbol, 16 (3–4), 295–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Currie, G. (2006). Why irony is pretence. In S. Nichols (Ed.), The architecture of the imagination (pp. 111–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Deconstructing the myth of positively evaluative irony. In M. Jobert, & S. Sorlin (Eds.), The pragmatics of irony and banter (pp. 41–57). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fass, D. (1997). Processing metaphor and metonymy. Greenwich, Connecticut: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frisson, S., & Wakefield, M. (2011). Psychological essentialist reasoning and perspective taking during reading: A donkey is not a zebra, but a plate can be a clock. Memory and Cognition, 40(2), 297–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. (2008). Metaphor as structure-mapping. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 109–128). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2007/2000). Irony in talks among friends. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr., & H. L. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader (pp. 339–360). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Reprinted from Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 5–27 (2000). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, R., & Becker, I. (2019). S/he is not the most sparkling drink in the pub: Global vs. local cue – which reigns supreme? Metaphor and Symbol, 34(3), 141–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1989). Logic and conversation. In H. P. Grice. Studies in the way of words (pp. 22–40). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, A. N., & Lee, C. J. (1993). The role of authorial intent in determining verbal irony and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 8(4), 257–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Bain, J. A., & Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: the role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science, 11(1), 32–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kihara, Y. (2005). The mental space structure of verbal irony. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(3), 513–530. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Johnson, A. A. (2020). The production of verbal irony: How to be an ironist. In J. A. Barnden, & A. Gargett (Eds.), Producing figurative expression: Theoretical, experimental and practical perspectives (pp. 263–295). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Roberts, R. M. (1995). Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor & Symbol, 10(1), 21–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (2007/1995). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of irony. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr., & H. L. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader (pp. 57–95). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Reprinted from J. Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 3–21 (1995).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. 2nd Ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mac Cormac, E. R. (1985). A cognitive theory of metaphor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2004). ‘‘There’s millions of them’’: Hyperbole in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(2), 149–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacKay, G., & Shaw, A. (2004). A comparative study of figurative language in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Child Language, Teaching & Therapy, 20, 13–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2017). Irony and sarcasm in follow-ups of metaphorical slogans. In A. Athanasiadou, & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 127–141). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norbury, C. F. (2005). The relationship between theory of mind and metaphor: Evidence from children with language impairment and autistic spectrum disorder. British Journal of Development Psychology, 23, 383–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, A. (2007). Irony and reversal of evaluation. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1547–1569. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pexman, P. M. (2008). It’s fascinating research: The cognition of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4), 286–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Popa, M. (2011). Ironic metaphor interpretation. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 33(1).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Popa-Wyatt, M. (2017). Compound figures: Priority and speech-act structure. Philosophical Studies, 174(1), 141–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2006). Context and connection in metaphor. Basingstoke, U.K and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rockwell, P. (2000). Lower, slower, louder: Vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 29, 483–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2017). Cognitive modeling and irony. In A. Athanasiadou, & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 179–200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera, A. (2014). Cognitive modeling: A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Lozano, I. (2019). A cognitive-linguistic approach to complexity in irony: Dissecting the ironic echo. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(2), 127–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shamay-Tsoory, S., Tomer, R., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). The neuroanatomical basis of understanding sarcasm and its relation to social cognition. Neuropsychology, 19, 288–300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stern, J. (2000). Metaphor in context. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (2006). The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua, 116, 1722–1743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (2012). Explaining irony. In D. Wilson, & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and relevance (pp. 123–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Barnden, John
2025. Oxymoron and its interplay with metaphor and irony. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 126 ff. DOI logo
O’Dowd, Niamh A
2024. The potential of creative uses of metonymy for climate protest. Discourse & Society 35:3 ► pp. 360 ff. DOI logo
Tian, Dandan, Ling Yann Wong & Muhammad Alif Redzuan Bin Abdullah
2024. Translating metaphors in Chinese satirical literature: A foreignization approach. Forum for Linguistic Studies 6:2 DOI logo
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
2022. Figurative thought and language research in the 21st century. In Figurative Thought and Language in Action [Figurative Thought and Language, 16], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue