Cover not available

In:Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage
Edited by Augusto Soares da Silva
[Figurative Thought and Language 11] 2021
► pp. 41–74

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Desiderata for metaphor theory, the Motivation & Sedimentation Model and motion-emotion metaphoremes

 | Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University | Centre for Language Evolution, Nicolaus Copernicus University
 | Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University
 | Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University
Published online: 19 May 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.11.02zla
Abstract
Metaphor research has increasingly diversified, leading to extensive disagreements. A set of desiderata for any contemporary theory of metaphor are (i) to account for both communication and cognition, (ii) to explain both universal and culture-specific aspects, (iii) to achieve a balance between stable structures and contextual processes, (iv) to apply not only to different languages, but to other semiotic systems such as gesture, (v) to provide clear theoretical and operational definitions. We argue that a recent cognitive-semiotic theory, the Motivation & Sedimentation Model (MSM) is capable of fulfilling these desiderata. To evaluate predictions from the theoretical model we compare motion-emotion metaphoremes, such as my heart jumped, in six differentially related European languages – English, Swedish, Spanish, Bulgarian, Finnish and Estonian.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Five desiderata for a contemporary theory of metaphor
    • 2.1Combining communication and cognition
    • 2.2Combining the universal and the culture-specific
    • 2.3Combining stable and dynamic aspects
    • 2.4Metaphors across semiotic systems
    • 2.5Explicit theoretical and operational definitions
    • 2.6Summary
  • 3.Metaphor within the Motivation & Sedimentation Model
  • 4.Comparing motion-emotion metaphoremes across languages
    • 4.1General considerations
    • 4.2Methodology
    • 4.3Results
    • 4.4Summary
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (82)
References
Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aristotle (1987). The Poetics of Aristotle. Translation and Commentary S. Halliwell. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barcelona, A. (2012). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blomberg, J. (2014). Motion in language and experience: Actual and non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai. Lund University: Lund.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blomberg, J., & Zlatev, J. (2020). Metalinguistic relativity: Does one’s ontology determine one’s view on linguistic relativity? Language & Communication, 76, 35–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolognesi, M., van den Heerik, R., & van den Berg, E. (2018). VisMet 1.0: An online corpus of visual metaphors. In G. Steen (Ed.), Visual metaphor: Structure and process (pp. 89–113). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2006). The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 671–690. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (2008). Why study metaphor and gesture. In A. Cienki, & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 5–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coseriu, E. (1985). Linguistic competence: what is it really? The Modern Language Review, xxv–xxxv. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). The principles of linguistics as a cultural science. Transylvanian Review (Cluj), IX, 1, 108–115.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowley, S. J. (2011). Distributed language. Amserdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devylder, S. (2018). Diagrammatic iconicity explains assymetries in possessive conctructions: Evidence from Paamese. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(2), 313–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devylder, S., & Zlatev, J. (2020). Cutting and breaking metaphors of the self and the Motivation & Sedimentation Model. In A. Baicchi, & G. Radden (Eds.), Figurative meaning construction in thought and language (pp. 253–281). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare: The evolution of human consciousness. New York: Norton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edelman, G. M. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, N., & Wilkins, D. (2000). In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76(3), 546–592. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2008). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foolen, A. (2012). The relevance of emotion for language and linguistics. In A. Foolen, U. Lüdtke, T. Racine, & J. Zlatev (Eds.), Moving ourselves, moving others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language (pp. 349–369). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, C. (2017). Visual and multimodal metaphor in advertising. Styles of Communication, 9(2), 26–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuchs, T., & Koch, S. C. (2014). Embodied affectivity: on moving and being moved. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 508. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 455–479. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. (2008). Metaphor as structure-mapping. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 109–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (2014). Deliteralization and the birth of emotion. In M. Yamaguchi, D. Tay, & B. Blount (Eds.), Approaches to language, culture, and cognition: The intersection of cognitive linguistics and linguistic anthropology (pp. 50–67). London: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Four guidelines for diachronic metaphor research. In J. E. Díaz-Vera (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures: Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language (pp. 15–28). Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D., & Grondelaers, S. (1995). Looking back at anger. Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In J. Taylor, & R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the construal of the world (pp. 153–180). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Metaphor wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grady, J. E. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, J. (2014). Drawn from the ground: Sound, sign and inscription in Central Australian sand stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Houben, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Kuppens, P. (2015). The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 901. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008a). The central role of normativity in language and linguistics. In J. Zlatev, T. P. Racine, C. Sinha, & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp. 279–306). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008b). Concerning the role of consciousness in linguistics. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 15(6), 15–33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobsson, G. (2015). Motion-emotion metaphors in English, Swedish and Spanish: A cross-linguistic comparison. BA thesis, Lund University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobsson, G., & Zlatev, J. (2016). Comparando metáforas de movimento-emoção em Inglês, Sueco e Espanhol. In S. M. S. Cavalcante & J. A. Militão (Eds.), Emoções: desafios para estudos da linguagem e cognição (pp. 73–101). Belo Horizonte: PUC Minas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Metaphor and cognition. In S. Gallagher, & D. Schmicking (Eds.), Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive sciences (pp. 401–414). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, N. (2017). No is not enough: Defeating the new shock politics. London: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kolter, A., Ladewig, S. H., Summa, M., Müller, C., Koch, S. C., & Fuchs, T. (2012). Body memory and the emergence of metaphor in movement and speech. In S. C. Koch, T. Fuchs, M. Summa, & C. Müller (Eds.), Body memory, metaphor and movement (pp. 201–226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krennmayr, T. (2006). Using dictionaries in linguistic metaphor identification. In N. -L. Johannesson, & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected Papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals (pp. 97–115). Stockholm: Department of English, Stockholm University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1990). The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The neural theory of metaphor. Available at SSRN [URL] or
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2017). Entrenchment in cognitive grammar. In H. -J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, (pp. 39–56). Berlin: De Gruyter.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacArthur, F. (2015). On using a dictionary to identify the basic senses of words. Metaphor and the Social World, 5(1), 124–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (Taylor and Francis. e-Library, 2005. ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1964). The primacy of perception. Evanstone, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2016). Why mixed metaphors make sense. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 31–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C., & Kappelhoff, H. (2018). Cinematic metaphor: Experience–affectivity–temporality. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Naidu, V., Zlatev, J., Duggirala, V., Van De Weijer, J., Devylder, S., & Blomberg, J. (2018). Holistic spatial semantics and post-Talmian motion event typology: A case study of Thai and Telugu. Cognitive Semiotics, 11(2), 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paju, L. (2016). Motion-emotion metaphors in Estonian: A cross-linguistic comparison with Finnish, English and Swedish. MA thesis, Lund University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz (2007). MIP: A method for finding metaphorically-used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22, 1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saeed, J. I. (2009). Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stampoulidis, G., & Bolognesi, M. (2019). Bringing metaphors back to the streets: A corpus-based study for the identification and interpretation of rhetorical figures in street art. Visual Communication. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stampoulidis, G., Bolognesi, M., & Zlatev, J. (2019). A cognitive semiotic exploration of metaphors in Greek street art. Cognitive Semiotics, 12(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torstensson, B. (2019). Metaphors and their making: Bodily, conventionally and contextually motivated metaphors in inter- and intra-generational conversations. MA Thesis, Lund University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dam, W. O., Rueschemeyer, S. -A., & Bekkering, H. (2010). How specifically are action verbs represented in the neural motor system: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 53(4), 1318–1325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zinken, J. (2007). Discourse metaphors: The link between figurative language and habitual analogies. Cognitive Linguistics, 18, 445–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J. (2005). What’s in a schema? Bodily mimesis and the grounding of language. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 313–343). Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Cognitive semiotics: An emerging field for the transdisciplinary study of meaning. Public Journal of Semiotics, 4, 2–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Cognitive semiotics. In P. Trifonas (Ed.), International handbook of semiotics (pp. 1043–1067). Springer: Dordrecht. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Turning back to experience in Cognitive Linguistics via phenomenology. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 559–572. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Meaning making from life to language: The semiotic hierarchy and phenomenology. Cognitive Semiotics, 11(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Mimesis theory, learning and polysemiotic communication In M. Peters (Ed.), Encylcopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., Blomberg, J., & David, C. (2010). Translocation, language and the categorization of experience. In V. Evans (Ed.) Space in language and cognition: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 389–418). London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., Blomberg, J., & Magnusson, U. (2012). Metaphors and subjective experience: motion-emotion metaphors in English, Swedish, Bulgarian and Thai. In A. Foolen, U. M. Lüdtke, T. P. Racine, & J. Zlatev (Eds.), Moving ourselves, moving others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consiousness, and language (pp. 423–450). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Blomberg, J. (2019). Norms of language: What kinds and where from? Insights from phenomenology. In A. Mäkilähde, V. Leppänen & E. Itkonen (Eds.) Normativity in language and linguistics (pp. 69–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., Zywiczynski, P., & Wacewicz, S. (2020). Pantomime as the original human-specific communicative system. Journal of Language Evolution, 5(2), 156–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (18)

Cited by 18 other publications

Dalissier, Michel
2025. The Weight of Sedimentation: From Husserl to Foucault. Dialogue ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Glukhova, Olga & Olga
2025. Cognitive typology matters: A bibliometric review using Prisma protocol and Vosviewer. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow. ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Keränen, Jarkko
2025. Somatosensory iconicity: Insights from sighted signers and blind gesturers. Open Linguistics 11:1 DOI logo
Van Lith, Theresa, Emma Cornwall, Nancy Gerber, Ashley He & Madeline Centracchio
2025. Visual narratives as evidence: Surveying the role of metaphors in art therapy. The Arts in Psychotherapy 94 ► pp. 102296 ff. DOI logo
Zhu, Dongmei
2025. Improvement of metaphor understanding via a cognitive linguistic model based on hierarchical classification and artificial intelligence SVM. Scientific Reports 15:1 DOI logo
Akkaraca Kose, Melike & Ruth Breeze
2024. Displays of anger in Turkish political discourse: a hard choice between cultural norms and political performance of anger. Language and Cognition 16:4 ► pp. 843 ff. DOI logo
Oakley, Todd & Jordan Zlatev
2024. Origins of money: a Motivation & Sedimentation Model (MSM) analysis. Semiotica 2024:257 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Schumann, Chiara
2024. Metaphors Octopuses Live By? – A Cognitive Zoosemiotic Survey on Behavioral Mimicry as Evolutionary Contribution to Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Linguistic Frontiers 7:3 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Steen, Gerard
2024. The Ambiguity of Metaphor: How Polysemy Affords Multivalent Metaphor Use and Explains the Paradox of Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 39:4 ► pp. 242 ff. DOI logo
Steen, Gerard J.
2023. Thinking by metaphor, fast and slow: Deliberate Metaphor Theory offers a new model for metaphor and its comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Zlatev, Jordan
2023. The Intertwining of Bodily Experience and Language: The Continued Relevance of Merleau-Ponty. Histoire Épistémologie Langage :45-1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Zlatev, Jordan
2024. Constraining Metaphor and Metonymy in Language and Depiction: A Cognitive Semiotics Approach. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 69:1 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Bagasheva, Alexandra, Bozhil Hristov & Nelly Tincheva
2022. Introduction. In Figurativity and Human Ecology [Figurative Thought and Language, 17], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Devylder, Simon
2022. Making metaphor studies less WEIRD. The methodological benefits and challenges of a greater diversity of languages and cultures in the study of metaphor. Lexis :20 DOI logo
Zlatev, Jordan & Kalina Moskaluk
2022. Translation validity in metaphor theories. In Figurativity and Human Ecology [Figurative Thought and Language, 17], ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Faur, Elena
2021. Filologia modernă: realizări şi perspective în context european, Eugeniu Coșeriu: 100 de ani de la naștere. Limbajul ca sumă de valori, ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Theoretical Perspectives on Terminology [Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice, 23], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Slowing Metaphor Down [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 26], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue