Cover not available

In:Irony in Language Use and Communication
Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou and Herbert L. Colston
[Figurative Thought and Language 1] 2017
► pp. 201–216

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 9
Irony has a metonymic basis

Published online: 14 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.1.10ath
Abstract
Irony often cooperates with many other figures like metonymy, metaphor, hyperbole, simile. Metonymy, is argued, constitutes the basis for irony. To this effect, two frequent types of constructions that exhibit irony are studied. The particular constructions that encourage and activate irony are the adjective-noun pair and the like-construction. In the former case, ironic evaluation is expressed by means of opposing scripts while in the latter, ironic evaluation is expressed by means of comparison where dissimilarity is evoked. In both cases, figuration is evoked by constructional aspects as well. Metonymy is the conceptual process which provides the foundation onto which irony, too, is built. It is highly responsible for the production and interpretation of ironic constructions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Verbal irony
    • 2.1Opposing scripts
    • 2.2Hyperbolic (dissimilar) comparison
  • 3.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (43)
References
Athanasiadou, A. (2007). On the subjectivity of intensifiers. Language Sciences, 29, 554–565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barcelona, A. (2002). Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within Cognitive Linguistics: An update. In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp. 207–277). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnden, J. (2010). Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21–1, 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R. (2003). Metonymic coding of linguistic action in English, Croatian and Hungarian. In K.-U. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing (pp. 241–266). J. Benjamins Publishing Company. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgers, Chr., van Mulken, M., & Schellens, P. J. (2011). Finding Irony: An Introduction of the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP). Metaphor and Symbol, 26:3, 186–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camp, E. (2012). Sarcasm, Pretense, and The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Noûs, 46:4, 587–634. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, R. & Wearing, C. (2011). Metaphor, hyperbole and simile: A pragmatic approach. Language and Cognition, 3–2, 283–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. L. & Gibbs, R. W. (2002). Are Irony and Metaphor Understood Differently? Metaphor and Symbol, 17:1, 57–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. L. & Keller, S. (1998). You’ll never believe this: Irony and hyperbole in expressing surprise. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 499–513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. L. & O’Brien, J. (2000a). Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1557–1583. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000b). Contrast of kind vs. contrast of magnitude: The pragmatic accomplishments of irony and hyperbole. Discourse Processes, 30, 179–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulson, S. (2005). Sarcasm and the space structuring model. In S. Coulson, & B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Eds.), Literal and Nonliteral in Language and Thought (pp. 129–144). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative Language. CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D. & Bowdle, B. (2001). Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 16: 3-4, 223–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (Eds.). (2007). Irony in Language and Thought. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Taylor & Francis Group. New York, London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, R. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19: 239–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding Figurative Language. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 323–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, P. H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1978). Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics: Pragmatics (pp. 113–127). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herrero Ruiz, J. (2011). The role of metonymy in complex tropes. Cognitive operations and pragmatic implications. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics. Towards a consensus view (pp. 167–193). J. Benjamins Publishing Company. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Israel, M., Riddle Harding, J., & Tobin, V. (2004). On simile. In M. Achard, & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, Culture and Mind (pp. 123–135). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kay, P. C., & Fillmore, Ch. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? construction. Language, 75, 1, 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kihara, Y. (2005). The mental space structure of verbal irony. Cognitive Linguistics, 16:3, 513–530. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy. Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1995). Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moder, C. (2008). It’s like making a soup: Metaphors and similes in spoken news discourse. In A. Tyler, Y. Kim, & M. Takada (Eds.), Language in the Context of Use. Discourse and Cognitive Approaches to Language (pp. 301–320). Mouton de Gruyter, CLR 37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014b). Metaphor, Irony and Blending. Argumentum, 10, 611–630.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & L. Thornburg (2012). Antonymy in language structure and use. In M. Brdar, I. Raffaelli, & M. Z. Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics between universality and variation (pp. 159–186). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Exploiting wh-questions for expressive purposes. In A. Athanasiadou (Ed.), Studies in Figurative Thought and Language (pp. 17–40). J. Benjamins Publishing Company. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a Theory of Metonymy. In K.-U. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds), Metonymy in Language and Thought (pp. 17–59). J. Benjamins Publishing Company. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (2000). The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 109–132). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Metonymy and cognitive operations. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 103–123). J. Benjamins Publishing Company. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. HCP series 28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Diez Velasco, O. I. (2003). Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp. 489–532). Mouton de Gruyter. Berlin/New York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F., & Galera, A. (2014). Cognitive Modeling. A linguistic perspective. J. Benjamins Publishing Company. Amsterdam/Philadelphia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use – mention distinction. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 295–318). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sullivan, K. (2013). Frames and Constructions in Metaphoric Language. J. Benjamins Publishing Company. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tobin, V., & Israel, M. (2012). Irony as a viewpoint phenomenon. In B. Dancygier, & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint in Language (pp. 25–46). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vosshagen, Chr. (1999). Opposition as a Metonymic Principle. In K.-U. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought (pp. 289–308). J. Benjamins Publishing Company. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua, 87: 53–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (15)

Cited by 15 other publications

Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
2025. Metonymy typologies revisited. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Barnden, John
2021. Metaphor and irony. In Figurative Language - Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Barnden, John
2023. Irony, Exaggeration, and Hyperbole: No Embargo on the Cargo!. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 272 ff. DOI logo
Givoni, Shir, Dafna Bergerbest & Rachel Giora
2021. On figurative ambiguity, marking, and low-salience meanings. In Figurative Language - Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Lehmann, Claudia & Alexander Bergs
2021. As if irony was in stock. Constructions and Frames 13:2 ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Inés Lozano-Palacio
2021. On verbal and situational irony. In Figurative Language - Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2020. Intensification via figurative language. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9], ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2024. Cultural Conceptualizations of Irony Versus Arrogance and their Figurative Expression. In The Handbook of Cultural Linguistics [Springer Handbooks in Languages and Linguistics, ], ► pp. 697 ff. DOI logo
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2025. Verbal irony. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
Baicchi, Annalisa
2020. Figurativeness all the way down. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Barnden, John A.
2017. Irony, pretence and fictively-elaborating hyperbole. In Irony in language use and communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1], ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Barnden, John A.
2022. Metonymy, reflexive hyperbole and broadly reflexive relationships. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Introduction to Cognitive Pragmatics [Cognitive Linguistics in Practice, 4], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Modeling Irony [Figurative Thought and Language, 12], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Irony, Affect, and Related Figures. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue