Cover not available

In:Irony in Language Use and Communication
Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou and Herbert L. Colston
[Figurative Thought and Language 1] 2017
► pp. 179–200

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 8
Cognitive modeling and irony

Published online: 14 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.1.09dem
Abstract
This chapter studies the role of the pragmatic notion of echo in creating ironic meaning. The notion of echo is treated as a cognitive operation rather than just a pragmatic task, which combines with other cognitive operations of at least two kinds: concept-building and inferential. The former operations include the creation of echoed and observed scenarios. The latter include the cancellation and addition of structure in an echoed scenario resulting from the contrast between the two scenarios. This account of irony, which is complementary of the one developed in Relevance Theory, allows us to trace the origin of the speaker’s attitudinal component in an ironic utterance to the underlying cognitive activity involving the cancellation of echoed assumptions within an inferential reasoning schema.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A brief overview of approaches
  • 3.Echoing
  • 4.Ironic echoing
  • 5.Contrasting
  • 6.Cognitive modeling
  • 7.Modeling irony
  • 8.Special cases of echoing operations involving irony
  • 9.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (42)
References
Anderson, John R. (2010). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, S. (2000). Irony as Relevant Inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 793–826. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnden, J. (this volume). Irony, pretence and fictively-elaborating hyperbole. In A. Athanasiadou & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in Language Use and Communication. FTL series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H., & Gerrig, R. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 121–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. L., & Gibbs, R. W. (2002). Are irony and metaphor understood differently. Metaphor and Symbol, 17(1), 57–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Currie, G. (2006). Why irony is pretence. In S. Nichols (Ed.), The architecture of the imagination (pp.111–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elleström, L. (2002). Divine Madness. On interpreting literatures, music, and the visual arts ironically. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallese, V. (2003). The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: The quest for a common mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 358: 1231–1240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts’ The role of sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22: 455–479. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind & Language 21(3), 434–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Experimental tests of figurative meaning construction. In G. Radden, K. M. Köpke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (eds.) Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 19–32). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Discourse Processes 48(8), 529–562. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (Eds.) (2007). Irony in language and thought. A cognitive science reader. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grady, J. (1999). A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: correlation vs. resemblance. In R. W. Gibbs, & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, P. H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and seman- tics: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 37–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (1995). How about another piece of the pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 3–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1967). A Linguistic guide to English poetry. London / New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, K. -U., & Thornburg, L. (1998). A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 755–769. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Eds.) (2003). Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, K. -U. (2005). The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, & S. Peña (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics. Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 353–386). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2000). The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 109–132). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2014). Mapping concepts. Understanding figurative thought from a cognitive-linguistic perspective. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 27(1), 187–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Metaphor and other cognitive operations in interaction: from basicity to complexity. In Beate Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition, and discourse (pp. 138–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F., & Galera, A. (2014). Cognitive Modeling. A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Pérez, L. (2001). Metonymy and the grammar: Motivation, constraints, and interaction. Language and Communication, 21, 321–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Cognitive operations and pragmatic implication. In K. -U. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp. 23–49). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F., & Pérez, L. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 161–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veale, T. (2012). Exploding the creativity myth. The computational foundations of linguistic cre- ativity. London & New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, N., & Gibbs, R. (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31, 721–731. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2012). Explaining irony. In D. Wilson, & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and Relevance (pp. 123–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (31)

Cited by 31 other publications

Copet, Simon
2025. Review of Monti & Mitkov (2024): Recent Advances in Multiword Units in Machine Translation and Translation Technology. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation / Revista Internacional de Traducción 71:6 ► pp. 851 ff. DOI logo
de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José Ruiz & Inés Lozano Palacio
2025. Understanding ironic echoing. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 248 ff. DOI logo
Ibáñez, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza & Inés Lozano-Palacio
2019. A Cognitive-Linguistic Approach to Complexity in Irony: Dissecting the Ironic Echo. Metaphor and Symbol 34:2 ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Inés Lozano-Palacio
2021. On verbal and situational irony. In Figurative Language - Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Peña-Cervel, Mª Sandra
2025. Sources of incongruity in advertising. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Liying & Mengjie Zhang
2025. From Dialogue to Monologue: A Dialogic Syntax Approach to the Construal Mechanism of “爱(ai) V不(bu) V” in Chinese . International Journal of Language and Linguistics 13:2 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Wen, Xu & Yaling Tian
2025. Understanding ironic utterances: A comprehensive examination of ChatGPT-4o. Intercultural Pragmatics 22:2 ► pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Zajączkowska, Maria, Katarzyna Branowska, Anna Olechowska, Aleksandra Siemieniuk, Piotr Kałowski & Natalia Banasik-Jemielniak
2025. Sarcam Use in Polish and Turkish: The Role of Personality, Age and Gender. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 54:6 DOI logo
Kratochvílová, Dana
2024. Review of Peña-Cervel & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (2022): Figuring out figuration: A cognitive linguistic account. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
Martín-Gascón, Beatriz
2024. Irony in American-English tweets. In Recent Advances in Multiword Units in Machine Translation and Translation Technology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 366], ► pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Nyachoi, E. O., N. K. Ayodi & A. Meitamei
2024. A Comparative Analysis of the Use Irony in Hero Depictions in Kiswahili Epics of Mikidadi and Mayasa and Fumo Liyongo. International Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics 7:4 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Antloga, Špela
2023. Review of Peña-Cervel & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (2022): Figuring out Figuration: A Cognitive Linguistic Account. Metaphor and the Social World 13:2 ► pp. 316 ff. DOI logo
Lozano-Palacio, Inés
2023. A multidimensional approach to echoing. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 210 ff. DOI logo
Lozano-Palacio, Inés
2024. A cognitive-pragmatic account of the structural elements of the ironic event. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1 ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José Ruiz
2022. Analogical and Non-analogical Resemblance in Figurative Language: A Cognitive-Linguistic Perspective. In Metaphors and Analogies in Sciences and Humanities [Synthese Library, 453], ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José Ruiz de
2023. Irony and Cognitive Operations. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 38 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2020.  Figurative language. In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10], ► pp. 469 ff. DOI logo
Peña Cervel, Ma Sandra
2022. For Better, for Worse, for Richer, for Poorer, in Sickness and in Health: A Cognitive-Linguistic Approach to Merism. Metaphor and Symbol 37:3 ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & María Asunción Barreras Gómez
2022. Linguistic and metalinguistic resemblance. In Figurativity and Human Ecology [Figurative Thought and Language, 17], ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Barnden, John
2021. Metaphor and irony. In Figurative Language - Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Barnden, John
2023. Irony, Exaggeration, and Hyperbole: No Embargo on the Cargo!. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 272 ff. DOI logo
Lehmann, Claudia
2021. About as boring as flossing sharks: Cognitive accounts of irony and the family of approximate comparison constructions in American English. Cognitive Linguistics 32:1 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Lehmann, Claudia & Alexander Bergs
2021. As if irony was in stock. Constructions and Frames 13:2 ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Galera Masegosa, Alicia
2020. The role of echoing in meaning construction and interpretation. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Reda, Ghsoon
2020. Echoing-contrast combination in non-ironic constructions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:2 ► pp. 458 ff. DOI logo
Reda, Ghsoon
2023. Conceptual Development and Change: The Role of Echoing and Contrast as Cognitive Operations. In Brain, Decision Making and Mental Health [Integrated Science, 12], ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Modeling Irony [Figurative Thought and Language, 12], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Figuring out Figuration [Figurative Thought and Language, 14], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. The Scope of Irony. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Irony, Affect, and Related Figures. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. Evaluative Discourse Metaphor in Online Communities [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 106], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue