Cover not available

In:Irony in Language Use and Communication
Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou and Herbert L. Colston
[Figurative Thought and Language 1] 2017
► pp. 145–178

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 7
Irony, pretence and fictively-elaborating hyperbole

Published online: 14 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.1.08bar
Abstract
This article broadly adopts a well-known approach to verbal irony: taking ironic speakers to be engaging in pretence; and it follows others in viewing the pretences as (micro-)dramas created by the ironists, who act characters in the dramas. But it breaks new ground by strongly emphasizing the world of the drama (the drama’s world). In drama, acted characters operate within some implied world (e.g., a historical setting). Equally, in irony there is such a world. We then see a triangle of contrast: not only (a) the opposition usually considered in irony theory – between acted characters’ views/attitudes and the nature of the real world – but also potential contrast between (b) those views/attitudes and the rest of the drama’s world, and between (c) drama’s world and real world. This particularly helps us analyse fictively-elaborating hyperbole, arising from drama-world details invented by ironists. The article also invites non-pretence irony theories to try to account for the effects.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Assumptions about irony and hyperbole
    • 2.1Irony
    • 2.2Hyperbole: Initial comments
    • 2.3Scalar hyperbole and hyperbole within irony
    • 2.4Ficitvely-elaborating hyperbole
  • 3.More on pretence and drama in irony
    • 3.1Location in the theoretical landscape
    • 3.2The pretended/acted speaker
    • 3.3Export of criticizing attitude
    • 3.4Drama’s world versus real world
  • 4.The corners of a triangle: Acted speaker, drama’s world and real world
    • 4.1Critical irony: Where Winifred should know about the bad weather
    • 4.2Being yet more critical
    • 4.3Non-person-criticizing irony: Ian & Winifred
    • 4.4Non-person-criticizing irony, contd: Ian alone
  • 5.The drama’s world and fictively-elaborating hyperbole
    • 5.1Ian the hyperbolic ironist
    • 5.2The picnic
    • 5.3Other examples
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (35)
References
Athanasiadou, A. (this volume). Irony has a metonymic basis. In A. Athanasiadou & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in Language Use and Communication. FTL series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Brdar-Szabó, R. & Brdar, M. (2010). “Mummy, I love you like a thousand ladybirds”: Reflections on the emergence of hyperbolic effects and the truth of hyperboles. In A. Burkhardt & B. Nerlich (Eds), Tropical Truth(s): The Epistemology of Metaphor and Other Tropes, pp.383–427. Berlin / New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, R. & Wearing, C. (2015). Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 79, pp.79–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. L. (1997). Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. Discourse Processes, 23(1), pp.25–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007/2000). On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. & H. L. Colston (Eds), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader, pp.97–134. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Reprinted from Pragmatics and Cogni- tion, 8, pp.277–324 (2000).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Gerrig, R. J. (2007/1984). On the pretense theory of irony. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. & H. L. Colston (Eds), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader, pp.25–33. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Reprinted from J. Experimental Psychology: General, 113, pp.121–126 (1984).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. L. & Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2002). Are irony and metaphor understood differently? Metaphor and Symbol, 17(1), pp.57–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. L., & Keller, S. B., (1998). You’ll never believe this: irony and hyperbole in expressing surprise. J. Psycholinguistic Research, 27(4), pp.499–513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. L. & O’Brien, J. (2000). Contrast of kind versus contrast of magnitude: The pragmatic accomplishments of irony and hyperbole. Discourse Processes 30(2), pp.179–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulson, S. (2005). Sarcasm and the space structuring model. In S. Coulson & B. Lewandowska- Tomaszczyk (Eds.), The Literal and Nonliteral in Language and Thought, pp. 129–44. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Currie, G. (2006). Why irony is pretence. In S. Nichols (Ed.), The Architecture of the Imagination, pp.111–133. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Echo et feintise: quelle est la difference et qui a raison? Philosophiques, 35(1): pp.12–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental spaces: aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2007/2000). Irony in talks among friends. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. & H. L. Colston (Eds), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader, pp.339–360. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Reprinted from Metaphor and Symbol, 15, pp.5–27 (2000).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herrero Ruiz, J. (2009). Understanding tropes: At the crossroads between pragmatics and cognition. Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kihara, Y. (2005). The mental space structure of verbal irony. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(3), pp.513–530. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J. & Roberts, R. M. (1995). Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor & Symbol, 10(1), pp.21–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S. & Brown, M. (2007/1995). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of irony. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. & H. L. Colston (Eds), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader, pp.57–95. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Reprinted from J. Experimental Psychology: General, 124, pp.3–21 (1995).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, C. & Katz, A. (1998). The differential role of ridicule in sarcasm and irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 13, 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lepore, E. & Stone, M. (2014). Imagination and Convention: Distinguishing Grammar and Inference in Language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. & Carter, R. (2004). ‘‘There’s millions of them’’: hyperbole in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 36 (2), pp.149–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), pp.23–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(this volume). Irony and sarcasm in follow-ups of metaphorical slogans. In A. Athanasiadou & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in Language Use and Communication. FTL series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Noh, E. -J. (2000). Metarepresentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peña, M.S. & Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. (2017). Construing and constructing hyperbole. In A. Athanasiadou (Ed.), Studies in Figurative Thought and Language, pp. 42–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Popa-Wyatt, M. (2014). Pretence and echo: Towards an integrated account of verbal irony Interna- tional Review of Pragmatics 6(1), pp.127–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Récanati, F. (2007). Indexicality, context and pretence: A speech-act theoretic account. In Burton-Roberts, N. (Ed.), Advances in Pragmatics, pp.213–229. Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2014). Mapping concepts. Understanding figurative thought from a cognitive-linguistic perspective. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 27(1), pp.187–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(this volume). Cognitive modeling and irony. In A. Athanasiadou & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in Language Use and Communication. FTL series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd Edition). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swift, J. (1729). A modest proposal for preventing the children of poor people from being a burthen to their parents or the country, and for making them beneficial to the publick. Third Edition. Dublin: S. Harding, 1729. (Reprinted as A Modest Proposal, London: Penguin, 2015.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tobin, V. & Israel, M. (2012). Irony as a viewpoint phenomenon. In B. Dancygier & E. Sweetser (Eds), Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective, pp.25–46. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, K. L. (1990). Mimesis as make-believe: On the foundations of the representational arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (2006). The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua 116, pp.1722–1743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (2012). Explaining irony. In D. Wilson & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and Relevance, pp. 123–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (23)

Cited by 23 other publications

de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José Ruiz & Inés Lozano Palacio
2025. Understanding ironic echoing. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 248 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Inés Lozano-Palacio
2021. On verbal and situational irony. In Figurative Language - Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Oben, Bert, Clarissa de Vries & Geert Brône
2025. Mobile eye-tracking and mixed-methods approaches to interaction analysis. In Mobile Eye Tracking [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 351], ► pp. 100 ff. DOI logo
Peña-Cervel, Mª Sandra
2025. Sources of incongruity in advertising. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
Tabacaru, Sabina
2025. “That was really a productive segment, wasn’t it?” Nonverbal markers of humor in the American presidential debates of 2016 and 2020. Frontiers in Psychology 15 DOI logo
Barnden, John A.
2022. Metonymy, reflexive hyperbole and broadly reflexive relationships. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2021. The multimodal recycling machine: toward a cognitive-pragmatic theory of the text/image production. Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics 12:3 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Barnden, John
2021. Metaphor and irony. In Figurative Language - Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Barnden, John
2023. Irony, Exaggeration, and Hyperbole: No Embargo on the Cargo!. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 272 ff. DOI logo
Barnden, John
2025. Oxymoron and its interplay with metaphor and irony. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 126 ff. DOI logo
Brône, Geert
2021. The multimodal negotiation of irony and humor in interaction. In Figurative Language - Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
de Vries, Clarissa, Bert Oben & Geert Brône
2021. Exploring the role of the body in communicating ironic stance. Languages and Modalities 1 ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Geeraerts, Dirk
2021. Second-order empathy, pragmatic ambiguity, and irony. In Figurative Language - Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Geeraerts, Dirk
2022. What does it mean to wear a mask?. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 70 ff. DOI logo
Musolff, Andreas
2021. Having your cake, eating it and losing the (p)lot : the combination of proverb, hyperbole and sarcasm in (and about) Brexiters’ discourses. Observatoire de la société britannique :27 ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Ervas, Francesca
2020.  How nice does it sound?. In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10], ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Popa-Wyatt, Mihaela
2020.  Mind the gap. In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10], ► pp. 449 ff. DOI logo
de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José Ruiz
2017. Cognitive modeling and irony. In Irony in language use and communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1], ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2020.  Figurative language. In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10], ► pp. 469 ff. DOI logo
Giora, Rachel, Dalia Meytes, Ariela Tamir, Shir Givoni, Vered Heruti & Ofer Fein
2017. Defaultness shines while affirmation pales. In Irony in language use and communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1], ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Modeling Irony [Figurative Thought and Language, 12], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Figuring out Figuration [Figurative Thought and Language, 14], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Irony, Affect, and Related Figures. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue