Cover not available

In:Irony in Language Use and Communication
Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou and Herbert L. Colston
[Figurative Thought and Language 1] 2017
► pp. 87–108

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 4
Introducing a three-dimensional model of verbal irony

Irony in language, in thought, and in communication

Published online: 14 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.1.05bur
Abstract
We introduce a three-dimensional model for irony research, which is an extension of Steen’s (2008, 2011) three-dimensional model of metaphor and similarly argues that the study of irony requires three distinct dimensions: (1) language, (2) thought and (3) communication. Irony in language requires the study of irony’s linguistic structure. Irony in thought focuses on the obligatory reversal of evaluation between the propositional and intended meaning of an ironic utterance. Irony in communication, finally, focuses on whether the literal meaning serves as a distinct referent in the meaning of the ironic utterance. Our model brings together contemporary research on irony and metaphor within one framework and can guide and inspire both theoretical and empirical research.
Article outline
  • The three-dimensional model of metaphor
  • Irony in language
  • Irony in thought
  • Irony in communication
  • Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (64)
References
Akimoto, Y., Miyazawa, S., & Muramoto, T. (2012). Comprehension processes of verbal irony: The effects of salience, egocentric context, and allocentric theory of mind. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(3), 217–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arendt, F. (2013). Dose‐dependent media priming effects of stereotypic newspaper articles on implicit and explicit stereotypes. Journal of Communication, 63(5), 830–851. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, S. (2000a). Irony markers and functions: Towards a goal-oriented theory of irony and its processing. Rask, 12(1), 3–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000b). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 793–826. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barbe, K. (1995). Irony in Context. Amsterdam (Netherlands): John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beukeboom, C. J., Finkenauer, C., & Wigboldus, D. H. (2010). The negation bias: When negations signal stereotypic expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(6), 978–992. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosco, F. M., & Bucciarelli, M. (2008). Simple and complex deceits and ironies. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(4), 583–607. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bryant, G. A. (2010). Prosodic contrasts in ironic speech. Discourse Processes, 47(7), 545–566. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgers, C., & Beukeboom, C. J. (2016). Stereotype transmission and maintenance through interpersonal communication: The Irony Bias. Communication Research, 43(3), 414–441. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgers, C., Beukeboom, C. J., Kelder, M., & Peeters, M. M. (2015). How sports fans forge intergroup competition through language: The case of verbal irony. Human Communication Research, 41(3), 435–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J. (2016). Figurative Framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole and irony. Communication Theory, 26(4), 410–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgers, C., & van Mulken, M. (2017). Humor markers. In S. Attardo (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor (pp. 385–399). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgers, C., van Mulken, M., & Schellens, P. J. (2011). Finding irony: An introduction of the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP). Metaphor and Symbol, 26(3), 186–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012a). Type of evaluation and marking of irony: The role of perceived complexity and comprehension. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(3), 231–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012b). Verbal irony: Differences in usage across written genres. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(3), 290–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On the Pretense Theory of Irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 121–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. L., & Keller, S. B. (1998). You’ll never believe this: Irony and hyperbole in expressing surprise. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(4), 499–513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Currie, G. (2006). Why irony is pretense. In S. Nichols (Ed.), The Architecture of the Imagination: New Essays on Pretense, Possibility, and Fiction (pp. 111–133). Oxford (UK): Clarendon Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1999). Obligatory processing of literal and nonliteral meanings in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1579–1599. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fein, O., Yeari, M., & Giora, R. (2015). On the priority of salience-based interpretations: The case of sarcastic irony. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(1), 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraenkel, T., & Schul, Y. (2008). The meaning of negated adjectives. Intercultural Pragmatics, 5(4), 517–540. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1986). On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(1), 3–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(4), 457–486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2008). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Are ironic acts deliberate?. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(1), 104–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, R. (2003). On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, R., Balaban, N., Fein, O., & Alkabets, I. (2005). Negation as positivity in disguise. In H. L. Colston and A. N. Katz (Eds.). Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences (pp. 233–258). Hillsdale, NJ (USA): Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, R., & Fein, O. (1999). Irony: Context and salience. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(4), 241–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., & Schwartz, T. (1998). Irony: Graded salience and indirect negation. Metaphor and Symbol, 13(2), 83–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, R., Givoni, S., & Fein, O. (2015). Defaultness reigns: The case of sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(4), 290–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, R., Givoni, S., Heruti, V., & Fein, O. (2017). The role of defaultness in affecting pleasure: The Optimal Innovation Hypothesis revisited. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(1), 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hancock, J. T. (2004). Verbal irony use in face-to-face and computer-mediated conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4), 447–463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kapogianni, E. (2016). The ironic operation: Revisiting the components of ironic meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 91, 16–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kovaz, D., Kreuz, R. J., & Riordan, M. A. (2013). Distinguishing sarcasm from literal language: Evidence from books and blogging. Discourse Processes, 50(8), 598–615. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krennmayr, T., Bowdle, B. F., Mulder, G., & Steen, G. J. (2014). Economic competition is like auto racing: Building metaphorical schemas when reading text. Metaphor and the Social World, 4(1), 65–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J. (1996). The use of verbal irony: Cues and constraints. In J. S. Mio & A. N. Katz (Eds.), Metaphor: Implications and Applications (pp. 23–38). Mahwah, NJ (USA): Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., Kassler, M. A., Coppenrath, L., & Allen, B. M. (1999). Tag questions and common ground effects in the perception of verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1685–1700. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Link, K. E. (2002). Asymmetries in the use of verbal irony. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(2), 127–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Roberts, R. M. (1995). Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(1), 21–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (1995). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(1), 3–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kunneman, F., Liebrecht, C., van Mulken, M., & van den Bosch, A. (2015). Signaling sarcasm: From hyperbole to hashtag. Information Processing & Management, 51(4), 500–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL (USA): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (1996). Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4), 424–438. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mialon, H. M., & Mialon, S. H. (2013). Go figure: The strategy of nonliteral speech. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 5(2), 186–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2017). Metaphor, irony and sarcasm in public discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 109, 95–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, A. (2007). Irony and reversal of evaluation. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(9), 1547–1569. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Popa-Wyatt, M. (2014). Pretence and echo: Towards an integrated account of verbal irony. International Review of Pragmatics, 6(1), 127–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quintilian (1959). The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian: With an English Translation by H. E. Butler, MA (Vol. 3). London: William Heinemann (Original work published around AD 95).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roncero, C., de Almeida, R. G., Martin, D. C., & de Caro, M. (2016). Aptness predicts metaphor preference in the lab and on the Internet. Metaphor and Symbol, 31(1), 31–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwoebel, J., Dews, S., Winner, E., & Srinivas, K. (2000). Obligatory processing of the literal meaning of ironic utterances: Further evidence. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 47–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the Use – Mention Distinction. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 295–318). New York, NY (USA): Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. J. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: Now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 67–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam (Netherlands): John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Utsumi, A. (2000). Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from non-irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(12), 1777–1806. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, L. E., & Poehlman, T. A. (2017). Conceptualizing consciousness in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(2), 231–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (2013). Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 40–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua, 87(1), 53–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Relevance Theory. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, 249–287.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Ahrens, Kathleen, Christian Burgers & Yin Zhong
2024. Making the Unseen Seen: The Role of Signaling and Novelty in Rating Metaphors. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 53:3 DOI logo
O’Dowd, Niamh A
2024. The potential of creative uses of metonymy for climate protest. Discourse & Society 35:3 ► pp. 360 ff. DOI logo
Zampese, Luciano
2024. Forme e funzioni dell’ironia in Libera nos a malo. In Meneghello 100 [Biblioteca di Studi di Filologia Moderna, 77], ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Belaj, Branimir & Goran Tanacković Faletar
2022. Verbal and situational irony. In Figurative Thought and Language in Action [Figurative Thought and Language, 16], ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Fornieles Sánchez, Raquel
2022. Evidenciales e ironía en Esquines y Demóstenes. Emerita 90:2 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Barnden, John
2021. Metaphor and irony. In Figurative Language - Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Barnden, John
2023. Irony, Exaggeration, and Hyperbole: No Embargo on the Cargo!. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 272 ff. DOI logo
Barnden, John & Andrew Gargett
2020.  Introduction. In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Irony, Affect, and Related Figures. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue