Cover not available

In:Irony in Language Use and Communication
Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou and Herbert L. Colston
[Figurative Thought and Language 1] 2017
► pp. 61–84

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 3
In defense of an ecumenical approach to irony

Published online: 14 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.1.04wil
Abstract
The term “irony” has such a broad and apparently diverse range of application that it’s difficult for researchers to coordinate on a single, operational concept of their target of investigation, suitable for designing and interpreting experiments aimed at uncovering irony’s nature. Restrictive strategies for addressing this difficulty advocate restricting the target of empirical irony studies to some scientifically tractable subset of the phenomena “irony” picks out in ordinary language. Ecumenical approaches, in contrast, retain the ambition to account for “irony” across its apparently diverse range of usage. In this paper, I highlight the limitations of the best developed restrictivist approaches, throwing into relief the potential value of ecumenical strategies still in early stages of development.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.The problem of promiscuous application
  • 2.The restrictive-ecumenical continuum
  • 3.The case for restrictivism
  • 4.The inadequacy of restrictivism
    • 4.1What should a good theory of irony accomplish?
    • 4.2The limitations of restrictivism
  • 5.The attractions of an ecumenical approach
  • Conclusion: Is an ecumenical approach viable?
  • Notes
  • References
References (40)
References
Almond, S. (2016, May 16). Jon Stewart – the enabler of Donald Trump. Boston Globe. Retrieved from [URL]
Aristotle. (2004). Nicomachean Ethics. (F. H. Peters, Trans.). New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, S. (2007). Irony as Relevant Inappropriateness. In R. W. Gibbs & H. L. Colston (Eds.), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader (1 edition). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barrett, H. C., & Kurzban, R. (2006). Modularity in Cognition: Framing the Debate. Psychological Review, 113(3), 628–647. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bryant, G. A. (2012). Is Verbal Irony Special? Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(11), 673–685. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camp, E. (2012). Sarcasm, Pretense, and The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Noûs, 46(4), 587–634. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 121–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. L. (2000). On Necessary Conditions for Verbal Irony Comprehesion. Pragmatics and Cognition, 8(2), 277–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(this volume). Irony performance and perception: What underlies verbal, situational, and other ironies? In A. Athanasiadou & H. L. Colston (Eds.), Irony in Language Use and Communication. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Currie, G. (2006). Why Irony is Pretence. In S. Nichols (Ed.), The Architecture of the Imagination: New Essays on Pretence, Possibility, and Fiction (1st ed.). Oxford University Press, USA. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). The Irony in Pictures. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 51(2), 149–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filippova, E., & Astington, J. W. (2010). Children’s Understanding of Social-Cognitive and Social-Communicative Aspects of Discourse Irony. Child Development, 81(3), 913–928. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fogelin, R. (2011). Figuratively Speaking: Revised Edition (2 edition). Oxford University Press, USA. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fowler, H. W. (2009). A Dictionary of Modern English Usage: The Classic First Edition. (D. Crystal, Ed.) (Reissue). Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2007). Irony in Talk among Friends. In H. L. Colston & R. W. Gibbs (Eds.), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader (1 edition). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glenwright, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2010). Development of children’s ability to distinguish sarcasm and verbal irony*. Journal of Child Language, 37(2), 429–451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, P. (1991). Logic and Conversation. In Studies in the Way of Words (pp. 22–40). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haslanger, S. (1999). What Knowledge is and What It Ought to Be: Feminist Values and Normative Epistemology. Philosophical Perspectives, 13(s13), 459–480.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knox, N. (1961). The Word Irony and Its Context: 1500–1755. Duke University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (1995). How about another piece of pie: the allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 124(1), 3–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lear, J. (2011). A Case for Irony. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1970). General Semantics. Synthese, 22(1/2), 18–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lucariello, J. (1994). Situational irony: A concept of events gone awry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(2), 129–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nersessian, N. J. (2010). Creating Scientific Concepts. Cambridge, Mass.: A Bradford Book.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plato. (2002). Meno. In G. M. A. Grube (Trans.), Five Dialogues (2 edition). Hackett Pub Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice (Revised edition). Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, R. M., & Kreuz, R. J. (1994). Why Do People Use Figurative Language? Psychological Science, 5(3), 159–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ronagh, M., & Souder, L. (2014). The Ethics of Ironic Science in Its Search for Spoof. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, B. (2004). Picturing irony: The subversive power of photography. Visual Communication, 3(1), 31–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seckman, M. A., & Couch, C. J. (1989). Jocularity, Sarcasm, and Relationships: An Empirical Study. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 18(3), 327–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Solso, R. L. (1996). Cognition and the Visual Arts. Cambridge, Mass.: A Bradford Book.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (1984). Verbal irony: Pretense or echoic mention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 130–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 295–318). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Irony and Relevance: A Reply to Seto, Hamamoto and Yamanashi. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance Theory: Applications and implications. Amsterdam ; Philadelphia, Pa: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Utsumi, A. (2000). Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(12), 1777–1806. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wallace, D. F. (1997). E Unibus Pluram: Television and U.S. Fiction. In A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again: Essays and Arguments (1st edition). Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (2006). The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua, 116(10), 1722–1743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Irony, Hyperbole, Jokes and Banter. In C. Grisot, J. Blochowiak, S. Durrlemann-Tame, & C. Laenzlinger (Eds.), Papers Dedicated to Jacques Moeschler. Retrieved from [URL]
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2012). Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, J. (2004, August 9). The Digressionist. The New Republic. Retrieved from [URL]
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Barnden, John
2023. Irony, Exaggeration, and Hyperbole: No Embargo on the Cargo!. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 272 ff. DOI logo
Barnden, John
2025. Oxymoron and its interplay with metaphor and irony. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 126 ff. DOI logo
Musolff, Andreas
2021. Cultural Conceptualisations of the Nation as a Body or Person: Scenario Analysis of Metaphor Interpretations. In National Conceptualisations of the Body Politic [Cultural Linguistics, ], ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Giora, Rachel, Dalia Meytes, Ariela Tamir, Shir Givoni, Vered Heruti & Ofer Fein
2017. Defaultness shines while affirmation pales. In Irony in language use and communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1], ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Irony, Affect, and Related Figures. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue