Cover not available

Article published In: FORUM
Vol. 8:2 (2010) ► pp.31–45

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Peut-on parler d'une filiation des ciblistes en France?

 | Université Korea |

Article language: French

Published online: 1 October 2010
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.8.2.02lee
Abstract/Résumé
This study takes Sourciers et Ciblistes, a paper written by Jean Rene Ladmiral as its starting point. He classifies major scholars of France and other countries as either source-oriented or target-oriented, and categorizes himself as a target-oriented author. Paying attention to how very heterogeneous scholars from Cicero to Nida have been classified as target oriented, this study observes how target-oriented authors succeed and affect one another. To this end, major target-oriented authors from France, namely Vinay & Darbelnet, Mounin, and the Paris School which proposed the Interpretive Theory will be discussed, followed by an observation of their similarities and differences.
References (16)
References
Berman, A. (1989). La traduction et ses discours. Meta, 34 (4), 672–679. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clas, A. (1999). Hommage à Jean-Paul Vinay. Meta, 44 (2), 215–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, J.S. (1972). The name and nature of translation studies. 3rd International Congress of Applied Linguistics: Abstracts. Copenhagen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Israël, F. (1990). Traduction littéraire et théorie du sens, In M. Lederer (Ed.) Etudes traductologiques (pp.) 29–43. Paris: Minard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladmiral, J.R. (1986). Sourciers et ciblistes. Revue d'esthétique 121, 33–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). La traduction, un concept aporétique?. In F. Israel (Ed.) Identité, Altérité, Équivalence: Traduction comme relation (pp. 117–161).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). A partir de Goerges Mounin: Esquisse archéologique. TTR, 8 (1), 35–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lederer, M. (1994). La traduction aujourd'hui. Hachette.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). La théorie interprétative de la traduction; origine et evolution, In M. Ballard (Ed.) Qu'est-ce que la traductologie? Artois Presses Université.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobson, , R. On linguistic aspects of translation, In R. Brower (Ed.) On translation (pp.) 232–239. Cambridge.
Mounin, G. (1976). Linguistique et traduction. Dessart et Mardaga.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mounin, G.((1955[1994]). Les belles infidèles. Presses Universitaires de Lille.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nida, E. A. (1964). Towards a science of translating: With special reference to principles and procedures involved in Bible translating. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snell-Hornby, M. (2006). The turns of translation studies. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Venuti, L. (1995). The translator's invisibility. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vinay, J.-P.&Darbelnet, J. (1977). Stylistique comparée du français et de l'anglais : Méthode de traduction. Montréal: Beauchemin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue