Cover not available

Article published In: Ideology and Cross-Cultural Encounters - Research and Methodology in Translation and Interpreting / Idéologie et les rencontres des cultures - recherche et méthodologie en traduction et interprétation
[FORUM 7:1] 2009
► pp. 203–221

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

De Berman à Venuti

Approches postcoloniales sur la traduction

 | Université Hankuk des Etudes étrangères, Corée du Sud
 | GSIT, Université Hankuk des Etudes étrangères

Article language: French

Published online: 1 April 2009
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.7.1.09yun
Postcolonial theory, widening the horizons of translation research, has played a significant role in the history of translation studies. But this interdisciplinary field was often neglected. This paper analyses two major authors of translation studies, Berman, French translator and theorist and Venuti, American theorist inspired by Berman, and examines their similarities and differences. It compares their theoretical frames, ‘traduction de la lettre’ of Berman and ‘resistant translation’ of Venuti and finally reaches the conclusion that, for a better understanding of the peculiarities of each situation of translational acts, a third paradigm, proposed by Deleuze, can be useful.
References (15)
Bandia, P. (2001). « Le concept bermanien de l"Etranger dans le prisme de la traduction postcoloniale ». TTR 14(2). 123–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassnett, S. & Lefevere, A. (eds.). (1990). Translation, History and Culture. London & New York: Pinter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, A. (1999a). La traduction et la lettre ou l’auberge du lointain. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999b). « L’âge de la traduction- La tâche du traducteur de Walter Benjamin », La traduction-poésie d’Antoine Berman, Strasbourg: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. (1921/1971). « La tâche du traducteur ». In Walter Benjamin, Oeuvres I. Mythe et violence,. Maurice de Gandillac (trad.).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1968). Différence et Répétition. Paris: Presses Universitaire de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1980). Mille plateaux. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1983). Proust et les signes. Paris: Presses Universitaire de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladmiral, Jean-René. (1986). « Sourciers et ciblistes », Revue d’Esthétique (121), 33–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lefevere, A. (1992). Translation, rewriting and the manipulation of literary frame. London:Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munday, J. (2001). Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and applications. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pym, A. (1997). Pour une éthique du traducteur. Arras: Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa & Artois Presses Université.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, D. (1997). Translation and Empire. Manchester: Saint Jerome publishing. Forum 6(1), 179–192.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Venuti, L. (1998). The scandals of translation. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue